On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 15:36, Dan Horák dan@danny.cz wrote:
seth vidal píše v Po 30. 08. 2010 v 15:27 -0400:
On Mon, 2010-08-30 at 15:13 -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
Right. But don't you think this group could at least come up with a list of proposals, or even one proposal? It could include a longer support timeframe, but also detail how Fedora is not friendly to Server today.
It needs a longer support lifetime and/or a slower update rate.
I think that's really all.
slower update rate - I don't think the core required for running server services changes so often and the server services itself also don't have too many updates, I've not done any analysis though
PS: I know I don't give this project as much time as I originally planned, but the work on Fedora/s390x takes a lot of time and we see it as an investment into the future. The dinosaurus will be here for a long time :-)
Should we try and experiment with a 'sub' distribution? Say take Fedora 12 and keep it running for 18 months? [Lets not get into how this will fail... how could we make it work?]