haskell-devel June 2008

haskell-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

6 participants
30 discussions

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 451872] New: Package request: ghc-6.8.3
by Red Hat Bugzilla 15 Jul '08

15 Jul '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451872 Summary: Package request: ghc-6.8.3 Product: Fedora Version: 9 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: ghc AssignedTo: bos(a)serpentine.com ReportedBy: bos(a)serpentine.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-haskell- list@redhat.com,loupgaroublond@gmail.com,petersen@redhat .com This is a bugfix release: http://haskell.org/ghc/docs/6.8.3/html/users_guide/release-6-8-3.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 3

[Fedora-haskell-list] haddock build failed
by Jens-Ulrik Petersen 26 Jun '08

26 Jun '08

I updated haddock/devel for the new ghc. Unfortunately this build also failed: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=676017&name=build.log Jens

1 1

[Fedora-haskell-list] Library Packages, how should we handle devel files?
by Yaakov Nemoy 24 Jun '08

24 Jun '08

Hi List, I'm going over the packaging stuff, and I have another blocker question. rpmlint is giving me errors involving devel files being included in non devel packages. Do we need devel and non devel packages, or does it make more sense that people who need a package also need a devel package? -Yaakov

1 0

Various packages (WAS: [Fedora-haskell-list] Mass closure of submissions?)
by Miles Sabin 24 Jun '08

24 Jun '08

On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 12:52 AM, Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> wrote: > Miles Sabin さんは書きました: > > I have about half a dozen packages which I really ought to get underway > > (GOA, lambdabot and their dependencies). > > Cool: so how about starting with one of those first then? OK, I have the following, ghc682-agda-2.1.3-0.20080311.fc8 ghc682-arrows-0.4-1.fc8 ghc682-binary-0.4.1-1.fc8 ghc682-goa-3.0-1.fc8 ghc682-http-3001.0.4-1.fc8 ghc682-oeis-0.1-1.fc8 ghc682-plugins-1.1-0.20080311.fc8 ghc682-quickcheck-2.0-1.fc8 ghc682-stream-0.2.3-1.fc8 ghc682-zlib-0.4.0.4-1.fc8 zlib seems like being the obvious starting point. So, the administration. I've looked at the instructions here, https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join I've already created myself a Fedora project account, but I haven't yet completed a CLA or found a sponsor. It looks as tho' my next steps are to put the package up on some webspace somewhere and create a review request in bugzilla. Before I do that I'd like to make sure that what I've done matches the current Haskell packaging guidelines. The most recent of those that I've been able to find are here, http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Haskell Are these current? And how closely does the most recent cabal-rpm conform to them (I have 0.3.3)? I think it would also make sense for me to join the Fedora Haskell SIG ... Am I right that I just add my name at the bottom of the page here, http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Haskell Cheers, Miles

3 3

[Fedora-haskell-list] ghc status update
by Bryan O'Sullivan 23 Jun '08

23 Jun '08

Various things are broken as a result of the upgrade to 6.8.3 in rawhide. I haven't backported 6.8.3 to F-9 yet, so it's not affected. The problems I know of all have Bugzilla reports. ghc-doc is missing Haddock docs. haddock 2.0 doesn't work with 6.8.3, and can't be rebuild against it. gtk2hs doesn't rebuild against 6.8.3. I'm going to try to sort out the ghc-doc problem today. Tomorrow I go on vacation until the 13th, so I won't be fixing anything then :-)

1 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 452066] New: Package update request: darcs 2
by Red Hat Bugzilla 22 Jun '08

22 Jun '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452066 Summary: Package update request: darcs 2 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: darcs AssignedTo: jeremy(a)hinegardner.org ReportedBy: bos(a)serpentine.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-haskell-list@redhat.com,petersen@redhat.com Darcs 2 has been available for several months, and is the supported stable version now. We should upgrade it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 2

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 451877] unconfined_execmem_exec_t needed for several GHC-built Haskell binaries
by Red Hat Bugzilla 22 Jun '08

22 Jun '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: unconfined_execmem_exec_t needed for several GHC-built Haskell binaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451877 ------- Additional Comments From bos(a)serpentine.com 2008-06-22 22:07 EST ------- The runtime system for programs compiled by GHC generates code dynamically and executes it. The interaction with SELinux's enforcing mode is a known problem, which was previously addressed with a hack: the %post scripts for Haskell programs were using chcon to add unconfined_exec_mem_t. This obviously didn't work in lots of circumstances, hence wanting to apply the policy properly. The underlying problem, namely the way GHC allocates memory that it intends to execute dynamically, should be fixed within the next six months or so. See http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/738 for details. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 451877] unconfined_execmem_exec_t needed for several GHC-built Haskell binaries
by Red Hat Bugzilla 22 Jun '08

22 Jun '08

1 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] failed to build gtk2hs
by Jens-Ulrik Petersen 22 Jun '08

22 Jun '08

I tried to update gtk2hs now that ghc-6.8.3 is in devel. The build fails like this: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=675810&name=build.log while trying to build c2hs. Perhaps we need to backport from upstream darcs to get it through? I may try that some point later. Jens

1 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 451877] unconfined_execmem_exec_t needed for several GHC-built Haskell binaries
by Red Hat Bugzilla 22 Jun '08

22 Jun '08

1 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

haskell-devel June 2008