fonts March 2008

fonts@lists.fedoraproject.org

2 participants
2 discussions

New Location For Lohit Fonts
by Rahul Bhalerao 01 Apr '08

01 Apr '08

Hi all, The Lohit fonts project hereon will be hosted on fedorahosted.org. Following is the new homepage of the project: https://www.fedorahosted.org/lohit This had to be done since the previous location i.e. wiki on fedoraproject.org had many limitations. The new location which is based on "trac" is a better project management system. Note that the the version control system is changed from cvs to svn. We now also have the facility to view and browse the source online. There have been requests to make tarballs available in a form other than wiki attachments, so that is also done temporarily now. For more details please visit the new project home page. Thanks, Rahul Bhalerao.

2 1

[LONG] State of the Fedora Fonts SIG
by Nicolas Mailhot 16 Mar '08

16 Mar '08

Hi all, Since it's Fedora 9 feature freeze/beta release time, I thought it would be good to take a look at what happened during the Fedora 8 cycle on the fonts front and make an advancement summary. This is mostly the same thing as in the release notes but much more detailed and contributor, not user oriented. A. Infrastructure/background work 1. a Fonts SIG was created, with the associated infrastructure wiki : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Fonts mailing lists : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Fonts#ML 2. Font packaging documentation was written,reviewed and approved by FPC and FESCO http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Fonts/Packaging/Policy http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Fonts/Packaging/SpecTemplate http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Fonts/Packaging/Fontconfig (the fonts spec template was added to rpmdevtools and will be available whenever a new rpmdevtools release is made hint hint) 3. Legal rules for fonts within Fedora were clarified, http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Fonts/Legal#licenses 4. A long list of potential packageable floss fonts was written http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Fonts/Triaging/Pipeline#Wishes (Given the usual font licensing mess, that's no small feat, many thanks to Máirín Duffy who contributed most of it) 5. Work is under way to identify upstream font-related problems that affect Fedora, in the hope Fedora developers can contribute to their fixing, and Fedora users can comment in the upstream issues trackers and make them a priority upstream http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Fonts/QA#known-problems B. Distribution changes 1. As a result of the licensing rules clarification, some historic RHL/Fedora fonts were dropped (Luxy, Syriac fonts, etc) http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewcvs/devel/xorg-x11-fonts/xorg-x11-fonts.sp… Hunky was dropped from the release for lack of userbase (early Bitstream Vera derivative, since then completely deprecated in favour of DejaVu) 2. New font tools (xgridfit…) were packaged, others (fontforge) updated 3. New fonts were packaged Greek Font Society fonts (13 fonts, Greek and Latin support) Stix (math and engineering symbols) Tiresias (low-vision latin fonts) Samyak and Sarai fonts (indic support) Thaifonts-scalable (Thai support) The WenQuanYi Zen Hei (Chinese sans-serif font) Inconsolata (monospace font) Silkscreen, Yanone Kaffeesatz (art fonts) efont (bitmap terminal font) 4. Efforts were expended to classify fonts in comps a bit better http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewcvs/comps/comps-f9.xml.in 5. The two main distribution fonts, DejaVu and Liberation were updated to new versions increasing unicode coverage. DejaVu replaced DejaVu LGC as default font set at the beginning of the Fedora 9 cycle. Since I know this is all very nebulous, here are some numbers Fedora 8 sans-serif default fonts at release time: DejaVu LGC Sans: 3768 glyphs (2.19) Liberation Sans: 668 glyphs (0.2) DejaVu Sans: 4959 glyphs (2.20) (would prempt the two others, but not installed by default) Current Fedora devel ans-serif default fonts: DejaVu Sans: 5270 glyphs (2.24) Liberation Sans: 668 glyphs (1.0, many fixes in the 0.2 glyphs) C. What remains to be done (short-term) 1. Package more fonts. We now have a font packager-friendly environment. With clear packaging guidelines and a huge font wishlist, packaging work now mostly consists in contacting upstreams to make them release files in packageable state (with license, versions, etc) and filling in the standard font spec template. Thus we mainly need motivated packagers. The work is not hard, if time consuming, and there's no way the current team can do it all by itself. Spreading the load would help a lot. 2. Get bugs fixed upstream Unfortunately Linux problems are somewhat low on the radar or projects like Firefox and Mozilla, and problems of Linux users that didn't copy Windows fonts even lower. We need more people to comment/vote on the issues referenced in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Fonts/QA#known-problems I could write a lot more, but this is long enough so it will have to do. Do not hesitate to send comments or ask questions on on the SIG list. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Fonts#ML Regards, -- Nicolas Mailhot

1 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

fonts March 2008