Good morning everyone,
I have just released and push to staging a new release of pkgdb2: 1.23.991 (another pre-release of 1.24)
Here is the changelog: * Tue Feb 17 2015 Pierre-Yves Chibon pingou@pingoured.fr - 1.23.991-1 - Update to 1.23.991 (pre-release for 1.24) - Fix documentation to reflect the correct variable name - Add a link to the request made by someone on the user's page (where all the packages of that person are listed) - Simplify the form to request a package to be added to pkgdb - Ensure we check that a group is valid before giving it some ACLs - Make it easier to change one's avatar by simply clicking on it (Ralph Bean) - Add a placeholder for the Review URL field when requesting a package to be added to pkgdb - When giving watch* ACLs to a FAS user, check that this user exists - Per FESCo decision, Fedora branch requests will have by default a 7 days period during which packager with approveacls will be allowed to grant/deny the request, this period does not apply if the requester has approveacls on the package
I have one more change opened for review that will add a `My Requests` tab to the main menu (for logged in users), for the moment requests are accessible via the packager's info page, for example: https://admin.stg.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packager/vondruch/ and https://admin.stg.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packager/vondruch/requests
As usual, testing, RFE, bug or any other feedbacks welcome :)
Thanks, Pierre
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Dne 17.2.2015 v 11:44 Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a):
Good morning everyone,
I have just released and push to staging a new release of pkgdb2: 1.23.991 (another pre-release of 1.24)
Here is the changelog:
- Tue Feb 17 2015 Pierre-Yves Chibon pingou@pingoured.fr - 1.23.991-1
- Update to 1.23.991 (pre-release for 1.24)
- Fix documentation to reflect the correct variable name
- Add a link to the request made by someone on the user's page (where
all the
packages of that person are listed)
- Simplify the form to request a package to be added to pkgdb
- Ensure we check that a group is valid before giving it some ACLs
- Make it easier to change one's avatar by simply clicking on it
(Ralph Bean)
- Add a placeholder for the Review URL field when requesting a package
to be
added to pkgdb
The text fields are too narrow. I can't even see the entire placeholder, what is its content. The summary should accommodate 80 characters.
- When giving watch* ACLs to a FAS user, check that this user exists
- Per FESCo decision, Fedora branch requests will have by default a 7 days period during which packager with approveacls will be allowed to
grant/deny
the request, this period does not apply if the requester has
approveacls on
the package
I have one more change opened for review that will add a `My Requests`
tab to
the main menu (for logged in users), for the moment requests are
accessible via
the packager's info page, for example: https://admin.stg.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packager/vondruch/ and https://admin.stg.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packager/vondruch/requests
Thx, this is good start. You want be surprised if I'd like to modify the request now ;)
BTW how to ask for new branch for example?
Vít
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Dne 17.2.2015 v 12:20 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 17.2.2015 v 11:44 Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a):
Good morning everyone,
I have just released and push to staging a new release of pkgdb2:
1.23.991
(another pre-release of 1.24)
Here is the changelog:
- Tue Feb 17 2015 Pierre-Yves Chibon pingou@pingoured.fr - 1.23.991-1
- Update to 1.23.991 (pre-release for 1.24)
- Fix documentation to reflect the correct variable name
- Add a link to the request made by someone on the user's page (where
all the
packages of that person are listed)
- Simplify the form to request a package to be added to pkgdb
- Ensure we check that a group is valid before giving it some ACLs
- Make it easier to change one's avatar by simply clicking on it
(Ralph Bean)
- Add a placeholder for the Review URL field when requesting a package
to be
added to pkgdb
The text fields are too narrow. I can't even see the entire placeholder, what is its content. The summary should accommodate 80 characters.
- When giving watch* ACLs to a FAS user, check that this user exists
- Per FESCo decision, Fedora branch requests will have by default a
7 days
period during which packager with approveacls will be allowed to
grant/deny
the request, this period does not apply if the requester has
approveacls on
the package
I have one more change opened for review that will add a `My Requests`
tab to
the main menu (for logged in users), for the moment requests are
accessible via
the packager's info page, for example: https://admin.stg.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packager/vondruch/ and https://admin.stg.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packager/vondruch/requests
Thx, this is good start. You want be surprised if I'd like to modify the request now ;)
BTW how to ask for new branch for example?
Ah, "request new branch" in package status ... which gives me strangely floating and strange formated box ....
Vít
Vít
infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 12:20:46PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 17.2.2015 v 11:44 Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a):
I have just released and push to staging a new release of pkgdb2: 1.23.991 (another pre-release of 1.24)
Here is the changelog:
- Tue Feb 17 2015 Pierre-Yves Chibon pingou@pingoured.fr - 1.23.991-1
- Update to 1.23.991 (pre-release for 1.24)
- Fix documentation to reflect the correct variable name
- Add a link to the request made by someone on the user's page (where
all the
packages of that person are listed)
- Simplify the form to request a package to be added to pkgdb
- Ensure we check that a group is valid before giving it some ACLs
- Make it easier to change one's avatar by simply clicking on it
(Ralph Bean)
- Add a placeholder for the Review URL field when requesting a package
to be
added to pkgdb
The text fields are too narrow. I can't even see the entire placeholder, what is its content. The summary should accommodate 80 characters.
My idea was more to give a clue of what is expected there but we can make them larger.
- When giving watch* ACLs to a FAS user, check that this user exists
- Per FESCo decision, Fedora branch requests will have by default a 7 days period during which packager with approveacls will be allowed to
grant/deny
the request, this period does not apply if the requester has
approveacls on
the package
I have one more change opened for review that will add a `My Requests`
tab to
the main menu (for logged in users), for the moment requests are
accessible via
the packager's info page, for example: https://admin.stg.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packager/vondruch/ and https://admin.stg.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packager/vondruch/requests
Thx, this is good start. You want be surprised if I'd like to modify the request now ;)
This is possible on the package's page, for example for you: https://admin.stg.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rubygem-abrt/
But having a link when they are yours is a plus to fix indeed :)
BTW how to ask for new branch for example?
That's also on the package's page, just above the timeline: https://admin.stg.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rubygem-abrt/
Thanks, Pierre
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Dne 17.2.2015 v 11:44 Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a):
- Per FESCo decision, Fedora branch requests will have by default a 7 days period during which packager with approveacls will be allowed to
grant/deny
the request, this period does not apply if the requester has
approveacls on
the package
What is actually the workflow for this?
https://admin.stg.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rubygem-abrt/requests/5
If I ask for a branch and I approve it myself, the branch will be processed immediately? Or will I need to wait for 7 days? Shouldn't I as a owner/POC/administrator of the package be allowed to ask for any branch any time without any additional wait/action?
Actually now I found that I can't approve the action .... That is weird. That cannot be true.
Vít
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 12:28:42PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Dne 17.2.2015 v 11:44 Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a):
- Per FESCo decision, Fedora branch requests will have by default a 7 days period during which packager with approveacls will be allowed to
grant/deny
the request, this period does not apply if the requester has
approveacls on
the package
What is actually the workflow for this?
The workflow is the following: You open the request : status=Pending Someone with approveacls has 7 days to review it: a) he/she agrees with it/doesn't mind/care: status=Awating Review b) he/she disagrees with it: status=Blocked Once set as Awaiting Review (which occurs automatically after 7 days), rel-eng will process the review and Approve it or Deny it.
https://admin.stg.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rubygem-abrt/requests/5
If I ask for a branch and I approve it myself, the branch will be processed immediately? Or will I need to wait for 7 days? Shouldn't I as a owner/POC/administrator of the package be allowed to ask for any branch any time without any additional wait/action?
There will always be a little time until rel-eng process the request but not necessarily the whole 7 days period.
Actually now I found that I can't approve the action .... That is weird. That cannot be true.
The Awaiting Review is kind of the way you can approve the request, I know it's not quite clear so I am still considering changing the statuses to something else, thoughts?
Pierre
Dne 17.2.2015 v 12:46 Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a):
Actually now I found that I can't approve the action .... That is weird. That cannot be true.
The Awaiting Review is kind of the way you can approve the request
I can't set "awaiting review" state anywhere at
https://admin.stg.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rubygem-abrt/requests/5
The only actions available are "pending" or "obsolete" and after click on update, it fails entirely with "The requested URL was not found on the server." error. This is the URL:
https://admin.stg.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package//requests/5
Which is obviously missing the rubygem-abrt part.
Vít
infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org