golang November 2021

golang@lists.fedoraproject.org

3 participants
5 discussions

[go-rpm-macros] Issue #36: Renaming BUILDTAGS and LDFLAGS to include GO prefixes
by Link Dupont 20 Jun '22

20 Jun '22

linkdupont reported a new issue against the project: `go-rpm-macros` that you are following: `` In #34 and #35, it was brought up to rename the `BUILDTAGS` variable to `GOBUILDTAGS` in order to be more explicit about the intended use of the variables and to avoid any potential namespace collision with other variables. I looked into what packages are using `BUILDTAGS` today to figure out how much of an impact a rename like this will have. As of this writing, the following packages are using `BUILDTAGS` in some capacity: ``` buildah.spec containernetworking-plugins.spec cri-tools.spec go-compilers.spec golang-github-prometheus-node-exporter.spec golang-github-prometheus.spec grafana.spec hugo.spec moby-engine.spec oci-seccomp-bpf-hook.spec pack.spec podman.spec reg.spec runc.spec skopeo.spec snapd.spec source-to-image.spec stargz-snapshotter.spec syncthing.spec weldr-client.spec ``` And the follow packages use `LDFLAGS`: ``` aerc.spec age.spec butane.spec clash.spec containerd.spec doctl.spec fzf.spec geoipupdate.spec git-lfs.spec golang-github-aliyun-cli.spec golang-github-colinmarc-hdfs-2.spec golang-github-haproxytech-dataplaneapi.spec golang-github-hub.spec golang-github-jsonnet-bundler.spec golang-github-magefile-mage.spec golang-github-prometheus.spec golang-github-rfjakob-gocryptfs.spec golang-github-tdewolff-minify.spec golang-github-theoapp-theo-agent.spec golang-mvdan-editorconfig.spec ignition.spec kiln.spec micro.spec open-policy-agent.spec osbuild-composer.spec rclone.spec reg.spec source-to-image.spec syncthing.spec tinygo.spec vgrep.spec weldr-client.spec ``` I identified these packages by grepping the contents of the [current spec tarball](https://src.fedoraproject.org/repo/rpm-specs-latest.tar.xz). To avoid breaking these packages that are currently using `BUILDTAGS` or `LDFLAGS`, there are two possible approaches I see to safely rename the variables: #### 1. Rebuild everything in a side-tag Patch `go-rpm-macros` to rename `BUILDTAGS` and `LDFLAGS` to `GOBUILDTAGS` and `GOLDFLAGS` respectively. Then patch the above packages and stage them all in a side-tag to update them in one monolithic Bodhi update. #### 2. Support both old and new variables at the same time Patch `go-rpm-macros` to support **both** `BUILDTAGS`/`LDFLAGS` *and* `GOBUILDTAGS`/`GOLDFLAGS` simultaneously. Then patch the above packages over time until everything has been ported over to using `GOBUILDTAGS` and `GOLDFLAGS`, and then drop the old variables from `go-rpm-macros`. I'm not sure how easy either of these approaches will be. They are both moving targets as new packages are constantly getting added. It might just be a constant effort to try and keep on top of all the patches as new packages come along and patches need to be rebased onto their target's changes. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/go-rpm-macros/issue/36

3 4

[go-rpm-macros] PR #37: srpm/go.lua: fix handling of version numbers with multiple digits
by Tommi Rantala 19 Dec '21

19 Dec '21

tomranta opened a new pull-request against the project: `go-rpm-macros` that you are following: `` srpm/go.lua: fix handling of version numbers with multiple digits `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/go-rpm-macros/pull-request/37

3 3

packaging sourcegraph cli -- any volunteers?
by Matthew Miller 01 Dec '21

01 Dec '21

I've been talking with the awesome people at Sourcegraph, and they're interested in indexing our packages. Still working out what that'l look like exactly, but I'm pretty excited about it. (They're an open-source company with a SaaS product. Also at least some of their folks run Fedora Linux, so that's extra cool.) In our conversation, they mentioned that it'd be nice to have their command-line tool packaged. Anyone interested in taking that on? Looks pretty straightforward, although I'm not sure of any Go lang pitfalls that might await. https://github.com/sourcegraph/src-cli (Also, we already have a package named `src`, which is a apparently and RCS (!!!!?!?!?!) wrapper. So we'll need to figure out a different comand name; maybe src-cli, maybe 'sourcegraph', dunno.) They'd also be interested in having the actual search engine tool itself packaged (https://github.com/sourcegraph/sourcegraph) -- but that's a bigger project. (Still, volunteers welcome!) -- Matthew Miller <mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org> Fedora Project Leader

3 5

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Go SIG
by jcajka＠fedoraproject.org 21 Nov '21

21 Nov '21

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: Go SIG on 2021-11-22 from 20:00:00 to 21:00:00 Europe/Prague At fedora-golang(a)libera.chat The meeting will be about: Fedora's Go SIG meeting More information available at: [https://pagure.io/GoSIG/go-sig/](https://pagure.io/GoSIG/go-sig/) Source: https://calendar.fedoraproject.org//meeting/10012/

1 0

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Go SIG
by jcajka＠fedoraproject.org 07 Nov '21

07 Nov '21

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: Go SIG on 2021-11-08 from 20:00:00 to 21:00:00 Europe/Prague At fedora-golang(a)libera.chat The meeting will be about: Fedora's Go SIG meeting More information available at: [https://pagure.io/GoSIG/go-sig/](https://pagure.io/GoSIG/go-sig/) Source: https://calendar.fedoraproject.org//meeting/10012/

1 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

golang November 2021