Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting: Fedora ARM & AArch64 status meeting on 2015-03-03 from 15:00:00 to 16:00:00 UTC At fedora-meeting-2@irc.freenode.net
The meeting will be about: Fedora ARM & AArch64 weekly status meeting.
More information available at: [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/ARM%5D(https://fedoraproject.or...)
Source: https://apps.fedoraproject.org//calendar//meeting/1936/
On 03/01/2015 10:00 AM, pwhalen@redhat.com wrote:
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting: Fedora ARM & AArch64 status meeting on 2015-03-03 from 15:00:00 to 16:00:00 UTC At fedora-meeting-2@irc.freenode.net
The meeting will be about: Fedora ARM & AArch64 weekly status meeting.
More information available at: [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/ARM%5D(https://fedoraproject.or...)
I went there and then looked at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/ARM/Planning/Primary
I know everyone is busy, on things that I would like to see done. But I think it does all of your hard work a disservice that this is so dated.
Maybe even just a disclaimer at the top that it reflects the thinking back during F17, and now we have moved well beyond it with F21/22.
Source: https://apps.fedoraproject.org//calendar//meeting/1936/
You are kindly invited to the meeting: Fedora ARM & AArch64 status meeting on 2015-03-03 from 15:00:00 to 16:00:00 UTC At fedora-meeting-2@irc.freenode.net
The meeting will be about: Fedora ARM & AArch64 weekly status meeting.
More information available at:
[https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/ARM%5D(https://fedoraproject.or...)
I went there and then looked at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/ARM/Planning/Primary
I know everyone is busy, on things that I would like to see done. But I think it does all of your hard work a disservice that this is so dated.
Maybe even just a disclaimer at the top that it reflects the thinking back during F17, and now we have moved well beyond it with F21/22.
Robert, it's dated because ARMv7 has been primary since F-20 and hence the document is ancient history and there for historical purposes only. aarch64 is secondary but unrelated to the link above.
On 03/02/2015 09:50 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
You are kindly invited to the meeting: Fedora ARM & AArch64 status meeting on 2015-03-03 from 15:00:00 to 16:00:00 UTC At fedora-meeting-2@irc.freenode.net
The meeting will be about: Fedora ARM & AArch64 weekly status meeting.
More information available at:
[https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/ARM%5D(https://fedoraproject.or...)
I went there and then looked at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/ARM/Planning/Primary
I know everyone is busy, on things that I would like to see done. But I think it does all of your hard work a disservice that this is so dated.
Maybe even just a disclaimer at the top that it reflects the thinking back during F17, and now we have moved well beyond it with F21/22.
Robert, it's dated because ARMv7 has been primary since F-20 and hence the document is ancient history and there for historical purposes only. aarch64 is secondary but unrelated to the link above.
I understand it is ancient history, but it is linked in as if it were current. I got there from:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/ARM
Under the 'Planning' topic.
So you know it is ancient history. I know it is ancient history. Someone new will be thrown off by it.
But that is my take, and I know how documenting takes second place to getting things working.
On 2 March 2015 at 08:04, Robert Moskowitz rgm@htt-consult.com wrote:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/ARM
Under the 'Planning' topic.
So you know it is ancient history. I know it is ancient history. Someone new will be thrown off by it.
But that is my take, and I know how documenting takes second place to getting things working.
It is a wiki. If you notice a problem, you have the power to fix it. If people don't like the fix, they can undo it.
arm mailing list arm@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
----- Original Message -----
On 2 March 2015 at 08:04, Robert Moskowitz < rgm@htt-consult.com > wrote:
https://fedoraproject.org/ wiki/Architectures/ARM
Under the 'Planning' topic.
So you know it is ancient history. I know it is ancient history. Someone new will be thrown off by it.
But that is my take, and I know how documenting takes second place to getting things working.
It is a wiki. If you notice a problem, you have the power to fix it. If people don't like the fix, they can undo it.
Yes, please feel free to edit where needed! I've added a note at the top for now.
Paul
On 03/02/2015 10:46 AM, Paul Whalen wrote:
----- Original Message -----
On 2 March 2015 at 08:04, Robert Moskowitz < rgm@htt-consult.com > wrote:
https://fedoraproject.org/ wiki/Architectures/ARM
Under the 'Planning' topic.
So you know it is ancient history. I know it is ancient history. Someone new will be thrown off by it.
But that is my take, and I know how documenting takes second place to getting things working.
It is a wiki. If you notice a problem, you have the power to fix it. If people don't like the fix, they can undo it.
Yes, please feel free to edit where needed! I've added a note at the top for now.
I am reading what it takes to be able to edit this wiki. Something about FAS account. I am assuming I do not have one. I do have a bugs account, but I read that is not an FAS account. So perhaps sometime today, or so, I will get this done.
I *Did* tell Peter that I would at least document what is working for me with my Cubie boards. Somewhere on the wiki...
-
Paul Whalen -
Peter Robinson -
Robert Moskowitz -
Stephen John Smoogen