infrastructure August 2021

infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org

15 participants
20 discussions

About JS framework
by Pierre-Yves Chibon 14 Sep '22

14 Sep '22

Good Morning Everyone, Our infrastructure is mostly a python store, meaning almost all our apps are written in python and most using wsgi. However in python we are using a number of framework: * flask for most * pyramid for some of the biggest (bodhi, FAS3) * Django (askbot, Hyperkitty) * TurboGears2 (fedora-packages) * aiohttp (python3, async app: mdapi) While this makes sometime things difficult, these are fairly standard framework and most of our developers are able to help on all. However, as I see us starting to look at JS for some of our apps (fedora-hubs, wartaa...), I wonder if we could start the discussion early about the different framework and eventually see if we can unify around one. This would also allow those of us not familiar with any JS framework to look at the recommended one instead of picking one up semi-randomly. So has anyone experience with one or more JS framework? Do you have one that would you recommend? Why? Thanks for your inputs, Pierre

15 19

Infrastructure and release engineering Documentation
by Mark O'Brien 09 Nov '21

09 Nov '21

Hi All, As some of you may be aware there has been chatter around having the documentation for infrastructure and release engineering centralised in one place. A possible solution to this is to move all of these under a new section on docs.fedoraproject.org called something like Infrastructure and Release Engineering (very original I know). We could then go about moving docs which are suitable from currrent locations to the new central point. Each doc should be updated before moving and the old document should be updated to only contain a link to the new doc to avoid a case of multiple versions of a doc (https://xkcd.com/927/ ). The following links contain the bulk of the documentation: https://fedora-infra-docs.readthedocs.io/en/latest/ https://docs.pagure.org/releng/ https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure These would be the suggested first steps with other docs to follow if/when these are completed. As I say this is just a possible solution so as always all feedback and suggestions are encouraged and welcomed. Thanks, Mark

4 8

Update hyperkitty to latest?
by Reon Beon 12 Oct '21

12 Oct '21

https://release-monitoring.org/project/53453/

2 2

Fedora 35 Beta Freeze now in effect
by Kevin Fenzi 29 Sep '21

29 Sep '21

Greetings. We are now in the infrastructure freeze leading up to the Fedora 35 Beta release. This is a pre release freeze. We do this to ensure that our infrastructure is stable and ready to release the Fedora 34 Beta when it's available. You can see a list of hosts that do not freeze by checking out the ansible repo and running the freezelist script: git clone https://infrastructure.fedoraproject.org/infra/ansible.git ansible/scripts/freezelist -i inventory Any hosts listed as freezes is frozen until 2021-09-14 (or later if release slips). Frozen hosts should have no changes made to them without a sign-off on the change from at least 2 sysadmin-main or rel-eng members, along with (in most cases) a patch of the exact change to be made to this list or a pull request for review. Thanks, Kevin

1 2

Can we update fedora-repo-zdicts on the branched and rawhide composers?
by Jonathan Dieter 09 Sep '21

09 Sep '21

Since branching, I've put out a new version of fedora-repo-zdicts with dictionaries for F35 and updated dictionaries for Rawhide. This version (2108.1) is now available in all active Fedora/EPEL branches, I think. Can we update fedora-repo-zdicts on the branched and rawhide composers so they get the latest dictionaries when creating the repodata? Or do we need to wait until the beta freeze ends? Thanks, Jonathan

4 4

Fedora Badges status
by Ryan Lerch 03 Sep '21

03 Sep '21

Just wondering if there is anyone around here that is actively (or semi-actively) maintaining the Fedora Badges system(s). The reason for this query is that we are currently working on the datanommer / datagrepper transition to Fedora Messaging, and Fedora Badges is revealing itself to be a special side-case. The majority of applications use the datagrepper JSON API to interact with the store of messages that datanommer stuffs into its database. However, badges appears to have direct access to the datanommer DB using the datanommer.models module (which we use in datagrepper too, obviously) Note too that FMN also hase this direct access rather than using datanommer This in of itself doesnt seem to be a huge issue to the migration, as the grep method of datanommer.models has not changed its API (which is all these apps use to get data with), so in theory, we just need to update datanommer.models on these applications and everything should be hunky-dory. However, neither of these applications are running currently on staging, so there is nowhere fo us to test this out. Long story long, just wondering if anyone is aware of any activeish maintainers of these items so we can discuss further. cheers, ryanlerch

7 17

metrics-for-apps: DNS patch for two prod workers of OCP cluster
by Akashdeep Dhar 01 Sep '21

01 Sep '21

Hello, Can we please get this patch[0] reviewed and merged for the prod workers of the OCP cluster? https://gist.github.com/davidkirwan/bd2b84f05a67123a9254e055d336f1e7 Thanks and regards, Akashdeep Dhar t0xic0der(a)fedoraproject.org

5 8

FBR: add ipa host group for openshift hosts
by Mark O'Brien 31 Aug '21

31 Aug '21

Hi All, I have a Freeze break request for review. I would like to add a host group for the openshift hosts in ipa so that we can give access to the sysadmin-openshift team. https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/ansible/pull-request/768# Any +1's from sysadmin-main/releng greatly appreciated p.s. if this sounds familiar to you it is because this pull request was supposed to do that originally but I didn't realise the hostgroup didn't yet exist Mark

2 1

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Websites & Apps Team Meeting
by jflory7＠fedoraproject.org 30 Aug '21

30 Aug '21

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: Websites & Apps Team Meeting on 2021-08-31 from 15:00:00 to 16:00:00 UTC At https://meet.jit.si/fedora-websites-apps-meeting The meeting will be about: Weekly team meeting for the Websites & Apps Team. This is part of the [Websites & Apps Community Revamp Objective](https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Objectives/Websites_%26_Apps_Comm…. See [past discussion]( https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/planning-meeting-for-websites-apps-t…) to learn more about the Websites & Apps Team and how it came together. More information available at: [hackmd.io/Mxm2We3yTqKybLsdohadOA](https://hackmd.io/Mxm2We3yTqKybLsdohadOA?view) Source: https://calendar.fedoraproject.org//meeting/9990/

1 0

Freeze Break Request: increase memory on s390x kvm builders
by Kevin Fenzi 27 Aug '21

27 Aug '21

Not long ago we were given more memory and disk space for our s390x kvm lpar (logical partition). I have on my list to redo those builders and figure out the best number to have and what resources, etc... I still plan to do this after beta freeze. In the mean time some packagers are hitting out of memory conditions on those builders and the memory is there idle, so I'd like to just double all the memory on them. This would entail: * disable buildvm-s390x-15 to buildvm-s390x-24 in koji * wait for all ongoing jobs to finish, or just free them * take all those buildvm's down and double memory in their config * bring back up and re-enable in koji. Should be a quick and easy thing, will help packagers now and shouldn't break anything. Can I get +1s from sysadmin-main or releng folks? kevin

3 2

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

infrastructure August 2021