java-devel November 2021

java-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

10 participants
4 discussions

Corretto?
by Matthew Miller 24 Nov '21

24 Nov '21

I'm curious about this: * https://github.com/amazonlinux/amazon-linux-2022/issues/15 * https://github.com/amazonlinux/amazon-linux-2022/issues/14 ... but have no idea about any of it. :) Anyone have opinions? -- Matthew Miller <mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org> Fedora Project Leader

4 4

Need help
by Orion Poplawski 12 Nov '21

12 Nov '21

I'm trying to get truth 1.0.1 to build in the buildroot, but it's having a test failure: [ERROR] Tests run: 6, Failures: 2, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.01 s <<< FAILURE! - in com.google.common.truth.CorrespondenceExceptionStoreTest [ERROR] com.google.common.truth.CorrespondenceExceptionStoreTest.describeAsMainCause_notEmpty Time elapsed: 0.009 s <<< FAILURE! com.google.common.truth.AssertionErrorWithFacts: expected to match: compare$null, 123$ threw java.lang.NullPointerException\s+at com\.google\.common\.truth\.TestCorrespondences(.|\n)*\n--- but was: compare(null, 123) threw java.lang.NullPointerException: Cannot invoke "java.lang.Integer.intValue()" because "actual" is null at com.google.common.truth.TestCorrespondences$3.apply(TestCorrespondences.java:77) at com.google.common.truth.TestCorrespondences$3.apply(TestCorrespondences.java:74) at com.google.common.truth.Correspondence$FromBinaryPredicate.compare(Correspondence.java:150) at com.google.common.truth.Correspondence$FormattingDiffs.compare(Correspondence.java:389) --- at com.google.common.truth.CorrespondenceExceptionStoreTest.assertExpectedFacts(CorrespondenceExceptionStoreTest.java:106) at com.google.common.truth.CorrespondenceExceptionStoreTest.describeAsMainCause_notEmpty(CorrespondenceExceptionStoreTest.java:64) [ERROR] com.google.common.truth.CorrespondenceExceptionStoreTest.describeAsAdditionalInfo_notEmpty Time elapsed: 0 s <<< FAILURE! com.google.common.truth.AssertionErrorWithFacts: expected to match: compare$null, 123$ threw java.lang.NullPointerException\s+at com\.google\.common\.truth\.TestCorrespondences(.|\n)*\n--- but was: compare(null, 123) threw java.lang.NullPointerException: Cannot invoke "java.lang.Integer.intValue()" because "actual" is null at com.google.common.truth.TestCorrespondences$3.apply(TestCorrespondences.java:77) at com.google.common.truth.TestCorrespondences$3.apply(TestCorrespondences.java:74) at com.google.common.truth.Correspondence$FromBinaryPredicate.compare(Correspondence.java:150) at com.google.common.truth.Correspondence$FormattingDiffs.compare(Correspondence.java:389) --- at com.google.common.truth.CorrespondenceExceptionStoreTest.assertExpectedFacts(CorrespondenceExceptionStoreTest.java:106) at com.google.common.truth.CorrespondenceExceptionStoreTest.describeAsAdditionalInfo_notEmpty(CorrespondenceExceptionStoreTest.java:79) but it builds fine in my rawhide VM. But it's not obvious to me what might be different or what's triggering this. Any help greatly appreciated. -- Orion Poplawski he/him/his - surely the least important thing about me Manager of NWRA Technical Systems 720-772-5637 NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane orion(a)nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 https://www.nwra.com/

3 4

Maven and Ant dependencies ported to Java 17
by Mikolaj Izdebski 03 Nov '21

03 Nov '21

Hello, I've ported all my packages to be buildable with OpenJDK 17. I have not pushed the changes to dist-git yet, but I will do it before the end of the week. I wanted to share common problems I encountered and solutions I came up with. I hope that this will help others trying to port their packages. Problem 1: Compiler source/target levels 1.6 are no longer supported Solution: Bump source/target levels to 1.7 or 1.8 Packages affected: - apache-commons-beanutils - apache-commons-collections - apache-commons-jxpath - apache-commons-logging - apache-commons-net - apiguardian - atinject - bsf - cglib - java_cup - jdom - jdom2 - jsch - junit - jzlib - maven-file-management - maven-plugin-testing - maven-shared-io - munge-maven-plugin - opentest4j - osgi-annotation - plexus-build-api - qdox - sisu-mojos - xalan-j2 - xbean - xml-commons-apis Problem 2: Tests that use reflection fail with <<module java.base does not "opens java.lang">> or similar error Solution: Run tests with appropriate --add-opens parameter passed to JVM Packages affected: - easymock - mockito - xmvn Problem 3: Code does not recognize Java bytecode version 61.0 Solution: Update to newer upstream version that supports newer Java bytecode. Package affected: - objectweb-asm Problem 4: Code is compiled with -Werror passed to javac, but OpenJDK 17 introduces new warnings Solution: Do not pass -Werror to Java compiler Package affected: - jakarta-mail Problem 5: Wildcard imports are used in the code, but OpenJDK 17 introduces new classes that cause import ambiguity Solution: Add explicit imports Package affected: - univocity-parsers Packages that needed changes to make RPM Java packaging tooling to work with OpenJDK 17: - javapackages-bootstrap - javapackages-tools - maven -- Mikolaj

3 5

JDK 17 release package
by Devin Smith 02 Nov '21

02 Nov '21

Would it be possible to create the `java-17-openjdk` and related packages given that JDK 17 is an LTS release? Even though I can "install" against `java-17-openjdk`, I see that it targets the rolling latest release `java-latest-openjdk`.

2 1

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

java-devel November 2021