fonts October 2007

fonts@lists.fedoraproject.org

14 participants
104 discussions

[Fedora-fonts-list] Fonts spec template validation
by Nicolas Mailhot 03 Nov '07

03 Nov '07

Hi all, While the current spec template in the Fonts SIG wiki (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Fonts/Packaging/SpecTemplate) only documents common Fedora Fonts packaging practices, it's never been formally approved. I intend to submit it to FPC soon. If anyone on the fonts list object to part of this page or wants something clarified, please speak now Regards, -- Nicolas Mailhot

3 5

[Fedora-fonts-list] [Bug 360901] New: Smaller fonts in X in F8T3 after login
by Red Hat Bugzilla 01 Nov '07

01 Nov '07

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=360901 Summary: Smaller fonts in X in F8T3 after login Product: Fedora Version: f8test3 Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: xorg-x11-fonts AssignedTo: xgl-maint(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: mcrha(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: caillon@redhat.com,fedora-fonts-list@redhat.com Description of problem: I noticed smaller fonts in F8T3 gnome with compare to F7. Even I saw some mails about it on mailing list, then I think this is a bit different. I noticed that right after login fonts are a bit bigger, for about 2-3 seconds, and then is something loaded (I guess), which makes fonts significantly smaller. I can still read it, but they are really smaller than on F7. It's smaller for all the gnome, not only for menu or some particular parts of window. Also, I noticed it on a message I described at bug #360851, which is there every login for me. I can see after login this message with bigger fonts, and I didn't do anything and they are suddenly smaller, after that 2-3 seconds. I'm not sure how to describe it better, or how to investigate what causes this, but if you can guide me, then I will try to help. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 4

[Fedora-fonts-list] [Bug 360861] New: sazanami-fonts is installed if Japanese support is excluded
by Red Hat Bugzilla 31 Oct '07

31 Oct '07

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=360861 Summary: sazanami-fonts is installed if Japanese support is excluded Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: sazanami-fonts AssignedTo: tagoh(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: jreiser(a)bitwagon.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-fonts-list(a)redhat.com Description of problem: sazanami-fonts-gothic is composed onto install media and installed by default despite commenting out "## @japanese-support" in /usr/share/pungi/f8-fedora.ks. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): sazanami-fonts-gothic-0.20040629-4.20061016.fc8 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1. comment out "@japanese-support" in /usr/share/pungi/f8-fedora.ks by inserting a hash '#' at the beginning of the line. 2. compose install media using pungi; install with defaults 3. rpm -qa | grep sazanami Actual results: sazanami-fonts-gothic-0.20040629-4.20061016.fc8 Expected results: No sazanami-fonts because support for Japanese was excluded explicitly. Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 8

[Fedora-fonts-list] [Bug 360811] New: jomolhari-fonts is installed if Tibetan language is excluded
by Red Hat Bugzilla 31 Oct '07

31 Oct '07

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=360811 Summary: jomolhari-fonts is installed if Tibetan language is excluded Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: jomolhari-fonts AssignedTo: mgarski(a)post.pl ReportedBy: jreiser(a)bitwagon.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-fonts-list(a)redhat.com Description of problem: jomolhari-fonts is composed onto install media and instaslled by default despite commenting out "## @ tibetan-support" in /usr/share/pungi/f8-fedora.ks. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): jomolhari-fonts-0.003-4.fc8 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1. comment-out "@ tibetan-support" in /usr/share/pungi/f8-fedora.ks by inserting a hash '#' at the beginning of the line 2. compuse install media using pungi; install with defaults 3. rpm -qa | grep jomolhari-fonts Actual results: jomolhari-fonts-0.003-4.fc8 Expected results: No jolmolhari-fonts because Tibetan language support was excluded explicitly. Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 7

[Fedora-fonts-list] [Bug 360801] New: baekmuk-ttf-fonts are installed if Korean language is excluded
by Red Hat Bugzilla 31 Oct '07

31 Oct '07

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=360801 Summary: baekmuk-ttf-fonts are installed if Korean language is excluded Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: baekmuk-ttf-fonts AssignedTo: cchance(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: jreiser(a)bitwagon.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-fonts-list@redhat.com,petersen@redhat.com Description of problem: The baekmuk-* packages are composed onto install media and installed by default even if "## @ korean-support" has been explicitly commented out from /usr/share/pungi/f8-fedora.ks. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): baekmuk-ttf-fonts-*-2.2-6.fc8 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1. comment out all "@ <language>-support" lines in /usr/share/pungi/f8-fedora.ks by inserting a hash '#' at the beginning of the line 2. compose install media; install with defaults 3. rpm -qa | grep baekmuk Actual results: baekmuk-ttf-fonts-common-2.2-6.fc8 baekmuk-ttf-fonts-gulim-2.2-6.fc8 Expected results: No baekmuk fonts because Korean was excluded explicitly. Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 2

[Fedora-fonts-list] [Bug 360781] New: lohit-fonts-* are installed even if corresponding language is excluded
by Red Hat Bugzilla 31 Oct '07

31 Oct '07

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=360781 Summary: lohit-fonts-* are installed even if corresponding language is excluded Product: Fedora Version: fc6test3 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: lohit-fonts AssignedTo: rbhalera(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: jreiser(a)bitwagon.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-fonts-list@redhat.com,petersen@redhat.com Description of problem: The lohit-fonts-* packages are composed onto install media (and installed by default) even when the corresponding languages have been excluded intentionally. Instead, commenting out "## @malayalam-support" in /usr/share/pungi/f8-fedora.ks should omit the package lohit-fonts-malayalam, etc. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): lohit-fonts-*-2.1.5-3.fc8 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Comment out all the "@ <language>-support" lines in /usr/share/pungi/f8-fedora.ks by inserting a hash '#' at the beginning of the line. 2. compose install media using pungi; install with defaults 3. rpm -qa | grep lohit-fonts Actual results: lohit-fonts-bengali-2.1.5-3.fc8 lohit-fonts-gujarati-2.1.5-3.fc8 lohit-fonts-hindi-2.1.5-3.fc8 lohit-fonts-kannada-2.1.5-3.fc8 lohit-fonts-malayalam-2.1.5-3.fc8 lohit-fonts-oriya-2.1.5-3.fc8 lohit-fonts-punjabi-2.1.5-3.fc8 lohit-fonts-tamil-2.1.5-3.fc8 lohit-fonts-telugu-2.1.5-3.fc8 Expected results: No "lohit-fonts" lines because language support for those languages was suppressed. Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 3

[Fedora-fonts-list] [Bug 354991] New: why not dejavu-lgc-fonts 2.20. why redundancy
by Red Hat Bugzilla 31 Oct '07

31 Oct '07

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=354991 Summary: why not dejavu-lgc-fonts 2.20. why redundancy Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: dejavu-lgc-fonts AssignedTo: besfahbo(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: apodtele(a)ucsd.edu QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-fonts-list@redhat.com,nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net F8-devel, as it stands now, contains dejavu-lgc-fonts-2.19 dejavu-fonts-2.20 They come from the same source, but the smaller package lags behind. 2.20 was cleaned up, so lgc would be even smaller. Is this a historically high risk update? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 2

[Fedora-fonts-list] [Bug 346911] New: Port fontconfig to use NSS library for cryptography
by Red Hat Bugzilla 31 Oct '07

31 Oct '07

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=346911 Summary: Port fontconfig to use NSS library for cryptography Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: fontconfig AssignedTo: besfahbo(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: pvrabec(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-fonts-list@redhat.com,tmraz@redhat.com fontconfig should be ported to use NSS library for cryptography. See the tracking bug for details and links on how it could be done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 6

[Fedora-fonts-list] [Bug 361101] New: Italic Liberation Serif produces a weird character instead of an a with a tilde
by Red Hat Bugzilla 31 Oct '07

31 Oct '07

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=361101 Summary: Italic Liberation Serif produces a weird character instead of an a with a tilde Product: Fedora Version: f7 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: high Priority: low Component: liberation-fonts AssignedTo: cchance(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: criscuolo.marcelo(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-fonts-list(a)redhat.com Description of problem: When you type an "a" with a tilde (ã) using italic Liberation Serif, you get a weird blurred character. Steps to Reproduce: Type an "a" with a tilde in any application using italic Liberation Serif. Or you can use ã in HTML formatting the character as italic and using Liberation Serif as the browser font. ------- Additional Comments From criscuolo.marcelo(a)gmail.com 2007-10-31 19:05 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=244971) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=244971&action=view) A screenshot of the weird a in OpenOffice (but it happens in any application). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 2

[Fedora-fonts-list] [Bug 222963] When selecting cjk ttf font on xfontsel, FreeType: couldn't find encoding 'encoding...`
by Red Hat Bugzilla 31 Oct '07

31 Oct '07

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: When selecting cjk ttf font on xfontsel, FreeType: couldn't find encoding 'encoding...` https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=222963 ------- Additional Comments From petersen(a)redhat.com 2007-10-31 01:45 EST ------- I don't really understand > FreeType: couldn't find encoding 'jisx0208.1983-0' since it is common for Japanese fonts under Linux too. > FreeType: couldn't find encoding 'adobe-standard' for > FreeType: couldn't find encoding 'adobe-standard' for > FreeType: couldn't find encoding 'adobe-standard' for Can freetype handle these types of non-unix encoding? Or is it just following X locale? Sangu, why do you wish to use xfontsel? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

fonts October 2007