Hi,
Many URLs on fedora.redhat.com are currently broken. Worse, they are coming up as redirections to a CentOS http config.
First, http://fedora.redhat.com/download/mirrors/fedora-extras-i386 is failing:
Not Found The requested URL /download/mirrors/fedora-extras-i386 was not found on this server.
Apache/2.0.52 (CentOS) Server at fedora.redhat.com Port 80
and as this is the official mirrors list in the FC-5 fedora-release yum.repos.d, this breaks all FC-5 yum updates for anybody with -extras enabled.
And http://www.fedora.redhat.com/ is returning something similar:
Index of / Icon Name Last modified Size Description ________________________________________________________________ Apache/2.0.52 (CentOS) Server at www.fedora.redhat.com Port 80
--Stephen
Question: any reason why CentOS is used instead of FC? Or would it be in the same line as why OpenBSD website is using Solaris? ;-)
-----Original Message----- From: fedora-infrastructure-list-bounces@redhat.com [mailto:fedora-infrastructure-list-bounces@redhat.com] On Behalf Of Stephen C. Tweedie Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 11:38 PM To: fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com Cc: Stephen Tweedie; Warren Togami Subject: [Fedora-infrastructure-list] A couple of nasty breakages onfedora.redhat.com
Hi,
Many URLs on fedora.redhat.com are currently broken. Worse, they are coming up as redirections to a CentOS http config.
First, http://fedora.redhat.com/download/mirrors/fedora-extras-i386 is failing:
Not Found The requested URL /download/mirrors/fedora-extras-i386 was not found on this server. Apache/2.0.52 (CentOS) Server at fedora.redhat.com Port 80and as this is the official mirrors list in the FC-5 fedora-release yum.repos.d, this breaks all FC-5 yum updates for anybody with -extras enabled.
And http://www.fedora.redhat.com/ is returning something similar:
Index of / Icon Name Last modified Size Description
Apache/2.0.52 (CentOS) Server at www.fedora.redhat.com Port 80--Stephen
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
On Tue, 2006-10-24 at 10:07 +0300, Rino Mardo wrote:
Question: any reason why CentOS is used instead of FC? Or would it be in the same line as why OpenBSD website is using Solaris? ;-)
Yes, We didn't want to be upgrading the machine once a year.
-sv
On Tue, 24 Oct 2006, seth vidal wrote:
On Tue, 2006-10-24 at 10:07 +0300, Rino Mardo wrote:
Question: any reason why CentOS is used instead of FC? Or would it be in the same line as why OpenBSD website is using Solaris? ;-)
Yes, We didn't want to be upgrading the machine once a year.
CentOS is a distribution that is part of the Red Hat family, so it's still eating our own dog food. Seth is kind enough to host/manage fp.o for us. If CentOS is the distro that he wants to use, ok. It's 100% FOSS. Many Fedora contributors also contribute to CentOS. I'm fine with it all.
So would it be right to put some link in the admin site like who's hosting what using what OS. You know just to let the new comers know. We already have the donations link so I think a "thank-you-for-hosting" link is also needed.
2cents.
-----Original Message----- From: Max Spevack [mailto:mspevack@redhat.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2006 4:29 PM To: seth vidal Cc: Rino Mardo; 'Stephen C. Tweedie'; fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com; 'Warren Togami' Subject: RE: [Fedora-infrastructure-list] A couple of nasty breakages onfedora.redhat.com
On Tue, 24 Oct 2006, seth vidal wrote:
On Tue, 2006-10-24 at 10:07 +0300, Rino Mardo wrote:
Question: any reason why CentOS is used instead of FC? Or
would it be
in the same line as why OpenBSD website is using Solaris? ;-)
Yes, We didn't want to be upgrading the machine once a year.
CentOS is a distribution that is part of the Red Hat family, so it's still eating our own dog food. Seth is kind enough to host/manage fp.o for us. If CentOS is the distro that he wants to use, ok. It's 100% FOSS. Many Fedora contributors also contribute to CentOS. I'm fine with it all.
-- Max Spevack
- http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MaxSpevack
- gpg key -- http://spevack.org/max.asc
- fingerprint -- CD52 5E72 369B B00D 9E9A 773E 2FDB CB46 5A17 CF21
On 10/23/06, Stephen C. Tweedie sct@redhat.com wrote:
Hi,
Many URLs on fedora.redhat.com are currently broken. Worse, they are coming up as redirections to a CentOS http config.
First, http://fedora.redhat.com/download/mirrors/fedora-extras-i386 is failing:
Not Found The requested URL /download/mirrors/fedora-extras-i386 was not found on this server. Apache/2.0.52 (CentOS) Server at fedora.redhat.com Port 80and as this is the official mirrors list in the FC-5 fedora-release yum.repos.d, this breaks all FC-5 yum updates for anybody with -extras enabled.
And http://www.fedora.redhat.com/ is returning something similar:
Index of / Icon Name Last modified Size Description ________________________________________________________________ Apache/2.0.52 (CentOS) Server at www.fedora.redhat.com Port 80--Stephen
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Looks like it actually points to:
mirrorlist=http://fedora.redhat.com/download/mirrors/fedora-extras-$releasever
Which would be:
http://fedora.redhat.com/download/mirrors/fedora-extras-5
for future releases make sure you capitalize the 'D' in download.
-Mike
Hi,
On Tue, 2006-10-24 at 07:39 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
Looks like it actually points to:
mirrorlist=http://fedora.redhat.com/download/mirrors/fedora-extras-$releasever
Which would be:
Yes, I mistyped s/i386/5/ in the url in the email, but at the time of posting the correct url was broken in the same way, and yum updates were failing. It seems to be back up now, thanks.
Cheers, Stephen
infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
Max Spevack -
Mike McGrath -
Rino Mardo -
seth vidal -
Stephen C. Tweedie