websites June 2019

websites@lists.fedoraproject.org

1 participants
24 discussions

[fedora-websites] Issue #771: Fedoracommunity.org is not fully loaded in Zanata
by Zdenek Chmelar 03 Jun '22

03 Jun '22

zdenek reported a new issue against the project: `fedora-websites` that you are following: `` Topic discussed in translation mailing list - there are strings in Fedoracommunity.org that cannot be loaded in Zanata due to genshi mistakes in the web source code and thanks that can't be translated. Please fix those mistakes to allow the scripts an upload of the strings to Zanata. Thank you Z. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/fedora-websites/issue/771

3 4

[fedora-websites] Issue #821: Recreate a script that only shows languages translated over 25%
by Robert Mayr 03 Jun '22

03 Jun '22

robyduck reported a new issue against the project: `fedora-websites` that you are following: `` We had this functionality on transifex and it was easy to set up. Now on zanata we have much more languages, but most of them son't have more than 5-10% translated strings. We should recreate our script which doesn't show languages if they are not translated for at least 25%. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/fedora-websites/issue/821

4 4

[fedora-websites] Issue #941: alt downloads french: "netinstall" is translated and breaks the design
by Anisse Astier 03 Jun '22

03 Jun '22

anisse reported a new issue against the project: `fedora-websites` that you are following: `` On https://alt.fedoraproject.org/fr/alt/ "netinstall" is translated and its long translation breaks the design of the page. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/fedora-websites/issue/941

5 9

[fedora-websites] Issue #961: Minor content issues with flocktofedora.org
by David Yaffe 03 Jun '22

03 Jun '22

dyaffe reported a new issue against the project: `fedora-websites` that you are following: `` Three are some minor content issue with [https://flocktofedora.org](https://flocktofedora.org). Using page source for line numbers: 1. Under **WHAT WILL WE DO AT FLOCK?** - There is an extra 'm' at the end of the 'Communicate the Fedora Strategy' Bullet (line 82) 2. Under **Download**, 'Get Fedora Atomic' should be updated to 'Get Fedora Silverblue'. The corresponding link also needs to be updated. (line 359) 3. Under **Support**, The link for 'Installation Guide' should be updated for Fedora 30. (Line 375) `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/fedora-websites/issue/961

4 6

[fedora-websites] Issue #942: Overhaul fedora-websites generation and hosting
by Ryan Lerch 04 Nov '21

04 Nov '21

ryanlerch reported a new issue against the project: `fedora-websites` that you are following: `` Currently, we use a bunch of scripts and Make to generate the websites. Furthermore, we use genshi tempates as the basis of the sites. This system is quite old, and has some challenges. From a template / theming point of view, there are many times where templates contain duplicated code, and other issues that make it hard for community members to jump into helping out on the websites. The idea of this ticket is to facilitate discussion on issues of the current process, and progress through to thinking up solutions. Ultimately, hopefully, we can use this ticket as a tracking ticket for tasks as we progress. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/fedora-websites/issue/942

5 5

[fedora-websites] Issue #882: RFE: Beta Landing Page
by Langdon White 03 Nov '21

03 Nov '21

langdon reported a new issue against the project: `fedora-websites` that you are following: `` Would be nice if "Fedora 29 Beta released! Test it in the Download section." linked to something like https://spins.fedoraproject.org/prerelease.html. Or, failing that, had a section on the page about the beta. If you see this sentence and search for "beta" in the page you find nothing. If you search for "download" you only find the download block in the footer which doesn't seem relevant. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/fedora-websites/issue/882

3 3

[fedora-websites] Issue #939: Remove fudcon.fedoraproject.org from the websites repo
by Ryan Lerch 03 Nov '21

03 Nov '21

ryanlerch reported a new issue against the project: `fedora-websites` that you are following: `` fudcon.fedoraproject.org is no longer in use, and just redirects to the flock website. IMHO, we should remove it from the repo, since it is no longer in use. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/fedora-websites/issue/939

3 3

[fedora-websites] Issue #940: Remove fedorahosted.org from the repo
by Ryan Lerch 03 Nov '21

03 Nov '21

ryanlerch reported a new issue against the project: `fedora-websites` that you are following: `` fedorahosted.org is now just a redirect to the wiki page. we should remove it from the repo. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/fedora-websites/issue/940

3 3

[fedora-websites] Issue #945: Keep website Atomic content on F29 instead of moving to F30
by Sinny Kumari 03 Nov '21

03 Nov '21

sinnykumari reported a new issue against the project: `fedora-websites` that you are following: `` In the favor of upcoming Fedora CoreOS, Atomic Host last release is based on Fedora 29 https://lists.projectatomic.io/projectatomic-archives/atomic-announce/2019-… . This ticket is to make sure that we stay on Fedora 29 as major version for future Fedora Atomic Host Two Week releases instead of moving to Fedora 30. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/fedora-websites/issue/945

2 2

[fedora-websites] Issue #889: license for downloads from getfedora.org is underspecified
by Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek 03 Nov '21

03 Nov '21

zbyszek reported a new issue against the project: `fedora-websites` that you are following: `` The licenses for ISOs and other stuff that Fedora Project produces is not specified on the download website. It should be prominently visible. I think there should be a short sentence like > Fedora is always free for anyone to use, modify, and distribute. It is a compilation of software packages, each under its own license. Images that can be downloaded here are available under the combination of licenses of the constituent software packages and the license of the Fedora project itself. See [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legal:Licenses/LicenseAgreement#License]. https://get.adobe.com/flashplayer/ is a good example of how this could be done. It has three panes, and the third one is "terms & conditons" and includes an obvious link to a license. See https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org…. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/fedora-websites/issue/889

3 3

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

websites June 2019