golang February 2014

golang@lists.fedoraproject.org

6 participants
117 discussions

[Bug 1060454] Review Request: golang-github-armon-go-metrics - Collect run time and performance metrics in golang software
by Red Hat Bugzilla 04 Feb '14

04 Feb '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060454 Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |golang(a)lists.fedoraproject. | |org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1060494] Review Request: golang-github-armon-mdns - Simple mDNS client/server library in Golang
by Red Hat Bugzilla 04 Feb '14

04 Feb '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060494 Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |golang(a)lists.fedoraproject. | |org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1060500] Review Request: golang-github-miekg-dns - Alternative (more granular) approach to a DNS library
by Red Hat Bugzilla 04 Feb '14

04 Feb '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060500 Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |golang(a)lists.fedoraproject. | |org, lemenkov(a)gmail.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1060502] Review Request: golang-github-mitchellh-cli - A library for implementing powerful command-line interfaces in Go
by Red Hat Bugzilla 04 Feb '14

04 Feb '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060502 Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |golang(a)lists.fedoraproject. | |org, lemenkov(a)gmail.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1060503] Review Request: golang-github-mitchellh-mapstructure - A Go library for decoding generic map values to structures and vice versa
by Red Hat Bugzilla 04 Feb '14

04 Feb '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060503 Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |golang(a)lists.fedoraproject. | |org, lemenkov(a)gmail.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1060580] Review Request: golang-github-hashicorp-logutils - A Go package that augments the standard library "log" package
by Red Hat Bugzilla 04 Feb '14

04 Feb '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060580 Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |golang(a)lists.fedoraproject. | |org, lemenkov(a)gmail.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

A bit of help packaging a difficult thing
by Jeff Schroeder 02 Feb '14

02 Feb '14

Hello fellow gophers, I'm trying to package serf[1] for Fedora. As a result, I've filed a few review requests[2]. Most of those were super easy to do and that isn't really what this email is about assuming that running go test in %check is the proper way to do things. I took a spec from one of lsm5's packages and went from there (but added the testing stage). Some of the packages that serf depends on such as github.com/vmihailenco/bufio have relative imports of the package in the tests and as a result, refuse to build outside of $GOPATH. The issue with this is that is makes it impossible for me to currently test building this with rpmbuild, mock, or koji. I've filed an issue with the upstream maintainer[3], but am curious if there is anything else that could be done to handle this? Also, labix.org/v2/mgo/bson is stored in bzr. They will occasionally do a release, but don't provide tarballs. I've also sent an email to their list[4] asking if there is a way to get the release as a tarball. In lieu of pristine upstream sources, what is the "proper" fedora packaging thing to do? Finally, while I've created rpms as part of $dayjob for 5+ years, I've never contributed them back to Fedora/Redhat and thought it was high time to fix that. Other than filing the review requests, what else is there I need to do for having these packages sponsored? Thanks in advance! [1] http://www.serfdom.io [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_status=NEW&bug_status=VERIFIED&… [3] https://github.com/vmihailenco/bufio/issues/4 [4] https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/mgo-users/5RU_mTQfbKs -- Jeff Schroeder Don't drink and derive, alcohol and analysis don't mix. http://www.digitalprognosis.com

1 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

golang February 2014