---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Damien Durand splinux@fedoraproject.org Date: 27 août 2006 12:18 Subject: Re: [Fedora-infrastructure-list] A cvs space for the Usability Sig To: "Patrick W. Barnes" nman64@n-man.com
Hi,
"temporary storage" aren't the good words, I'm actually starting an application for "Fedora Usability" called "fusability". It's like bug-buddy but allow to produce usability repports. Yes actually I can host this on a my web access because it's not usable.
Bugzilla allow to conserve patchs or other? I don't think that it's the best solution but now that can be acceptable because the Usability Sigs has an existance of 2 weeks.
The "Usability packages" is a good idea, We can produce "unofficial" packages for testing the application massively...
I'm agree with you, cvs is not essential actually because usability is too young but that can be good for a efficient and productive work. Send the sources by mail etc... is not really great.
2006/8/27, Patrick W. Barnes nman64@n-man.com:
On Saturday 26 August 2006 12:11, "Damien Durand" < splinux@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
I would like to ask for a cvs space for the Usability Sig so as to host temporarily some documentations, codes and patches, allowing a more efficient and productive work.
CVS isn't for temporary storage. You need to work with other projects to keep things where they belong. Documentation should be kept in packages, with the Documentation Project, or on the wiki. Patches should be provided through Bugzilla to appropriate maintainers or directly to upstream. Efficiency is achieved through collaboration and management, not version control.
Unless the Usability SIG starts producing stand-alone packages, and I don't see any reason that it ever should, I can't imagine why it would have any real need for its own CVS repository.
-- Patrick "The N-Man" Barnes nman64@n-man.com
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/nman64
Have I been helpful? Rate my assistance! http://rate.affero.net/nman64/ --