music September 2015

music@lists.fedoraproject.org

5 participants
6 discussions

fedora jam resubmit?
by Ian Malone 14 Sep '15

14 Sep '15

Further to the dumping of fedora jam from nightlies and test builds it looks like we wont be in F23 (despite being on https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/23/Spins) and will have to re-submit the spin for approval for F24 (not clear how to do that as many of the things in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Spins_Process are already done). Is it worth doing? I don't mind doing testing on composes and images, but don't want to just go ahead and re-submit the spin without asking here first. -- imalone http://ibmalone.blogspot.co.uk

3 5

Denemo
by Martin Tarenskeen 10 Sep '15

10 Sep '15

Has anyone tried to install Denemo + LilyPond from the Fedora 22 repos? I am not getting any noteheads in the editorscreen, and I see some error messages in my terminal about some fonts not being found (when I start denemo from a terminal command). -- MT

1 1

Fedora Jam not in nightly composes / F23 alpha or beta?
by Ian Malone 07 Sep '15

07 Sep '15

Hi, It seems Fedora Jam is not included in current test composes for F23 and is not being included in nightly composes http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/tasks?state=all&view=tree&method=livecd&… (not failing to build as Live Workstation is, simply not being included in attempted builds). I can't find any reference in spins@, test@ or devel@ to this, except in the lead-up to F22 release that there was an issue which was fixed (and didn't prevent Jam being included in the release), <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197940>. Has it been intentionally dropped or has there just been some oversight? -- imalone http://ibmalone.blogspot.co.uk

1 1

New Release Approaches
by Brian Monroe 04 Sep '15

04 Sep '15

I was looking through our kick start file for adding ffado, and came across a few things: Patchage is listed there but is commented out. I didn't see it currently in the repos. Is someone working on getting it packaged? Is there an interest in having it in the spin? Second, Fedora 23 is quickly approaching. I think it's time for a background change, Anyone else have ideas, comments, suggestions, or submissions? Is there anything else that needs to get done before the next release?

2 1

jack2: issues w. 32bit clients in 64bit jackd since Fedora 22
by anders.vinjar＠bek.no 03 Sep '15

03 Sep '15

Hi all. After upgrading to fc22 during summer, I'm having issues with 32bit jack clients running in my 64bit jackd. I'd be thankful for any clues to what's going on, and ways to debug this. And if others would care to check, and confirm/disprove the same behavior, please tell me what you get. Here's what happens: The 32bit clients connect well, but the callbacks never seem to return, making jackd send out a steady stream of xruns and errors: JackEngine::XRun: client = simple_client was not finished, state = Triggered I'm checking with jack2 installed (jack-1.9.10), with .i686 and .x86_64 versions installed using the standard fedora packages. The same 32bit clients work well in fc21, fc20, and ubuntu 14.04 (in a vm on the same hardware). Afaik, nothing has changed vs. the -mixed flag in jackd, and would expect 32bit clients to run well inside a 64bit jackd. Checking with example-clients/simple-client.c from the jack sources: $ gcc -m32 -g -O -lm -ljack simple_client.c -o simple_client $ ./simple_client - results in the noted behavior. Without -m32 everything's fine. Thanks, -anders

1 0

Re: [Fedora-music-list] Missing Package?
by Jeff Sandys 01 Sep '15

01 Sep '15

This thread in Linux Audio User seems to indicate that the firewire interface is now part of ALSA in the 4.x kernels: http://lists.linuxaudio.org/pipermail/linux-audio-user/2015-August/102281.h… -- Jeff I'm not sure if it got taken out, or we just missed it, but ffado (already > in the repos) isn't in the list of packages for the audio group install, > nor was it installed on my system after fedup from the 21 Jam spin. (I > think that's what I did, and not a clean install) but FFADO wasn' t > installed already. > > Not sure if this is the best place for this, or if I should file a bug > report. Let me know if the latter is better. =) >

3 4

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

music September 2015