haskell-devel March 2010

haskell-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

6 participants
24 discussions

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 547867] New: %{ghc_version} desn't expand properly
by Red Hat Bugzilla 19 Aug '13

19 Aug '13

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: %{ghc_version} desn't expand properly https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547867 Summary: %{ghc_version} desn't expand properly Product: Fedora Version: 11 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: high Component: ghc-rpm-macros AssignedTo: loupgaroublond(a)gmail.com ReportedBy: jochen(a)herr-schmitt.de QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, loupgaroublond(a)gmail.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora I want to tryout ghc-6.12.1 on my system and have installed ghc-rpm-macros-0.3.0-1 on my system. Because I have trouble to compile my packages, I have try out the following command: $ rpm -q --eval '%{ghc_version}' and got the following output: error: Recursion depth(17) greater than max(16) 15< (empty) 14< (empty) 13< (empty) 12< (empty) 11< (empty) 10< (empty) 9< (empty) 8< (empty) 7< (empty) 6< (empty) 5< (empty) 4< (empty) 3< (empty) 2< (empty) 1< (empty) 0< (empty) If I type $ ghc --numeric-version I will get 6.12.1 which I expected for $ rpm -q --eval '%{ghc_version}' Best Regards: Jochen Schmitt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 6

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 517197] New: Review Request: ghc-GLUT - bindings to the C GLUT library
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Oct '10

05 Oct '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ghc-GLUT - bindings to the C GLUT library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517197 Summary: Review Request: ghc-GLUT - bindings to the C GLUT library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bos(a)serpentine.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com Depends on: 517155 Classification: Fedora Bryan O'Sullivan <bos(a)serpentine.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? Spec: http://www.serpentine.com/bos/files/ghc-GLUT.spec SRPM: http://www.serpentine.com/bos/files/ghc-GLUT-2.1.1.2-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This package provides the Haskell GLUT library for ghc. This is a set of bindings to the C freeglut library. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 13

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 503250] New: Review Request: ghc-utf8-string - Support reading and writing UTF8 Strings
by Red Hat Bugzilla 15 Sep '10

15 Sep '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ghc-utf8-string - Support reading and writing UTF8 Strings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503250 Summary: Review Request: ghc-utf8-string - Support reading and writing UTF8 Strings Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Status Whiteboard: NotReady Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Clone Of: 426750 Spec URL: http://zoglesby.fedorapeople.org/ghc-hinotify.spec SRPM URL: http://zoglesby.fedorapeople.org/ghc-utf8-string-0.3.4-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This library provides a wrapper to the Linux Kernel's inotify feature,allowing applications to subscribe to notifications when a file is accessed or modified. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 36

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 509699] New: ~/.cabal/bin should be appended to PATH if available
by Red Hat Bugzilla 19 May '10

19 May '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: ~/.cabal/bin should be appended to PATH if available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509699 Summary: ~/.cabal/bin should be appended to PATH if available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: cabal-install AssignedTo: petersen(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: petersen(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: After installing cabal programs, it is annoying that they are not in PATH and one has to type the fully-qualified or relative path explicitly: eg ~/.cabal/bin/progname I think we can append ~/.cabal/bin to user's PATH if it exists. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 6

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 571478] New: ghc should obsolete ghc-utf8-string
by Red Hat Bugzilla 30 Apr '10

30 Apr '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: ghc should obsolete ghc-utf8-string https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571478 Summary: ghc should obsolete ghc-utf8-string Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: ghc AssignedTo: bos(a)serpentine.com ReportedBy: jochen(a)herr-schmitt.de QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, bos(a)serpentine.com, loupgaroublond(a)gmail.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Because the most current releases of ghc (F-13 and abouve) contains the ghc-utf8-string stuff, ghc should obsolete this package in a right way, so users can make a proper update to the new release of ghc without the usage of --nodeps. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 16

[Fedora-haskell-list] Building haskell-platform 2010 for F12
by A.J.Delaney＠brighton.ac.uk 28 Mar '10

28 Mar '10

Dear all, Given that F13 is just around the corner I should probably just upgrade. However, as a learning exercise I've been building the F13 haskell-platform packages on F12. Ghc from the F13 ghc.spec builds correctly and produces ghc-6.12.1-5.fc12.i686.rpm ghc-ghc-6.12.1-5.fc12.i686.rpm ghc-ghc-doc-6.12.1-5.fc12.i686.rpm ghc-libs-6.12.1-5.fc12.i686.rpm ghc-doc-6.12.1-5.fc12.i686.rpm ghc-ghc-devel-6.12.1-5.fc12.i686.rpm ghc-ghc-prof-6.12.1-5.fc12.i686.rpm ghc-prof-6.12.1-5.fc12.i686.rpm In order to build cabal-install I require ghc-HTTP which depends on libHSnetwork. I can't seem to find libHS* spec files in koji or http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewcvs/rpms/ Could someone point me towards this spec file? -- Aidan Delaney

2 1

[Fedora-haskell-list] Bringing up the latest HP release
by Bryan O'Sullivan 25 Mar '10

25 Mar '10

Jesper, do you need any help with that?

1 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 576482] Review Request: ghc-deepseq - Haskell library to fully evaluate data structures
by Red Hat Bugzilla 24 Mar '10

24 Mar '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576482 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |507684(F13Target) --- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2010-03-24 04:33:50 EDT --- koji scratch-build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2072100 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 576482] Review Request: ghc-deepseq - Haskell library to fully evaluate data structures
by Red Hat Bugzilla 24 Mar '10

24 Mar '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576482 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-haskell-list@redhat. | |com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

Re: [Fedora-haskell-list] New haskell packages for Fedora
by Jens-Ulrik Petersen 23 Mar '10

23 Mar '10

Hi Lakshmi, Haskell packaging contributions to Fedora are always welcome: cc'ing haskell-devel list. > I did some packaging work for a haskell project and in the process created rpms for some libraries as well. > I would like to submit them for Fedora 13. Can you let me know how to get started on this? Please cabal2spec for packaging cabal packages to Fedora. I recommend looking at the current packages to get a clear idea of how we are doing. And suggestions for improvements to our packaging are welcome too. > Am I supposed to get some accounts approved for this purpose? Yes, Haskell SIG is just a group of interested people working together on packaging Haskell for Fedora. > I couldn't get required information from Haskell SIG webpage and from haskell-devel list at fedora project as well. There is no special process for Haskell packages, except the Haskell Packaging Guidelines (which need some updating anyway) - you just follow the usual path to become a packager through sponsorship in the Package review process. You can also ask questions on our little #fedora-haskell channel: we have about one person in each of Asia, US, and Europe. Hope that helps, Jens

1 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

haskell-devel March 2010