Fedora Arm,
I am emailing to see if there will be support for the Pinebook Pro or an emmc install script for installing fedora arm on the Pinebook Pro?
v/r,
Christopher Smith
Hi Christopher,
Christopher Smith csmith47891@yahoo.com writes:
Fedora Arm,
I am emailing to see if there will be support for the Pinebook Pro or an emmc install script for installing fedora arm on the Pinebook Pro?
I have asked the same a month ago ;-)
It's on the agenda: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/arm@lists.fedoraproject.org/th...
Cheers,
Dan
Hi Christopher,
Christopher Smith csmith47891@yahoo.com writes:
Fedora Arm,
I am emailing to see if there will be support for the Pinebook Pro or an emmc install script for installing fedora arm on the Pinebook Pro?
I have asked the same a month ago ;-)
It's on the agenda: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/arm@lists.fedoraproject.org/th...
I'm working on it. The plan is for initial support in Fedora 32. I'm working on getting U-Boot in decent shape so it can be flashed to the SPI, plus a usable DT. Most of the userspace stuff is already there. We will then evolve it through the release. Hoping to have it in a semi reasonable state by the end of the month.
Hi Peter,
Peter Robinson pbrobinson@gmail.com writes:
I'm working on it. The plan is for initial support in Fedora 32. I'm working on getting U-Boot in decent shape so it can be flashed to the SPI, plus a usable DT. Most of the userspace stuff is already there. We will then evolve it through the release. Hoping to have it in a semi reasonable state by the end of the month.
JFYI: Someone already created a Fedora image and linked it into the pinebook wiki: https://wiki.pine64.org/index.php/Pinebook_Pro_Software_Release#Fedora But it's definitely not official, as the download links to SourceForge.
Cheers,
Dan
I'm working on it. The plan is for initial support in Fedora 32. I'm working on getting U-Boot in decent shape so it can be flashed to the SPI, plus a usable DT. Most of the userspace stuff is already there. We will then evolve it through the release. Hoping to have it in a semi reasonable state by the end of the month.
JFYI: Someone already created a Fedora image and linked it into the pinebook wiki: https://wiki.pine64.org/index.php/Pinebook_Pro_Software_Release#Fedora But it's definitely not official, as the download links to SourceForge.
Correct, I've been in communication with them, it's a hacked up kernel from elsewhere.
On Sun, Feb 16, 2020 at 6:33 AM Peter Robinson pbrobinson@gmail.com wrote:
I'm working on it. The plan is for initial support in Fedora 32. I'm working on getting U-Boot in decent shape so it can be flashed to the SPI, plus a usable DT. Most of the userspace stuff is already there. We will then evolve it through the release. Hoping to have it in a semi reasonable state by the end of the month.
JFYI: Someone already created a Fedora image and linked it into the pinebook wiki: https://wiki.pine64.org/index.php/Pinebook_Pro_Software_Release#Fedora But it's definitely not official, as the download links to SourceForge.
Correct, I've been in communication with them, it's a hacked up kernel from elsewhere.
If you can't establish provenance of the image and the user who posted it, then you should report it to the Fedora Security team and Pine Security team so they take it down.
There's no reason to have Fedora users downloading random/tainted/corrupt/malware images that appear to be official. It is a malware author's wet dream come true.
Jeff
I'm working on it. The plan is for initial support in Fedora 32. I'm working on getting U-Boot in decent shape so it can be flashed to the SPI, plus a usable DT. Most of the userspace stuff is already there. We will then evolve it through the release. Hoping to have it in a semi reasonable state by the end of the month.
JFYI: Someone already created a Fedora image and linked it into the pinebook wiki: https://wiki.pine64.org/index.php/Pinebook_Pro_Software_Release#Fedora But it's definitely not official, as the download links to SourceForge.
Correct, I've been in communication with them, it's a hacked up kernel from elsewhere.
If you can't establish provenance of the image and the user who posted it, then you should report it to the Fedora Security team and Pine Security team so they take it down.
The providence is fine, there's source code etc available.
There's no reason to have Fedora users downloading random/tainted/corrupt/malware images that appear to be official. It is a malware author's wet dream come true.
It will be removed once I have a real update.
-
Christopher Smith -
Dan Čermák -
Jeffrey Walton -
Peter Robinson