[PATCH 1/2] bodhi-pungi: F32 will be the next "branched" [PATCH 2/2] bodhi-pungi: enable aarch64 and ppc64le for silverblue
Now that F31 is a go we need to do a few things. One of them is enabling other architectures, which was done in rawhide and f31. This propagates it into bodhi.
Now that f31 is go we can use the final location for ostree repo input. Bump the variable so that it will only look at branched for f32. --- roles/bodhi2/backend/templates/pungi.rpm.conf.j2 | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/roles/bodhi2/backend/templates/pungi.rpm.conf.j2 b/roles/bodhi2/backend/templates/pungi.rpm.conf.j2 index 688badeee..28b524a10 100644 --- a/roles/bodhi2/backend/templates/pungi.rpm.conf.j2 +++ b/roles/bodhi2/backend/templates/pungi.rpm.conf.j2 @@ -179,8 +179,8 @@ ostree = { # In the case of testing, also inject the last stable updates "https://kojipkgs%7B%7B env_suffix }}.fedoraproject.org/compose/updates/f[[ release.version_int ]]-updates/compose/Everything/$basearch/os/", [% endif %] - # For f31 the compose location is going to be under /compose/branched/ - [% if release.version_int == 31 %] + # For F32 the compose location is going to be under /compose/branched/ + [% if release.version_int == 32 %] "https://kojipkgs%7B%7B env_suffix }}.fedoraproject.org/compose/branched/latest-Fedora-[[ release.version_int ]]/compose/Everything/$basearch/os/" [% else %] "https://kojipkgs%7B%7B env_suffix }}.fedoraproject.org/compose/[[ release.version_int ]]/latest-Fedora-[[ release.version_int ]]/compose/Everything/$basearch/os/"
Just wondering, doesn't it affect rawhide composes, since rawhide is still 32?
On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 3:36 PM Dusty Mabe dusty@dustymabe.com wrote:
Now that f31 is go we can use the final location for ostree repo input. Bump the variable so that it will only look at branched for f32.
roles/bodhi2/backend/templates/pungi.rpm.conf.j2 | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/roles/bodhi2/backend/templates/pungi.rpm.conf.j2 b/roles/bodhi2/backend/templates/pungi.rpm.conf.j2 index 688badeee..28b524a10 100644 --- a/roles/bodhi2/backend/templates/pungi.rpm.conf.j2 +++ b/roles/bodhi2/backend/templates/pungi.rpm.conf.j2 @@ -179,8 +179,8 @@ ostree = { # In the case of testing, also inject the last stable updates "https://kojipkgs%7B%7B env_suffix }}.fedoraproject.org/compose/updates/f[[ release.version_int ]]-updates/compose/Everything/$basearch/os/", [% endif %]
# For f31 the compose location is going to be under /compose/branched/[% if release.version_int == 31 %]
# For F32 the compose location is going to be under /compose/branched/[% if release.version_int == 32 %] "https://kojipkgs{{ env_suffix }}.fedoraproject.org/compose/branched/latest-Fedora-[[ release.version_int ]]/compose/Everything/$basearch/os/" [% else %] "https://kojipkgs{{ env_suffix }}.fedoraproject.org/compose/[[ release.version_int ]]/latest-Fedora-[[ release.version_int ]]/compose/Everything/$basearch/os/"-- 2.20.1 _______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedorapro...
On 10/24/19 4:02 PM, Mohan Boddu wrote:
Just wondering, doesn't it affect rawhide composes, since rawhide is still 32?
IIUC the first time this will take any effect is when we start calling bodhi with '32' as the number (i.e. after we have branched and rawhide is now 33).
Dusty
No, with rawhide gating we are using bodhi to push rawhide builds as updates, I think it might call it and cause some issues.
On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 4:05 PM Dusty Mabe dusty@dustymabe.com wrote:
On 10/24/19 4:02 PM, Mohan Boddu wrote:
Just wondering, doesn't it affect rawhide composes, since rawhide is still 32?
IIUC the first time this will take any effect is when we start calling bodhi with '32' as the number (i.e. after we have branched and rawhide is now 33).
Dusty
Since rawhide is not uses pungi, I think we are okay with this change.
+1 LGTM
On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 4:13 PM Mohan Boddu mboddu@bhujji.com wrote:
No, with rawhide gating we are using bodhi to push rawhide builds as updates, I think it might call it and cause some issues.
On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 4:05 PM Dusty Mabe dusty@dustymabe.com wrote:
On 10/24/19 4:02 PM, Mohan Boddu wrote:
Just wondering, doesn't it affect rawhide composes, since rawhide is still 32?
IIUC the first time this will take any effect is when we start calling bodhi with '32' as the number (i.e. after we have branched and rawhide is now 33).
Dusty
+1 for the same reason.
-re
On 2019-10-24 16:23, Mohan Boddu wrote:
Since rawhide is not uses pungi, I think we are okay with this change.
+1 LGTM
On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 4:13 PM Mohan Boddu mboddu@bhujji.com wrote:
No, with rawhide gating we are using bodhi to push rawhide builds as updates, I think it might call it and cause some issues.
On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 4:05 PM Dusty Mabe dusty@dustymabe.com wrote:
On 10/24/19 4:02 PM, Mohan Boddu wrote:
Just wondering, doesn't it affect rawhide composes, since rawhide is still 32?
IIUC the first time this will take any effect is when we start calling bodhi with '32' as the number (i.e. after we have branched and rawhide is now 33).
Dusty
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedorapro...
Thanks! pushed!
On 10/24/19 5:10 PM, Rick Elrod wrote:
+1 for the same reason.
-re
On 2019-10-24 16:23, Mohan Boddu wrote:
Since rawhide is not uses pungi, I think we are okay with this change.
+1 LGTM
On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 4:13 PM Mohan Boddu mboddu@bhujji.com wrote:
No, with rawhide gating we are using bodhi to push rawhide builds as updates, I think it might call it and cause some issues.
On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 4:05 PM Dusty Mabe dusty@dustymabe.com wrote:
On 10/24/19 4:02 PM, Mohan Boddu wrote:
Just wondering, doesn't it affect rawhide composes, since rawhide is still 32?
IIUC the first time this will take any effect is when we start calling bodhi with '32' as the number (i.e. after we have branched and rawhide is now 33).
Dusty
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedorapro...
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedorapro...
--- roles/bodhi2/backend/templates/pungi.rpm.conf.j2 | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/roles/bodhi2/backend/templates/pungi.rpm.conf.j2 b/roles/bodhi2/backend/templates/pungi.rpm.conf.j2 index 28b524a10..640ddf058 100644 --- a/roles/bodhi2/backend/templates/pungi.rpm.conf.j2 +++ b/roles/bodhi2/backend/templates/pungi.rpm.conf.j2 @@ -193,8 +193,8 @@ ostree = { "ostree_ref": "fedora/[[ release.version_int ]]/${basearch}/testing/silverblue", [% endif %] "tag_ref": False, - "arches": ["x86_64"], - "failable": ["x86_64"] + "arches": ["x86_64", "ppc64le", "aarch64" ], + "failable": ["x86_64", "ppc64le", "aarch64" ] }, ] }
+1 LGTM
On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 3:36 PM Dusty Mabe dusty@dustymabe.com wrote:
roles/bodhi2/backend/templates/pungi.rpm.conf.j2 | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/roles/bodhi2/backend/templates/pungi.rpm.conf.j2 b/roles/bodhi2/backend/templates/pungi.rpm.conf.j2 index 28b524a10..640ddf058 100644 --- a/roles/bodhi2/backend/templates/pungi.rpm.conf.j2 +++ b/roles/bodhi2/backend/templates/pungi.rpm.conf.j2 @@ -193,8 +193,8 @@ ostree = { "ostree_ref": "fedora/[[ release.version_int ]]/${basearch}/testing/silverblue", [% endif %] "tag_ref": False,
"arches": ["x86_64"],"failable": ["x86_64"]
"arches": ["x86_64", "ppc64le", "aarch64" ],"failable": ["x86_64", "ppc64le", "aarch64" ] },}
2.20.1 _______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedorapro...
+1
-re
On 2019-10-24 15:51, Mohan Boddu wrote:
+1 LGTM
On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 3:36 PM Dusty Mabe dusty@dustymabe.com wrote:
roles/bodhi2/backend/templates/pungi.rpm.conf.j2 | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/roles/bodhi2/backend/templates/pungi.rpm.conf.j2 b/roles/bodhi2/backend/templates/pungi.rpm.conf.j2 index 28b524a10..640ddf058 100644 --- a/roles/bodhi2/backend/templates/pungi.rpm.conf.j2 +++ b/roles/bodhi2/backend/templates/pungi.rpm.conf.j2 @@ -193,8 +193,8 @@ ostree = { "ostree_ref": "fedora/[[ release.version_int ]]/${basearch}/testing/silverblue", [% endif %] "tag_ref": False,
"arches": ["x86_64"],"failable": ["x86_64"]
"arches": ["x86_64", "ppc64le", "aarch64" ],"failable": ["x86_64", "ppc64le", "aarch64" ] }, ]-- 2.20.1 _______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedorapro...
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedorapro...
infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
Dusty Mabe -
Mohan Boddu -
Rick Elrod