On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 11:30:02AM -0500, Matt_Domsch@Dell.com wrote:
+1
Assuming you don't just want to do a permanent redirect on that pattern instead...
I thought about it but there are drawbacks:
* The URL could be used again... it would just have a different meaning (associated with built packages instead of srpms/source control) * Because of the former, people need to fix the code they have that references it before the meaning is changed. They'll likely ignore a 301 but a 500 forces them to make changes. * Redirects are simple changes but this is even simpler.
I may still decide a redirect is appropriate but probably not until after the beta change freeze.
Thanks! -Toshio