Hi everybody,
Adam Williamson mentioned to me that the Fedora wiki was missing an entry for Aarch64 on the secondary architecture list. I've gone ahead and updated the architecture page:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures#Secondary_Architectures
To point to the standard ARM page. By itself this isn't entirely satisfactory, since the ARM page itself is still largely 32-bit oriented. Do we want to rework this page for greater aarch64 content or do we want to keep this an ARM32 page and add a distinct AArch64 page?
W dniu 18.02.2014 01:15, Brendan Conoboy pisze:
Hi everybody,
Adam Williamson mentioned to me that the Fedora wiki was missing an entry for Aarch64 on the secondary architecture list. I've gone ahead and updated the architecture page:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures#Secondary_Architectures
To point to the standard ARM page. By itself this isn't entirely satisfactory, since the ARM page itself is still largely 32-bit oriented. Do we want to rework this page for greater aarch64 content or do we want to keep this an ARM32 page and add a distinct AArch64 page?
I think that as AArch64 is incompatible with ARM we should make separate page. It is not just rebuild with different flags (like Pidora) but totally different beast.
On 18 Feb 2014 00:15, "Brendan Conoboy" blc@redhat.com wrote:
Hi everybody,
Adam Williamson mentioned to me that the Fedora wiki was missing an entry
for Aarch64 on the secondary architecture list. I've gone ahead and updated the architecture page:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures#Secondary_Architectures
To point to the standard ARM page. By itself this isn't entirely
satisfactory, since the ARM page itself is still largely 32-bit oriented. Do we want to rework this page for greater aarch64 content or do we want to keep this an ARM32 page and add a distinct AArch64 page?
Definitely a separate page. We're not intending on doing and form of multilib between the two so for all intents and purpose its a new architecture and I'd like to keep it like that to minimise confusion.