haskell-devel April 2012

haskell-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

1 participants
170 discussions

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 737228] New: Review Request: ghc-data-default - A class for types with a default value
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 Aug '16

14 Aug '16

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ghc-data-default - A class for types with a default value https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737228 Summary: Review Request: ghc-data-default - A class for types with a default value Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com, package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Blocks: 648247 Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Spec file : http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-data-default.spec SRPM file : http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-data-default-0.3.0-1.fc… New dependency on ghc-dlist. rpmlint output: rpmlint -i ghc-data-default-0.3.0-1.fc14.i686.rpm ghc-data-default-0.3.0-1.fc14.src.rpm ghc-data-default-devel-0.3.0-1.fc14.i686.rpm 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 26

[Bug 803812] New: FTBS: build failure on PPC64, `IO' is applied to too many type arguments'
by Red Hat Bugzilla 27 Jul '15

27 Jul '15

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: FTBS: build failure on PPC64, `IO' is applied to too many type arguments' https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=803812 Summary: FTBS: build failure on PPC64, `IO' is applied to too many type arguments' Product: Fedora Version: 17 Platform: powerpc OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: high Priority: high Component: ghc-gio AssignedTo: petersen(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: karsten(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- Description of problem: [14 of 24] Compiling System.GIO.File.FileInfo ( dist/build/System/GIO/File/FileInfo.hs, dist/build/System/GIO/File/FileInfo.o ) System/GIO/File/FileInfo.chs:269:5: `IO' is applied to too many type arguments In the type signature for `fileInfoGetAttributeBool': fileInfoGetAttributeBool :: FileInfoClass info => info -> String -> IO Bool bool System/GIO/File/FileInfo.chs:278:5: `IO' is applied to too many type arguments In the type signature for `fileInfoGetAttributeWord32': fileInfoGetAttributeWord32 :: FileInfoClass info => info -> String -> IO Word32 bool System/GIO/File/FileInfo.chs:287:5: `IO' is applied to too many type arguments In the type signature for `fileInfoGetAttributeInt32': fileInfoGetAttributeInt32 :: FileInfoClass info => info -> String -> IO Int32 bool System/GIO/File/FileInfo.chs:296:5: `IO' is applied to too many type arguments In the type signature for `fileInfoGetAttributeWord64': fileInfoGetAttributeWord64 :: FileInfoClass info => info -> String -> IO Word64 bool System/GIO/File/FileInfo.chs:305:5: `IO' is applied to too many type arguments In the type signature for `fileInfoGetAttributeInt64': fileInfoGetAttributeInt64 :: FileInfoClass info => info -> String -> IO Int64 bool error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.sEL96Y (%build) Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): ghc-gio-0.12.2-1.fc17 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1.ppc-koji build --scratch f17 ghc-gio-0.12.2-1.fc17.src.rpm 2. 3. Actual results: http://ppc.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=439435 Expected results: Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 11

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 788515] New: cab-0.1.10 is available
by Red Hat Bugzilla 19 Jul '15

19 Jul '15

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: cab-0.1.10 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=788515 Summary: cab-0.1.10 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: cab AssignedTo: petersen(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- Latest upstream release: 0.1.10 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 0.1.9 URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/cab/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 40

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 635581] New: [gold] configure: error: curses library not found, so this package cannot be built
by Red Hat Bugzilla 17 Feb '15

17 Feb '15

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [gold] configure: error: curses library not found, so this package cannot be built https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=635581 Summary: [gold] configure: error: curses library not found, so this package cannot be built Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: ghc AssignedTo: petersen(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: mnowak(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, bos(a)serpentine.com, loupgaroublond(a)gmail.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: ghc-6.12.3-5.fc15.src.rpm rebuild with gold (the alternative linker in binutils) fails because configure script won't find curses: DEBUG: ncurses.x86_64 0:5.7-8.20100703.fc14 DEBUG: ncurses-base.x86_64 0:5.7-8.20100703.fc14 DEBUG: ncurses-libs.x86_64 0:5.7-8.20100703.fc14 DEBUG: ncurses-base.x86_64 0:5.7-8.20100703.fc14 DEBUG: ncurses-libs.x86_64 0:5.7-8.20100703.fc14 DEBUG: /usr/bin/yum --installroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root/ resolvedep ccache 'libffi-devel' 'gmp-devel' 'ghc-rpm-macros >= 0.8.0' 'ncurses-devel' 'python' 'docbook-style-xsl' 'ghc' 'libxslt' 'hscolour' 'happy' DEBUG: Executing command: /usr/bin/yum --installroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root/ resolvedep ccache 'libffi-devel' 'gmp-devel' 'ghc-rpm-macros >= 0.8.0' 'ncurses-devel' 'python' 'docbook-style-xsl' 'ghc' 'libxslt' 'hscolour' 'happy' --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts DEBUG: 0:ncurses-devel-5.7-8.20100703.fc14.x86_64 DEBUG: /usr/bin/yum --installroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root/ install ccache 'libffi-devel' 'gmp-devel' 'ghc-rpm-macros >= 0.8.0' 'ncurses-devel' 'python' 'docbook-style-xsl' 'ghc' 'libxslt' 'hscolour' 'happy' DEBUG: Executing command: /usr/bin/yum --installroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root/ install ccache 'libffi-devel' 'gmp-devel' 'ghc-rpm-macros >= 0.8.0' 'ncurses-devel' 'python' 'docbook-style-xsl' 'ghc' 'libxslt' 'hscolour' 'happy' --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts DEBUG: ncurses-devel x86_64 5.7-8.20100703.fc14 fedora 663 k DEBUG: libxslt.x86_64 0:1.1.26-3.fc14 ncurses-devel.x86_64 0:5.7-8.20100703.fc14 DEBUG: checking ncurses.h usability... yes DEBUG: checking ncurses.h presence... yes DEBUG: checking for ncurses.h... yes DEBUG: checking for setupterm in -lncursesw... no DEBUG: checking for setupterm in -lncurses... no Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): ghc-6.12.3-5.fc15 How reproducible: always (x86_64) Steps to Reproduce: 1. alternatives --config ld 2. set gold 3. rebuild ghc srpm Actual results: Expected results: DEBUG: ncurses.x86_64 0:5.7-8.20100703.fc14 DEBUG: ncurses-base.x86_64 0:5.7-8.20100703.fc14 DEBUG: ncurses-base.x86_64 0:5.7-8.20100703.fc14 DEBUG: ncurses-libs.x86_64 0:5.7-8.20100703.fc14 DEBUG: /usr/bin/yum --installroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root/ resolvedep ccache 'libffi-devel' 'gmp-devel' 'ghc-rpm-macros >= 0.8.0' 'ncurses-devel' 'python' 'docbook-style-xsl' 'ghc' 'libxslt' 'hscolour' 'happy' DEBUG: Executing command: /usr/bin/yum --installroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root/ resolvedep ccache 'libffi-devel' 'gmp-devel' 'ghc-rpm-macros >= 0.8.0' 'ncurses-devel' 'python' 'docbook-style-xsl' 'ghc' 'libxslt' 'hscolour' 'happy' --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts DEBUG: 0:ncurses-devel-5.7-8.20100703.fc14.x86_64 DEBUG: /usr/bin/yum --installroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root/ install ccache 'libffi-devel' 'gmp-devel' 'ghc-rpm-macros >= 0.8.0' 'ncurses-devel' 'python' 'docbook-style-xsl' 'ghc' 'libxslt' 'hscolour' 'happy' DEBUG: Executing command: /usr/bin/yum --installroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root/ install ccache 'libffi-devel' 'gmp-devel' 'ghc-rpm-macros >= 0.8.0' 'ncurses-devel' 'python' 'docbook-style-xsl' 'ghc' 'libxslt' 'hscolour' 'happy' --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts DEBUG: ncurses-devel x86_64 5.7-8.20100703.fc14 fedora 663 k DEBUG: libxslt.x86_64 0:1.1.26-3.fc14 ncurses-devel.x86_64 0:5.7-8.20100703.fc14 DEBUG: checking ncurses.h usability... yes DEBUG: checking ncurses.h presence... yes DEBUG: checking for ncurses.h... yes DEBUG: checking for setupterm in -lncursesw... yes Additional info: Since gold might be the default linker (per http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/GoldLinkerDefault) this problem might be worth fixing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 12

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 712270] New: Review Request: derive - A program and library to derive instances for data types
by Red Hat Bugzilla 12 Nov '14

12 Nov '14

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: derive - A program and library to derive instances for data types Alias: ghc-derive https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712270 Summary: Review Request: derive - A program and library to derive instances for data types Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Spec file : http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/derive.spec SRPM file : http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/derive-2.5.2-1.fc14.src.rpm Koji build : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3122647 rpmlint output: derive.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haskell -> Gaskell, Gaitskell, Skellum The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. derive.i686: W: name-repeated-in-summary C derive The name of the package is repeated in its summary. This is often redundant information and looks silly in various programs' output. Make the summary brief and to the point without including redundant information in it. derive.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary derive Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page. derive.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haskell -> Gaskell, Gaitskell, Skellum The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. derive.src: W: name-repeated-in-summary C derive The name of the package is repeated in its summary. This is often redundant information and looks silly in various programs' output. Make the summary brief and to the point without including redundant information in it. ghc-derive-prof.i686: E: devel-dependency ghc-derive-devel Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package itself. ghc-derive-prof.i686: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. ghc-derive-prof.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/ghc-7.0.2/derive-2.5.2/libHSderive-2.5.2_p.a A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. 5 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 7 warnings. Required for yi -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 20

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 712280] New: Review Request: ghc-ghc-mtl - A mtl compatible with GHC-API monads and monad-transformers
by Red Hat Bugzilla 12 Nov '14

12 Nov '14

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ghc-ghc-mtl - A mtl compatible with GHC-API monads and monad-transformers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712280 Summary: Review Request: ghc-ghc-mtl - A mtl compatible with GHC-API monads and monad-transformers Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com Depends on: 710045 Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Spec file : http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-ghc-mtl.spec SRPM link : http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-ghc-mtl-1.0.1.0-1.fc14.… rpmlint output: ghc-ghc-mtl-prof.i686: E: devel-dependency ghc-ghc-mtl-devel Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package itself. ghc-ghc-mtl-prof.i686: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. ghc-ghc-mtl-prof.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/ghc-6.12.3/ghc-mtl-1.0.1.0/libHSghc-mtl-1.0.1.0_p.a A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. Required for yi. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 26

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 664221] New: Review Request: ghc-cautious-file - Provides ways to write a file cautiously
by Red Hat Bugzilla 12 Nov '14

12 Nov '14

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ghc-cautious-file - Provides ways to write a file cautiously Alias: ghc-cautious-file https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664221 Summary: Review Request: ghc-cautious-file - Provides ways to write a file cautiously Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com Blocks: 634048 Classification: Fedora SPEC file link : https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-cautious-file.spec?… SRPM link : https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-cautious-file-0.1.5… rpmlint output: rpmlint -i *.rpm ../ghc-cautious-file.spec ghc-cautious-file.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US posix -> posit, pos ix, pos-ix The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-cautious-file.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US posix -> posit, pos ix, pos-ix The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-cautious-file-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US posix -> posit, pos ix, pos-ix The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-cautious-file-prof.x86_64: E: devel-dependency ghc-cautious-file-devel Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package itself. ghc-cautious-file-prof.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US posix -> posit, pos ix, pos-ix The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-cautious-file-prof.x86_64: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. ghc-cautious-file-prof.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/ghc-7.0.1/cautious-file-0.1.5/libHScautious-file-0.1.5_p.a A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 6 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 26

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 703503] New: Review Request: ghc-xdg-basedir - Haskell library implementing XDG base directory spec
by Red Hat Bugzilla 12 Nov '14

12 Nov '14

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ghc-xdg-basedir - Haskell library implementing XDG base directory spec Alias: ghc-xdg-basedir https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=703503 Summary: Review Request: ghc-xdg-basedir - Haskell library implementing XDG base directory spec Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Spec file: http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-xdg-basedir.spec SRPM link: http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-xdg-basedir-0.2-1.fc14.… -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 11

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 664151] New: Review Request: ghc-Diff - A O(ND) diff algorithm in Haskell
by Red Hat Bugzilla 22 Oct '14

22 Oct '14

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ghc-Diff - A O(ND) diff algorithm in Haskell Alias: ghc-Diff https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664151 Summary: Review Request: ghc-Diff - A O(ND) diff algorithm in Haskell Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora SPEC file URL: https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-Diff.spec?attredire… SRPM file URL: https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-Diff-0.1.2-1.fc14.s… rpmlint output: rpmlint -i ghc-Diff.spec ghc-Diff*fc15*.rpm ghc-Diff-prof.i686: E: devel-dependency ghc-Diff-devel Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package itself. ghc-Diff-prof.i686: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. ghc-Diff-prof.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/ghc-7.0.1/Diff-0.1.2/libHSDiff-0.1.2_p.a A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 34

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 712284] New: Review Request: ghc-hint - Library that provides interpreter monad
by Red Hat Bugzilla 25 Apr '14

25 Apr '14

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ghc-hint - Library that provides interpreter monad Alias: ghc-hint https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712284 Summary: Review Request: ghc-hint - Library that provides interpreter monad Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com Depends on: 712280 Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Spec file : http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-hint.spec SRPM file : http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-hint-0.3.3.2-1.fc14.src… rpmlint output: ghc-hint-prof.i686: E: devel-dependency ghc-hint-devel Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package itself. ghc-hint-prof.i686: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. ghc-hint-prof.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/ghc-6.12.3/hint-0.3.3.2/libHShint-0.3.3.2_p.a A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. Required for yi. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 20

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

haskell-devel April 2012