music February 2010

music@lists.fedoraproject.org

3 participants
2 discussions

Re: [Fedora-music-list] music Digest, Vol 39, Issue 1
by Anuj More 12 Feb '10

12 Feb '10

I would have, if i knew what a package maintainer does. I am new to this project and not sure how it works. However, I am a long time Audacity user. Glad to have you sailing the ship for a while, Captn. Respect. > After sending this message, I will step back as "audacity" co-packager. > but I'd like to encourage everyone with interest in Audacity to contribute > a tiny bit and to consider signing up as Fedora packager or bugzapper.

2 1

Audacity
by Michael Schwendt 10 Feb '10

10 Feb '10

Hello everyone, especially those with interest in Audacity! After sending this message, I will step back as "audacity" co-packager. Recently I haven't found the motivation to stay up-to-date on Audacity development and wxWidgets/GTK peculiarities. Partly because my usage of Audacity has decreased - for several months I've used it only sporadically. Partly because it's hard to keep track of known and unfixed race conditions, problems with Port Audio and Pulse Audio, unreproducible crash bugs, and neglecting the audacity-devel list only makes it worse. Also because it's frustrating if bug reporters don't give any feedback on test updates in several weeks, and no other Fedora users give feedback on test updates either. There still is the original package owner and a co-maintainer, but I'd like to encourage everyone with interest in Audacity to contribute a tiny bit and to consider signing up as Fedora packager or bugzapper. This applies to Fedora packages in general. There are still too many Fedora packages, which only have a single owner. I had hoped that Audacity would be interesting enough for multiple people to build a team of package maintainers - but apparently it isn't.

1 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

music February 2010