r-devel June 2009

r-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

3 participants
3 discussions

Update the guidelines
by Pierre-Yves Chibon 04 Aug '09

04 Aug '09

Dear all, I would like to propose to update (or mention) some points in the R packaging guidelines. * Mention something about the tex files which are not utf-8 and don't necessarily have to be converted see: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2009-January/msg00741.html * Mention something about the -devel package where the headers don't necessarily have to moved to %{_datadir} since R looks for them in %{_libdir}. see: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-r-devel-list/2009-March/msg00001.html What is your opinion on these changes ? What is the process to propose such changes/updates ? Thanks, Best regards, Pierre

1 2

[Fwd: [R-sig-Fedora] License quandry in the Fedora sub-space of all R packages]
by Pierre-Yves Chibon 11 Jun '09

11 Jun '09

Dear list, It seems that the address used originally for this mail was wrong there is therefore a forward from the r-sig-fedora mailing list. Regards, Pierre

1 0

R2spec and version number
by Pierre-Yves Chibon 04 Jun '09

04 Jun '09

Dear all, I would like your opinion regarding: [Bug 503108] New: R2spec-2.5.2 loses Version information It basically says that when the package version is 2.3-50 R2spec only retrieve 2.3 as being the version number. To me and based on the packages R-abind, R-acepack, R-mAR (and some other that I didn't list) this is not a bug. Do you agree with me ? Thanks, Best regards, Pierre

4 5

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

r-devel June 2009