Is the requirement of javadoc for eclipse-platform really necessary? javadoc is huge!
235M /usr/share/javadoc/
I'm just looking for a small eclipse CDT install....
* Orion Poplawski orion@cora.nwra.com [2006-04-11 12:34]:
Is the requirement of javadoc for eclipse-platform really necessary? javadoc is huge!
What do you mean? You mean you don't want the docs as part of the platform? This is part of the classic debate about whether we split packages into super-small pieces or keep them relatively close to their upstream downloadable counterparts. I've tended to favour the latter but I'm not married to that way of doing things.
/usr/share/javadoc isn't relevant here.
Andrew
Andrew Overholt wrote:
- Orion Poplawski orion@cora.nwra.com [2006-04-11 12:34]:
Is the requirement of javadoc for eclipse-platform really necessary? javadoc is huge!
What do you mean? You mean you don't want the docs as part of the platform? This is part of the classic debate about whether we split packages into super-small pieces or keep them relatively close to their upstream downloadable counterparts. I've tended to favour the latter but I'm not married to that way of doing things.
/usr/share/javadoc isn't relevant here.
Andrew
Well, it is, but I suppose not directly:
[root@cynosure ~]# du -sh /usr/share/javadoc/java-1.4.2-gcj-compat-1.4.2.0 235M /usr/share/javadoc/java-1.4.2-gcj-compat-1.4.2.0 [root@cynosure ~]# rpm -e java-1.4.2-gcj-compat-javadoc error: Failed dependencies: java-javadoc is needed by (installed) eclipse-platform-3.1.2-1jpp_13fc.i386 [root@cynosure ~]# rpm -e eclipse-platform error: Failed dependencies: eclipse-platform is needed by (installed) eclipse-cdt-3.0.2-1jpp_2fc.i386 eclipse-platform >= 1:3.1.2 is needed by (installed) eclipse-cdt-3.0.2-1jpp_2fc.i386 eclipse-platform < 1:3.1.3 is needed by (installed) eclipse-cdt-3.0.2-1jpp_2fc.i386
If I'm only going to be programming with eclipse in C/C++/Fortran using the CDT, I don't want a *LOT* (235MB!) of Java API documentation as well.
* Orion Poplawski orion@cora.nwra.com [2006-04-12 12:30]:
If I'm only going to be programming with eclipse in C/C++/Fortran using the CDT, I don't want a *LOT* (235MB!) of Java API documentation as well.
Okay, I think I have a solution. We need to put the ISV docs into the -devel packages. The user docs don't have the API docs and therefore don't have the java-javadoc (java-1.4.2-gcj-compat-javadoc here) dependency for symlinks.
Can you file a bug to track this?
Thanks,
Andrew
Andrew Overholt wrote:
Okay, I think I have a solution. We need to put the ISV docs into the -devel packages. The user docs don't have the API docs and therefore don't have the java-javadoc (java-1.4.2-gcj-compat-javadoc here) dependency for symlinks.
Can you file a bug to track this?
Thanks,
Andrew
Can I ever!
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188724
Thanks!
* Orion Poplawski orion@cora.nwra.com [2006-04-12 12:44]:
Andrew Overholt wrote:
Okay, I think I have a solution. We need to put the ISV docs into the -devel packages. The user docs don't have the API docs and therefore don't have the java-javadoc (java-1.4.2-gcj-compat-javadoc here) dependency for symlinks.
Can you file a bug to track this?
Can I ever!
Giddy-up, thanks.
Thanks!
No problem.
Andrew
java-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org