Hi,
So sometime next week I'd like to link to the publictest10.fedoraproject.org/amber site and ask for feedback. In the meantime I'm going to install the latest changes on it, and load it up with all the data from F9. Just a heads-up, and a humble request not to break things (like the FAS instance I'm using) too much next week. If anyone has specific plans in that area, ping me and we can work things out.
Second, Fedora Applications/Amber is eventually going to need an actual production server ready around the Fedora 10 release date. I'd like to get to the point where I can make a formal request for aforementioned resources. What do I need to do to get there?
Thanks,
-RN
On Fri, 25 Jul 2008 14:07:41 -0400 Robin Norwood rnorwood@redhat.com wrote:
Second, Fedora Applications/Amber is eventually going to need an actual production server ready around the Fedora 10 release date. I'd like to get to the point where I can make a formal request for aforementioned resources. What do I need to do to get there?
Ping - what do I need to do to get moving on hosting resources for Amber/Fedora Applications? (Note: It hasn't yet been approved as a Feature, it's up for approval during Wednesday's FESCO meeting.
Ticket:
https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/666
-RN
On Tue, 12 Aug 2008, Robin Norwood wrote:
On Fri, 25 Jul 2008 14:07:41 -0400 Robin Norwood rnorwood@redhat.com wrote:
Second, Fedora Applications/Amber is eventually going to need an actual production server ready around the Fedora 10 release date. I'd like to get to the point where I can make a formal request for aforementioned resources. What do I need to do to get there?
Ping - what do I need to do to get moving on hosting resources for Amber/Fedora Applications? (Note: It hasn't yet been approved as a Feature, it's up for approval during Wednesday's FESCO meeting.
as in have it hosted in a production supported / backed-up instance at a location like https://admin.fedoraproject.org/amber/ ? If so work with your project sponsor.
-Mike
On Tue, 2008-08-12 at 13:23 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
On Tue, 12 Aug 2008, Robin Norwood wrote:
On Fri, 25 Jul 2008 14:07:41 -0400 Robin Norwood rnorwood@redhat.com wrote:
Second, Fedora Applications/Amber is eventually going to need an actual production server ready around the Fedora 10 release date. I'd like to get to the point where I can make a formal request for aforementioned resources. What do I need to do to get there?
Ping - what do I need to do to get moving on hosting resources for Amber/Fedora Applications? (Note: It hasn't yet been approved as a Feature, it's up for approval during Wednesday's FESCO meeting.
as in have it hosted in a production supported / backed-up instance at a location like https://admin.fedoraproject.org/amber/ ? If so work with your project sponsor.
Surely it'd be better suited as 'amber.fedoraproject.org', or something like that, hopefully I'll be back later today/tomorrow to help if needed.
(Note, we'd need to get the wildcard cert on the proxy servers first, but that's not too bigger deal)
-Mike
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
On 2008-08-13 12:29:55 PM, Nigel Jones wrote:
Surely it'd be better suited as 'amber.fedoraproject.org', or something like that, hopefully I'll be back later today/tomorrow to help if needed.
If it requires auth, we'll probably want it at admin.fedoraproject.org so that it can share cookies with our other applications.
Thanks, Ricky
On Tue, 12 Aug 2008, Ricky Zhou wrote:
On 2008-08-13 12:29:55 PM, Nigel Jones wrote:
Surely it'd be better suited as 'amber.fedoraproject.org', or something like that, hopefully I'll be back later today/tomorrow to help if needed.
If it requires auth, we'll probably want it at admin.fedoraproject.org so that it can share cookies with our other applications.
it is probably time to better describe what goes where and why. I'm fond of the admin.fedoraproject.org/blah/ for stuff. But if this is an application that end users will be using that doesn't seem quite right.
-Mike
On 2008-08-12 08:09:20 PM, Mike McGrath wrote:
it is probably time to better describe what goes where and why. I'm fond of the admin.fedoraproject.org/blah/ for stuff. But if this is an application that end users will be using that doesn't seem quite right.
Hmm, I wonder if this could lead into a discussion of whether FAS accounts are generally targetted towards 100% end users as well and if end user apps should have the possibility of separate auth (OpenID would be really cool for this).
Thanks, Ricky
On Tue, 12 Aug 2008 20:09:20 -0500 (CDT) Mike McGrath mmcgrath@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, 12 Aug 2008, Ricky Zhou wrote:
On 2008-08-13 12:29:55 PM, Nigel Jones wrote:
Surely it'd be better suited as 'amber.fedoraproject.org', or something like that, hopefully I'll be back later today/tomorrow to help if needed.
If it requires auth, we'll probably want it at admin.fedoraproject.org so that it can share cookies with our other applications.
it is probably time to better describe what goes where and why. I'm fond of the admin.fedoraproject.org/blah/ for stuff. But if this is an application that end users will be using that doesn't seem quite right.
Yes, it isn't really a fedora 'admin' app. As you said, it's targeted at end users.
-RN
On Tue, 12 Aug 2008, Robin Norwood wrote:
On Tue, 12 Aug 2008 20:09:20 -0500 (CDT) Mike McGrath mmcgrath@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, 12 Aug 2008, Ricky Zhou wrote:
On 2008-08-13 12:29:55 PM, Nigel Jones wrote:
Surely it'd be better suited as 'amber.fedoraproject.org', or something like that, hopefully I'll be back later today/tomorrow to help if needed.
If it requires auth, we'll probably want it at admin.fedoraproject.org so that it can share cookies with our other applications.
it is probably time to better describe what goes where and why. I'm fond of the admin.fedoraproject.org/blah/ for stuff. But if this is an application that end users will be using that doesn't seem quite right.
Yes, it isn't really a fedora 'admin' app. As you said, it's targeted at end users.
Does it have an authed interface for admins or does it pull everything from our repos and such?
-Mike
On Wed, 13 Aug 2008 01:49:47 -0500 (CDT) Mike McGrath mmcgrath@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, 12 Aug 2008, Robin Norwood wrote:
On Tue, 12 Aug 2008 20:09:20 -0500 (CDT) Mike McGrath mmcgrath@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, 12 Aug 2008, Ricky Zhou wrote:
On 2008-08-13 12:29:55 PM, Nigel Jones wrote:
Surely it'd be better suited as 'amber.fedoraproject.org', or something like that, hopefully I'll be back later today/tomorrow to help if needed.
If it requires auth, we'll probably want it at admin.fedoraproject.org so that it can share cookies with our other applications.
it is probably time to better describe what goes where and why. I'm fond of the admin.fedoraproject.org/blah/ for stuff. But if this is an application that end users will be using that doesn't seem quite right.
Yes, it isn't really a fedora 'admin' app. As you said, it's targeted at end users.
Does it have an authed interface for admins or does it pull everything from our repos and such?
It auth against FAS. First, anyone with a FAS account can log in, and post comments and whatnot. Second, if the user happens to own a package that provides a given application, she can edit the app's description, and do things like delete comments and screenshots. Third, if a user is a member of the 'amber_admins' group, he can do the above for all apps, and a few other things.
Does that answer your question?
-RN
On Wed, 13 Aug 2008, Robin Norwood wrote:
On Wed, 13 Aug 2008 01:49:47 -0500 (CDT) Mike McGrath mmcgrath@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, 12 Aug 2008, Robin Norwood wrote:
On Tue, 12 Aug 2008 20:09:20 -0500 (CDT) Mike McGrath mmcgrath@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, 12 Aug 2008, Ricky Zhou wrote:
On 2008-08-13 12:29:55 PM, Nigel Jones wrote:
Surely it'd be better suited as 'amber.fedoraproject.org', or something like that, hopefully I'll be back later today/tomorrow to help if needed.
If it requires auth, we'll probably want it at admin.fedoraproject.org so that it can share cookies with our other applications.
it is probably time to better describe what goes where and why. I'm fond of the admin.fedoraproject.org/blah/ for stuff. But if this is an application that end users will be using that doesn't seem quite right.
Yes, it isn't really a fedora 'admin' app. As you said, it's targeted at end users.
Does it have an authed interface for admins or does it pull everything from our repos and such?
It auth against FAS. First, anyone with a FAS account can log in, and post comments and whatnot. Second, if the user happens to own a package that provides a given application, she can edit the app's description, and do things like delete comments and screenshots. Third, if a user is a member of the 'amber_admins' group, he can do the above for all apps, and a few other things.
Does that answer your question?
Yep, thanks.
-Mike
infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
Mike McGrath -
Nigel Jones -
Ricky Zhou -
Robin Norwood