Last weeks meeting with IRC+SIP went pretty well. Couple of notes:
1) We need to make sure everyone gets setup at the right volume 2) We need a good transcriber for each meeting where IRC and SIP is used 3) We need to find out why some people have been unable to connect 4) A wiki page would help. 5) We never did get recording setup.
So my question for those on the list. We had 14 people at its max listening in. Was this useful to everyone? Was it better then IRC, same as IRC or worse then IRC? If given the opportunity would you like to continue doing meetings via asterisk/callweaver?
-Mike
YES!
For me it went pretty smoothly and was really nice to hear different voices. About the meeting itself, i think it was good, apart from the echo and some volume problems. We can also use 15mins before the meeting just to make sure that everyone is well setup for it :)
On 8/6/07, Mike McGrath mmcgrath@redhat.com wrote:
Last weeks meeting with IRC+SIP went pretty well. Couple of notes:
- We need to make sure everyone gets setup at the right volume
+1
2) We need a good transcriber for each meeting where IRC and SIP is used
do like Toshio was doing, assign a person and write key points to the channel ?!
3) We need to find out why some people have been unable to connect
yes we do...
4) A wiki page would help.
yes it would
5) We never did get recording setup.
This would really be ++1
So my question for those on the list. We had 14 people at its max
listening in. Was this useful to everyone? Was it better then IRC, same as IRC or worse then IRC? If given the opportunity would you like to continue doing meetings via asterisk/callweaver?
-Mike
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
On Mon, 2007-08-06 at 09:13 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
Last weeks meeting with IRC+SIP went pretty well. Couple of notes:
- We need to make sure everyone gets setup at the right volume
- We need a good transcriber for each meeting where IRC and SIP is used
- We need to find out why some people have been unable to connect
- A wiki page would help.
- We never did get recording setup.
So my question for those on the list. We had 14 people at its max listening in. Was this useful to everyone? Was it better then IRC, same as IRC or worse then IRC? If given the opportunity would you like to continue doing meetings via asterisk/callweaver?
I didn't participate, but in general ...
IRC is low resolution, but it includes the most amount of people. Folks can't be on the call, etc. If we're going to have any of our open team meetings on SIP, we have to put the transcribe/interact with IRC as a high priority.
Experience with the F-Board doing phone + IRC didn't go to well for anyone; lots of work for a transcriber, the rest of us don't know what is going on.
- Karsten
On Mon, 2007-08-06 at 08:34 -0700, Karsten Wade wrote:
IRC is low resolution, but it includes the most amount of people. Folks can't be on the call, etc. If we're going to have any of our open team meetings on SIP, we have to put the transcribe/interact with IRC as a high priority.
Experience with the F-Board doing phone + IRC didn't go to well for anyone; lots of work for a transcriber, the rest of us don't know what is going on.
+1. It was really nice to hear people's voices but reading the IRC log shows that it makes it very difficult for anyone not able to participate in the phone session to follow along.
-Toshio
On Mon, 2007-08-06 at 14:17 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Mon, 2007-08-06 at 08:34 -0700, Karsten Wade wrote:
IRC is low resolution, but it includes the most amount of people. Folks can't be on the call, etc. If we're going to have any of our open team meetings on SIP, we have to put the transcribe/interact with IRC as a high priority.
Experience with the F-Board doing phone + IRC didn't go to well for anyone; lots of work for a transcriber, the rest of us don't know what is going on.
+1. It was really nice to hear people's voices but reading the IRC log shows that it makes it very difficult for anyone not able to participate in the phone session to follow along.
Now is when Seth announces yum is going to be able to do voice2text ;-)
# yum listen meeting --exclude no-one
Jonathan
On Mon, 2007-08-06 at 14:17 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
+1. It was really nice to hear people's voices but reading the IRC log shows that it makes it very difficult for anyone not able to participate in the phone session to follow along.
Personally, I'd like to use it for actual socializing, sensitive matters, or presentations/interactive demos/town hall. For example, on occasion we could designate the first 15 minutes of the meeting to chewing the bull over SIP; anyone is welcome to participate, and it is not supposed to go into actual agenda topics (i.e., agree not to talk verbally about agenda items).
Heck, the first few minutes of many conf calls I'm on are people catching up, talking about the {weather,game,market,politics,etc.}. Nice to do that, hear voices, then get off the phone and have the meeting. :)
- Karsten
infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
Jonathan Steffan -
Karsten Wade -
Mike McGrath -
Paulo Santos -
Toshio Kuratomi