Hello!
toatal packages: 610 passed: 427 failed: 176
From the failures, there is 29 which passed in the copr before, and now are thus failing from two reasons - unrelated change, or non-intel64-arch failure. I will put this to FTBF bugs for those 29 pacakges,
In Monday, or as other duties allows I will fill FTBFS bugs for failures with straces and reproduce steps. In default CC will be, me, Severin, decathrope and java-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org.
Note that during non-sidetag rebuild during fedora 33 branching in start of August, we can expect some indirect dependencies to fail.
Thoughts?
J.
On Sat, 11 Jul 2020 at 09:24, Jiri Vanek jvanek@redhat.com wrote:
Hello!
toatal packages: 610 passed: 427 failed: 176
From the failures, there is 29 which passed in the copr before, and now
are thus failing from two
reasons - unrelated change, or non-intel64-arch failure. I will put this
to FTBF bugs for those 29
pacakges,
In Monday, or as other duties allows I will fill FTBFS bugs for failures
with straces and reproduce
steps. In default CC will be, me, Severin, decathrope and
java-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org.
Note that during non-sidetag rebuild during fedora 33 branching in start
of August, we can expect
some indirect dependencies to fail.
Thoughts?
A cursory glance shows that some failed with network problems. E.g. plexus-velocity failed with this:
DEBUG util.py:621: Errors during downloading metadata for repository 'build': DEBUG util.py:621: - Curl error (18): Transferred a partial file for http://kojipkgs-cache01.s390.fedoraproject.org/repos/f33-java11/1710873/s390... [transfer closed with 23617146 bytes remaining to read]
(Sigh, flakey s390x machines, we meet again.)
When I retriggered the build it succeeded: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1540681
Might be worth a retry of other failures before filing FTBFS bugs.
A cursory glance shows that some failed with network problems. E.g. plexus-velocity failed with this:
DEBUG util.py:621: Errors during downloading metadata for repository 'build': DEBUG util.py:621: - Curl error (18): Transferred a partial file for http://kojipkgs-cache01.s390.fedoraproject.org/repos/f33-java11/1710873/s390... [transfer closed with 23617146 bytes remaining to read]
(Sigh, flakey s390x machines, we meet again.)
When I retriggered the build it succeeded: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1540681
Might be worth a retry of other failures before filing FTBFS bugs.
Thanx!
Will elaborate on this!
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Mon, 13 Jul 2020 at 19:14, Jiri Vanek jvanek@redhat.com wrote:
A cursory glance shows that some failed with network problems. E.g.
plexus-velocity failed with this:
DEBUG util.py:621: Errors during downloading metadata for repository
'build':
DEBUG util.py:621: - Curl error (18): Transferred a partial file for
http://kojipkgs-cache01.s390.fedoraproject.org/repos/f33-java11/1710873/s390...
[transfer closed with 23617146 bytes remaining to read]
(Sigh, flakey s390x machines, we meet again.)
When I retriggered the build it succeeded:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1540681
Might be worth a retry of other failures before filing FTBFS bugs.
Thanx!
Will elaborate on this!
Any update? Any thoughts on when you want to merge the f33-java11 side tag back into rawhide?
On Wed, 15 Jul 2020 at 16:54, Mat Booth fedora@matbooth.co.uk wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jul 2020 at 19:14, Jiri Vanek jvanek@redhat.com wrote:
A cursory glance shows that some failed with network problems. E.g.
plexus-velocity failed with this:
DEBUG util.py:621: Errors during downloading metadata for repository
'build':
DEBUG util.py:621: - Curl error (18): Transferred a partial file
for
http://kojipkgs-cache01.s390.fedoraproject.org/repos/f33-java11/1710873/s390...
[transfer closed with 23617146 bytes remaining to read]
(Sigh, flakey s390x machines, we meet again.)
When I retriggered the build it succeeded:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1540681
Might be worth a retry of other failures before filing FTBFS bugs.
Thanx!
Will elaborate on this!
Any update? Any thoughts on when you want to merge the f33-java11 side
tag back into rawhide?
BTW There are some packages, e.g. built by ant with no sauce/target level specified at all, that are built with Java 11-level bytecode.
This is bad because if there is a dependent package that requires Java 8 for some reason it won't work because the bytecode of one your dependencies is too new and cannot be interpreted by Java 8. In these cases
I am fixing such occurrences in the ```f33-java11``` build target as I encounter them -- just something to be aware of in case you see any UnsupportedClassVersionErrors.
-- Mat Booth http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora
Any update? Any thoughts on when you want to merge the f33-java11 side tag back into rawhide?
done
BTW There are some packages, e.g. built by ant with no sauce/target level specified at all, that are built with Java 11-level bytecode.
This is bad because if there is a dependent package that requires Java 8 for some reason it won't work because the bytecode of one your dependencies is too new and cannot be interpreted by Java 8. In these cases
I am fixing such occurrences in the ```f33-java11``` build target as I encounter them -- just something to be aware of in case you see any UnsupportedClassVersionErrors.
Mat, I had come to same conclusion, which had lead me into this: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/javapackages-tools/pull-request/3#comment... . Please contriute, or sugest next steps here. I would liek to have it java-packaging gudelines change, and self-contained f33 change, but it may be to late.
I see yo already track the Fabio's to-high bytecode issue, but my proposal is to prevent it in future. However, it do not seem to be facing to much sympathies.
J.
Hi!
Side tag was merged, java-11-openjdk now should be system JDK. Don't hesitate to reach me if you encounter some misbehaving!
J.
On 7/11/20 10:24 AM, Jiri Vanek wrote:
Hello!
toatal packages: 610 passed: 427 failed: 176
From the failures, there is 29 which passed in the copr before, and now are thus failing from two reasons - unrelated change, or non-intel64-arch failure. I will put this to FTBF bugs for those 29 pacakges,
In Monday, or as other duties allows I will fill FTBFS bugs for failures with straces and reproduce steps. In default CC will be, me, Severin, decathrope and java-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org.
Note that during non-sidetag rebuild during fedora 33 branching in start of August, we can expect some indirect dependencies to fail.
Thoughts?
J.
java-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
Jiri Vanek -
Mat Booth