serverbeach2 (asterisk1, collab1, ns1) and serverbeach3 (asterisk2, collab2) mysteriously rebooted ~30 minutes ago. Could it have been a power problem of some sort? There were no useful entries in /var/log/messages or anything. If we don't find any leads about this tomorrow, could it be something worth asking ServerBeach about?
Thanks, Ricky
On Mon, 2008-08-04 at 02:31 -0400, Ricky Zhou wrote:
serverbeach2 (asterisk1, collab1, ns1) and serverbeach3 (asterisk2, collab2) mysteriously rebooted ~30 minutes ago. Could it have been a power problem of some sort? There were no useful entries in /var/log/messages or anything. If we don't find any leads about this tomorrow, could it be something worth asking ServerBeach about?
yes, it is something worth inquiring about.
also - it looks like something on the systems was not running properly b/c they all had a lot of unsendable mail.
hence all the undelivered mail notices.
-sv
On 2008-08-04 08:17:50 AM, seth vidal wrote:
yes, it is something worth inquiring about.
also - it looks like something on the systems was not running properly b/c they all had a lot of unsendable mail.
hence all the undelivered mail notices.
There was another problem that maybe have been related to undelivered mail - apparently, since January 19th, there has been a FAS account registered with the username "root" (I guess FAS1 didn't block this one). The account name was just changed to something else yesterday :-/
Thanks, Ricky
On Mon, 2008-08-04 at 14:27 -0400, Ricky Zhou wrote:
On 2008-08-04 08:17:50 AM, seth vidal wrote:
yes, it is something worth inquiring about.
also - it looks like something on the systems was not running properly b/c they all had a lot of unsendable mail.
hence all the undelivered mail notices.
There was another problem that maybe have been related to undelivered mail - apparently, since January 19th, there has been a FAS account registered with the username "root" (I guess FAS1 didn't block this one). The account name was just changed to something else yesterday :-/
/me shudders root? seriously? Let's go ahead and validate all the other names we don't like the idea of:
1. pretty much any daemon username in any pkg in fedora 2. all numerics 3. all of the base system usernames
-sv
On 2008-08-04 02:27:19 PM, seth vidal wrote:
/me shudders root? seriously? Let's go ahead and validate all the other names we don't like the idea of:
- pretty much any daemon username in any pkg in fedora
- all numerics
- all of the base system usernames
The current blacklist is in configs/web/applications/fas-prod.cfg.erb, but we'll want to check current names as well.
On the next FAS release, it's being changed from a regex to a comma-separated list of strings. The only other restriction on usernames is that they must be lowercase alphanumeric, and must start with a letter.
Thanks, Ricky
infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
Ricky Zhou -
Seth Vidal