On Thu, 2007-07-19 at 20:58 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:

John Poelstra wrote:

...

I took an action item at the FESCo meeting today to check with the infrastructure team to make sure you are in alignment and can service the needs of the Presto feature proposed for F8.

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/FeaturePresto

If there are any strong reasons why this feature should not be approved for F8, please add comments to the bottom of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/FeaturePresto by 2007-07-23.

Do we have a ballpark figure for how much space this will take up?

It adds about 10% more per package in rawhide/updates on average based on when I looked at doing it for FC6 updates right after F7 was released

Jeremy

On Fri, 20 Jul 2007 07:00:13 +0200 Florian La Roche laroche@redhat.com wrote:

For updates you might then need to ship more than the newest delta and they might add up.

The current plan as I understand it is to ship a delta from the GOLD release and from the previous update. So maximum of two deltas per package.

On Thu, 2007-07-19 at 22:37 -0400, Mike Bonnet wrote:

On Thu, 2007-07-19 at 16:36 -0700, John Poelstra wrote:

...

I took an action item at the FESCo meeting today to check with the infrastructure team to make sure you are in alignment and can service the needs of the Presto feature proposed for F8.

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/FeaturePresto

If there are any strong reasons why this feature should not be approved for F8, please add comments to the bottom of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/FeaturePresto by 2007-07-23.

Is support for generating/storing the deltarpms going to be added to Koji, or is it going to be a separate process? If it's a part of Koji, has someone committed to doing the required engineering work?

Yes and I talked with mikem at length about it last week and convinced him it was the way to go and he was going to look into it

Jeremy