haskell-devel October 2009

haskell-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

3 participants
32 discussions

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 517197] New: Review Request: ghc-GLUT - bindings to the C GLUT library
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Oct '10

05 Oct '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ghc-GLUT - bindings to the C GLUT library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517197 Summary: Review Request: ghc-GLUT - bindings to the C GLUT library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bos(a)serpentine.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com Depends on: 517155 Classification: Fedora Bryan O'Sullivan <bos(a)serpentine.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? Spec: http://www.serpentine.com/bos/files/ghc-GLUT.spec SRPM: http://www.serpentine.com/bos/files/ghc-GLUT-2.1.1.2-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This package provides the Haskell GLUT library for ghc. This is a set of bindings to the C freeglut library. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 13

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 503250] New: Review Request: ghc-utf8-string - Support reading and writing UTF8 Strings
by Red Hat Bugzilla 15 Sep '10

15 Sep '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ghc-utf8-string - Support reading and writing UTF8 Strings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503250 Summary: Review Request: ghc-utf8-string - Support reading and writing UTF8 Strings Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Status Whiteboard: NotReady Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Clone Of: 426750 Spec URL: http://zoglesby.fedorapeople.org/ghc-hinotify.spec SRPM URL: http://zoglesby.fedorapeople.org/ghc-utf8-string-0.3.4-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This library provides a wrapper to the Linux Kernel's inotify feature,allowing applications to subscribe to notifications when a file is accessed or modified. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 36

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 509699] New: ~/.cabal/bin should be appended to PATH if available
by Red Hat Bugzilla 19 May '10

19 May '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: ~/.cabal/bin should be appended to PATH if available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509699 Summary: ~/.cabal/bin should be appended to PATH if available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: cabal-install AssignedTo: petersen(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: petersen(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: After installing cabal programs, it is annoying that they are not in PATH and one has to type the fully-qualified or relative path explicitly: eg ~/.cabal/bin/progname I think we can append ~/.cabal/bin to user's PATH if it exists. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 6

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 522953] New: update to darcs-2.3.0 stable cabal release
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 Mar '10

11 Mar '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: update to darcs-2.3.0 stable cabal release https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522953 Summary: update to darcs-2.3.0 stable cabal release Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: darcs AssignedTo: petersen(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: petersen(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, jeremy(a)hinegardner.org, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: darcs should be updated to 2.3.0 stable. Unfortunately this requires hashed-storage and haskeline to be added to fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 24

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 487012] New: Directory ownership problem: /etc/bash_completion.d
by Red Hat Bugzilla 19 Nov '09

19 Nov '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Directory ownership problem: /etc/bash_completion.d https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487012 Summary: Directory ownership problem: /etc/bash_completion.d Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: darcs AssignedTo: jeremy(a)hinegardner.org ReportedBy: michel.sylvan(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, jeremy(a)hinegardner.org, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Description of problem: darcs installs a script in /etc/bash_completion.d, but does not own the directory or Requires: bash-completion. Since the script can be considered a 'plug-in', and thus we should not force bash-completion on people who do not need it, the solution ought to be to simply own the directory in question. This is what bzr, git and rpmlint do. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): darcs-2.2.0-1.fc10 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Install darcs 2. rpm -ql darcs | grep bash Actual results: darcs does not own /etc/bash_completion.d but installs a file in it Expected results: darcs owns the directory as well Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 4

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 479800] Review Request: hlint - Provides Haskell Source Code Suggestions
by Red Hat Bugzilla 29 Oct '09

29 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479800 --- Comment #21 from Conrad Meyer <konrad(a)tylerc.org> 2009-10-29 22:23:59 EDT --- I emailed upstream about licensing; version bump: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/hlint.spec http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/hlint-1.6.11-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 479800] Review Request: hlint - Provides Haskell Source Code Suggestions
by Red Hat Bugzilla 29 Oct '09

29 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479800 --- Comment #20 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2009-10-29 21:15:32 EDT --- Latest version is now: http://hackage.haskell.org/package/hlint-1.6.11 (In reply to comment #19) > GPL+ is the default if they just specify "GPL". I can double check later today > or if you want to do it, that works too. Ok I looked over the sources and indeed no src headers. :-/ Could you please contact the author and ask him to add license headers to all the main source files - that should clarify the intent (which I guess is GPLv2+) but until then we probably have to go with GPL+... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 479800] Review Request: hlint - Provides Haskell Source Code Suggestions
by Red Hat Bugzilla 29 Oct '09

29 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479800 --- Comment #19 from Conrad Meyer <konrad(a)tylerc.org> 2009-10-29 12:52:08 EDT --- GPL+ is the default if they just specify "GPL". I can double check later today or if you want to do it, that works too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 479800] Review Request: hlint - Provides Haskell Source Code Suggestions
by Red Hat Bugzilla 29 Oct '09

29 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479800 --- Comment #18 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2009-10-29 05:37:25 EDT --- I haven't checked (yet) but is the License tag really GPL+? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 460974] Review Request: xmobar - status bar for X
by Red Hat Bugzilla 29 Oct '09

29 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460974 --- Comment #10 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2009-10-29 05:17:05 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=366582) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=366582) xmobar.spec-1.patch You don't need doc/prof for a binary only package, plus other minor fixes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

haskell-devel October 2009