Dear all,
I just pushed to stg a new version a pkgdb: 1.23.99 (pre-release of 1.24).
This version is pretty big as it includes 6 months of work put in the process to request new package or new branch, thus taking theses processes out of bugzilla.
The changelog is rather short though: * Mon Jan 26 2015 Pierre-Yves Chibon pingou@pingoured.fr - 1.23.99-1 - Update to 1.23.99 (pre-release for 1.24) - New processes to request a new package or a new branch of a package directly in pkgdb instead of relying on bugzilla
Please, have a look at it, test it, break it and let us know what is right/wrong with it: https://admin.stg.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/
Thanks, Pierre
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Dne 26.1.2015 v 17:45 Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a):
Dear all,
I just pushed to stg a new version a pkgdb: 1.23.99 (pre-release of 1.24).
This version is pretty big as it includes 6 months of work put in the
process
to request new package or new branch, thus taking theses processes out of bugzilla.
The changelog is rather short though:
- Mon Jan 26 2015 Pierre-Yves Chibon pingou@pingoured.fr - 1.23.99-1
- Update to 1.23.99 (pre-release for 1.24)
- New processes to request a new package or a new branch of a package
directly
in pkgdb instead of relying on bugzilla
Please, have a look at it, test it, break it and let us know what is
right/wrong
https://admin.stg.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/qt5-qtlocation/
Internal Server Error
Vít
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Dne 26.1.2015 v 17:45 Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a):
Dear all,
I just pushed to stg a new version a pkgdb: 1.23.99 (pre-release of 1.24).
This version is pretty big as it includes 6 months of work put in the
process
to request new package or new branch, thus taking theses processes out of bugzilla.
The changelog is rather short though:
- Mon Jan 26 2015 Pierre-Yves Chibon pingou@pingoured.fr - 1.23.99-1
- Update to 1.23.99 (pre-release for 1.24)
- New processes to request a new package or a new branch of a package
directly
in pkgdb instead of relying on bugzilla
Please, have a look at it, test it, break it and let us know what is
right/wrong
And what is the "status" for new review? Don't think this belongs there.
And what should be review URL?
And it finished with Internal server error when I clicked on the "Create" button :/
Vít
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 06:14:36PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Dne 26.1.2015 v 17:45 Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a):
Dear all,
I just pushed to stg a new version a pkgdb: 1.23.99 (pre-release of 1.24).
This version is pretty big as it includes 6 months of work put in the
process
to request new package or new branch, thus taking theses processes out of bugzilla.
The changelog is rather short though:
- Mon Jan 26 2015 Pierre-Yves Chibon pingou@pingoured.fr - 1.23.99-1
- Update to 1.23.99 (pre-release for 1.24)
- New processes to request a new package or a new branch of a package
directly
in pkgdb instead of relying on bugzilla
Please, have a look at it, test it, break it and let us know what is
right/wrong
And what is the "status" for new review? Don't think this belongs there.
And what should be review URL?
The button is meant to be used after the review has been completed in bugzilla. I agree that the title on the button can be confusing. Any idea for a better wording?
And it finished with Internal server error when I clicked on the "Create" button :/
Yeah there was some permission issue at the DB level which I had missed. Should be fixed now.
Thanks for testing, Pierre
Dne 26.1.2015 v 18:54 Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a):
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 06:14:36PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Dne 26.1.2015 v 17:45 Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a):
Dear all,
I just pushed to stg a new version a pkgdb: 1.23.99 (pre-release of 1.24).
This version is pretty big as it includes 6 months of work put in the
process
to request new package or new branch, thus taking theses processes out of bugzilla.
The changelog is rather short though:
- Mon Jan 26 2015 Pierre-Yves Chibon pingou@pingoured.fr - 1.23.99-1
- Update to 1.23.99 (pre-release for 1.24)
- New processes to request a new package or a new branch of a package
directly
in pkgdb instead of relying on bugzilla
Please, have a look at it, test it, break it and let us know what is
right/wrong
And what is the "status" for new review? Don't think this belongs there.
I still don't get the status ...
And what should be review URL?
The button is meant to be used after the review has been completed in bugzilla. I agree that the title on the button can be confusing. Any idea for a better wording?
It is not obvious that the URL is supposed to be the BZ review ticket. It might help.
And it finished with Internal server error when I clicked on the "Create" button :/
Yeah there was some permission issue at the DB level which I had missed. Should be fixed now.
Yes, I was able to request new package .... probably ... since I don't know where it gone. I mean, there is list of "Recent packages added" (which does not sound english to me, but I'm not native speaker after all ;)), but where is the queue of "new package requests"?
Vít
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 08:24:47AM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 26.1.2015 v 18:54 Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a):
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 06:14:36PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Dne 26.1.2015 v 17:45 Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a):
Dear all,
I just pushed to stg a new version a pkgdb: 1.23.99 (pre-release of 1.24).
This version is pretty big as it includes 6 months of work put in the
process
to request new package or new branch, thus taking theses processes out of bugzilla.
The changelog is rather short though:
- Mon Jan 26 2015 Pierre-Yves Chibon pingou@pingoured.fr - 1.23.99-1
- Update to 1.23.99 (pre-release for 1.24)
- New processes to request a new package or a new branch of a package
directly
in pkgdb instead of relying on bugzilla
Please, have a look at it, test it, break it and let us know what is
right/wrong
And what is the "status" for new review? Don't think this belongs there.
I still don't get the status ...
It is the status of the package but you are right, it can probably be skipped when requesting a package and just left to 'Approved' (as anyway the request will not be approved if there is a problem).
And what should be review URL?
The button is meant to be used after the review has been completed in bugzilla. I agree that the title on the button can be confusing. Any idea for a better wording?
It is not obvious that the URL is supposed to be the BZ review ticket. It might help.
I will adjust the UI
And it finished with Internal server error when I clicked on the "Create" button :/
Yeah there was some permission issue at the DB level which I had missed. Should be fixed now.
Yes, I was able to request new package .... probably ... since I don't know where it gone. I mean, there is list of "Recent packages added" (which does not sound english to me, but I'm not native speaker after all ;)), but where is the queue of "new package requests"?
It's part of the admin interface but the API is public: https://admin.stg.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/api/admin/actions So you requested a new package called: rubygem-binding_of_caller :)
Pierre
Dne 27.1.2015 v 08:37 Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a):
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 08:24:47AM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 26.1.2015 v 18:54 Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a):
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 06:14:36PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Dne 26.1.2015 v 17:45 Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a):
Dear all,
I just pushed to stg a new version a pkgdb: 1.23.99 (pre-release of 1.24).
This version is pretty big as it includes 6 months of work put in the
process
to request new package or new branch, thus taking theses processes out of bugzilla.
The changelog is rather short though:
- Mon Jan 26 2015 Pierre-Yves Chibon pingou@pingoured.fr - 1.23.99-1
- Update to 1.23.99 (pre-release for 1.24)
- New processes to request a new package or a new branch of a package
directly
in pkgdb instead of relying on bugzilla
Please, have a look at it, test it, break it and let us know what is
right/wrong
And what is the "status" for new review? Don't think this belongs there.
I still don't get the status ...
It is the status of the package but you are right, it can probably be skipped when requesting a package and just left to 'Approved' (as anyway the request will not be approved if there is a problem).
And what should be review URL?
The button is meant to be used after the review has been completed in bugzilla. I agree that the title on the button can be confusing. Any idea for a better wording?
It is not obvious that the URL is supposed to be the BZ review ticket. It might help.
I will adjust the UI
And it finished with Internal server error when I clicked on the "Create" button :/
Yeah there was some permission issue at the DB level which I had missed. Should be fixed now.
Yes, I was able to request new package .... probably ... since I don't know where it gone. I mean, there is list of "Recent packages added" (which does not sound english to me, but I'm not native speaker after all ;)), but where is the queue of "new package requests"?
It's part of the admin interface but the API is public: https://admin.stg.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/api/admin/actions So you requested a new package called: rubygem-binding_of_caller :)
I'd love to see at least packages I requested in some UI form. Otherwise it might happen that the request will get duplicated, because they were not processed soon enough or I forgot that I already did that, etc.
Vít
infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org