Mike McGrath wrote:
Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 12:02:20 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 22:47:20 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 22:08:12 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
$ rpm -q python-kid python-kid-0.9-2.centos4
on buildsys.fedoraproject.org would benefit from an update to 0.9.5 which includes xml related fixes and makes it possible to create pages that don't fail in the w3c validator.
$ rpm -q --whatrequires python-kid repoview-0.5.1-1.centos4
http://home.arcor.de/ms2002sep/tmp/el4-extras/noarch/python-kid-0.9.5-0.1.el...
Source rpms and build requirements here: http://home.arcor.de/ms2002sep/tmp/el4-extras/
I'm not sure I fully understand what problem this solves. Can you give me an example?
Sure. It's
versus
The former was created with unmodified software on buildsys.f.o, while the latter was created with my modified repoview including an updated python-kid.
So, what is the formal procedure for requesting a package update on the buildsys server like described above and getting an official and final reply?
Get someone upstream (RHEL) to accept the package changes. buildsys is going away in days anyway after koji goes live.
It's bad form to ignore one person and ask the same of others. We've said no. You didn't convince us. Sorry. You showed me that its creating mal-formed XML. It always has, no one has brought it up. I even gave you list of steps to do to get it updated. Exactly what issues is this causing you in your use of the buildsys?
-Mike