haskell-devel January 2011

haskell-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

6 participants
229 discussions

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 635581] New: [gold] configure: error: curses library not found, so this package cannot be built
by Red Hat Bugzilla 17 Feb '15

17 Feb '15

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [gold] configure: error: curses library not found, so this package cannot be built https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=635581 Summary: [gold] configure: error: curses library not found, so this package cannot be built Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: ghc AssignedTo: petersen(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: mnowak(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, bos(a)serpentine.com, loupgaroublond(a)gmail.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: ghc-6.12.3-5.fc15.src.rpm rebuild with gold (the alternative linker in binutils) fails because configure script won't find curses: DEBUG: ncurses.x86_64 0:5.7-8.20100703.fc14 DEBUG: ncurses-base.x86_64 0:5.7-8.20100703.fc14 DEBUG: ncurses-libs.x86_64 0:5.7-8.20100703.fc14 DEBUG: ncurses-base.x86_64 0:5.7-8.20100703.fc14 DEBUG: ncurses-libs.x86_64 0:5.7-8.20100703.fc14 DEBUG: /usr/bin/yum --installroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root/ resolvedep ccache 'libffi-devel' 'gmp-devel' 'ghc-rpm-macros >= 0.8.0' 'ncurses-devel' 'python' 'docbook-style-xsl' 'ghc' 'libxslt' 'hscolour' 'happy' DEBUG: Executing command: /usr/bin/yum --installroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root/ resolvedep ccache 'libffi-devel' 'gmp-devel' 'ghc-rpm-macros >= 0.8.0' 'ncurses-devel' 'python' 'docbook-style-xsl' 'ghc' 'libxslt' 'hscolour' 'happy' --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts DEBUG: 0:ncurses-devel-5.7-8.20100703.fc14.x86_64 DEBUG: /usr/bin/yum --installroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root/ install ccache 'libffi-devel' 'gmp-devel' 'ghc-rpm-macros >= 0.8.0' 'ncurses-devel' 'python' 'docbook-style-xsl' 'ghc' 'libxslt' 'hscolour' 'happy' DEBUG: Executing command: /usr/bin/yum --installroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root/ install ccache 'libffi-devel' 'gmp-devel' 'ghc-rpm-macros >= 0.8.0' 'ncurses-devel' 'python' 'docbook-style-xsl' 'ghc' 'libxslt' 'hscolour' 'happy' --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts DEBUG: ncurses-devel x86_64 5.7-8.20100703.fc14 fedora 663 k DEBUG: libxslt.x86_64 0:1.1.26-3.fc14 ncurses-devel.x86_64 0:5.7-8.20100703.fc14 DEBUG: checking ncurses.h usability... yes DEBUG: checking ncurses.h presence... yes DEBUG: checking for ncurses.h... yes DEBUG: checking for setupterm in -lncursesw... no DEBUG: checking for setupterm in -lncurses... no Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): ghc-6.12.3-5.fc15 How reproducible: always (x86_64) Steps to Reproduce: 1. alternatives --config ld 2. set gold 3. rebuild ghc srpm Actual results: Expected results: DEBUG: ncurses.x86_64 0:5.7-8.20100703.fc14 DEBUG: ncurses-base.x86_64 0:5.7-8.20100703.fc14 DEBUG: ncurses-base.x86_64 0:5.7-8.20100703.fc14 DEBUG: ncurses-libs.x86_64 0:5.7-8.20100703.fc14 DEBUG: /usr/bin/yum --installroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root/ resolvedep ccache 'libffi-devel' 'gmp-devel' 'ghc-rpm-macros >= 0.8.0' 'ncurses-devel' 'python' 'docbook-style-xsl' 'ghc' 'libxslt' 'hscolour' 'happy' DEBUG: Executing command: /usr/bin/yum --installroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root/ resolvedep ccache 'libffi-devel' 'gmp-devel' 'ghc-rpm-macros >= 0.8.0' 'ncurses-devel' 'python' 'docbook-style-xsl' 'ghc' 'libxslt' 'hscolour' 'happy' --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts DEBUG: 0:ncurses-devel-5.7-8.20100703.fc14.x86_64 DEBUG: /usr/bin/yum --installroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root/ install ccache 'libffi-devel' 'gmp-devel' 'ghc-rpm-macros >= 0.8.0' 'ncurses-devel' 'python' 'docbook-style-xsl' 'ghc' 'libxslt' 'hscolour' 'happy' DEBUG: Executing command: /usr/bin/yum --installroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root/ install ccache 'libffi-devel' 'gmp-devel' 'ghc-rpm-macros >= 0.8.0' 'ncurses-devel' 'python' 'docbook-style-xsl' 'ghc' 'libxslt' 'hscolour' 'happy' --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts DEBUG: ncurses-devel x86_64 5.7-8.20100703.fc14 fedora 663 k DEBUG: libxslt.x86_64 0:1.1.26-3.fc14 ncurses-devel.x86_64 0:5.7-8.20100703.fc14 DEBUG: checking ncurses.h usability... yes DEBUG: checking ncurses.h presence... yes DEBUG: checking for ncurses.h... yes DEBUG: checking for setupterm in -lncursesw... yes Additional info: Since gold might be the default linker (per http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/GoldLinkerDefault) this problem might be worth fixing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 12

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 664221] New: Review Request: ghc-cautious-file - Provides ways to write a file cautiously
by Red Hat Bugzilla 12 Nov '14

12 Nov '14

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ghc-cautious-file - Provides ways to write a file cautiously Alias: ghc-cautious-file https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664221 Summary: Review Request: ghc-cautious-file - Provides ways to write a file cautiously Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com Blocks: 634048 Classification: Fedora SPEC file link : https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-cautious-file.spec?… SRPM link : https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-cautious-file-0.1.5… rpmlint output: rpmlint -i *.rpm ../ghc-cautious-file.spec ghc-cautious-file.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US posix -> posit, pos ix, pos-ix The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-cautious-file.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US posix -> posit, pos ix, pos-ix The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-cautious-file-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US posix -> posit, pos ix, pos-ix The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-cautious-file-prof.x86_64: E: devel-dependency ghc-cautious-file-devel Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package itself. ghc-cautious-file-prof.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US posix -> posit, pos ix, pos-ix The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-cautious-file-prof.x86_64: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. ghc-cautious-file-prof.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/ghc-7.0.1/cautious-file-0.1.5/libHScautious-file-0.1.5_p.a A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 6 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 26

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 664151] New: Review Request: ghc-Diff - A O(ND) diff algorithm in Haskell
by Red Hat Bugzilla 22 Oct '14

22 Oct '14

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ghc-Diff - A O(ND) diff algorithm in Haskell Alias: ghc-Diff https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664151 Summary: Review Request: ghc-Diff - A O(ND) diff algorithm in Haskell Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora SPEC file URL: https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-Diff.spec?attredire… SRPM file URL: https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-Diff-0.1.2-1.fc14.s… rpmlint output: rpmlint -i ghc-Diff.spec ghc-Diff*fc15*.rpm ghc-Diff-prof.i686: E: devel-dependency ghc-Diff-devel Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package itself. ghc-Diff-prof.i686: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. ghc-Diff-prof.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/ghc-7.0.1/Diff-0.1.2/libHSDiff-0.1.2_p.a A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 34

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 664205] New: Review Request: ghc-dlist - Haskell package that provides difference lists
by Red Hat Bugzilla 03 Mar '14

03 Mar '14

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ghc-dlist - Haskell package that provides difference lists Alias: ghc-dlist https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664205 Summary: Review Request: ghc-dlist - Haskell package that provides difference lists Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com Blocks: 634048 Classification: Fedora SRPM link : https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-dlist-0.5-1.fc14.sr… SPEC file link : https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-dlist.spec?attredir… rpmlint output: rpmlint -i *.rpm ../ghc-dlist.spec ghc-dlist-prof.x86_64: E: devel-dependency ghc-dlist-devel Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package itself. ghc-dlist-prof.x86_64: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. ghc-dlist-prof.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/ghc-7.0.1/dlist-0.5/libHSdlist-0.5_p.a A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 28

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 639787] New: build darcs for EPEL-6
by Red Hat Bugzilla 02 Jan '14

02 Jan '14

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: build darcs for EPEL-6 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639787 Summary: build darcs for EPEL-6 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: darcs AssignedTo: jeremy(a)hinegardner.org ReportedBy: petersen(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, jeremy(a)hinegardner.org, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: SSIA: I think we should have darcs in EPEL-6. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 6

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 547867] New: %{ghc_version} desn't expand properly
by Red Hat Bugzilla 19 Aug '13

19 Aug '13

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: %{ghc_version} desn't expand properly https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547867 Summary: %{ghc_version} desn't expand properly Product: Fedora Version: 11 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: high Component: ghc-rpm-macros AssignedTo: loupgaroublond(a)gmail.com ReportedBy: jochen(a)herr-schmitt.de QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, loupgaroublond(a)gmail.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora I want to tryout ghc-6.12.1 on my system and have installed ghc-rpm-macros-0.3.0-1 on my system. Because I have trouble to compile my packages, I have try out the following command: $ rpm -q --eval '%{ghc_version}' and got the following output: error: Recursion depth(17) greater than max(16) 15< (empty) 14< (empty) 13< (empty) 12< (empty) 11< (empty) 10< (empty) 9< (empty) 8< (empty) 7< (empty) 6< (empty) 5< (empty) 4< (empty) 3< (empty) 2< (empty) 1< (empty) 0< (empty) If I type $ ghc --numeric-version I will get 6.12.1 which I expected for $ rpm -q --eval '%{ghc_version}' Best Regards: Jochen Schmitt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 6

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 655486] New: Review Request: ghc-recaptcha - A Haskell library to use reCAPTCHA service
by Red Hat Bugzilla 24 Jun '13

24 Jun '13

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ghc-recaptcha - A Haskell library to use reCAPTCHA service Alias: ghc-recaptcha https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=655486 Summary: Review Request: ghc-recaptcha - A Haskell library to use reCAPTCHA service Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora SPEC URL : https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-recaptcha.spec?attr… SRPM URL: https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-recaptcha-0.1-1.fc1… rpmlint output: rpmlint -i ghc-recaptcha-0.1-1.fc14.x86_64.rpm ghc-recaptcha-devel-0.1-1.fc14.x86_64.rpm ghc-recaptcha-prof-0.1-1.fc14.x86_64.rpm ../../SRPMS/ghc-recaptcha-0.1-1.fc14.src.rpm ghc-recaptcha.spec ghc-recaptcha.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US hs -> HS, sh, gs The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-recaptcha-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US hs -> HS, sh, gs The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-recaptcha-prof.x86_64: E: devel-dependency ghc-recaptcha-devel Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package itself. ghc-recaptcha-prof.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US hs -> HS, sh, gs The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-recaptcha-prof.x86_64: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. ghc-recaptcha-prof.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/ghc-6.12.3/recaptcha-0.1/libHSrecaptcha-0.1_p.a A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. ghc-recaptcha.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US hs -> HS, sh, gs The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 6 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 7

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 664208] New: Review Request: ghc-fingertree - Haskell package provides generic finger-tree structure
by Red Hat Bugzilla 24 Jun '13

24 Jun '13

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ghc-fingertree - Haskell package provides generic finger-tree structure Alias: ghc-fingertree https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664208 Summary: Review Request: ghc-fingertree - Haskell package provides generic finger-tree structure Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com Blocks: 634048 Classification: Fedora SRPM link: https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-fingertree-0.0.1.0-… SPEC file link: https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-fingertree.spec?att… rpmlint output: rpmlint -i *.rpm ../ghc-fingertree.spec ghc-fingertree-prof.x86_64: E: devel-dependency ghc-fingertree-devel Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package itself. ghc-fingertree-prof.x86_64: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. ghc-fingertree-prof.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/ghc-7.0.1/fingertree-0.0.1.0/libHSfingertree-0.0.1.0_p.a A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 13

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 660645] New: Review Request: ghc-monads-tf - A library to provide Monad classes using type families
by Red Hat Bugzilla 24 Jun '13

24 Jun '13

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ghc-monads-tf - A library to provide Monad classes using type families Alias: ghc-monads-tf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=660645 Summary: Review Request: ghc-monads-tf - A library to provide Monad classes using type families Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com Blocks: 634048 Classification: Fedora SPEC file URL : https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-monads-tf.spec?attr… SRPM URL : https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-monads-tf-0.1.0.0-1… -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 6

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 664155] New: Review Request: ghc-data-accessor-monads-fd - A package to access state in monads-fd State Monad
by Red Hat Bugzilla 24 Feb '13

24 Feb '13

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ghc-data-accessor-monads-fd - A package to access state in monads-fd State Monad https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664155 Summary: Review Request: ghc-data-accessor-monads-fd - A package to access state in monads-fd State Monad Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora SRPM URL : https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-data-accessor-monad… SPEC file URL : https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-data-accessor-monad… rpmlint output: rpmlint -i ghc-data-accessor-monads-fd*.rpm ghc-data-accessor-monads-fd.spec ghc-data-accessor-monads-fd-prof.i686: E: devel-dependency ghc-data-accessor-monads-fd-devel Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package itself. ghc-data-accessor-monads-fd-prof.i686: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. ghc-data-accessor-monads-fd-prof.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/ghc-6.12.3/data-accessor-monads-fd-0.2.0.2/libHSdata-accessor-monads-fd-0.2.0.2_p.a A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 13

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

haskell-devel January 2011