On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Mike McGrathmmcgrath@redhat.com wrote:
I'm not sure if we have any memcached experience on the list but I thought I'd ask. Can anyone explain this:
Notice how memcached1 has a much higher hit rate and memcached2 has a much lower hit rate?
The time for memcached1 is 5x less than memcached2 being up. That can have an effect on caching as right after a system comes up its rates are usually much higher and then over time fall off (iirc). I think it would take bringing both up at the same time to figure out if there is a true disparity over caching.
-Mike
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list