Am 23.06.19 um 22:14 schrieb Peter Robinson:
Am 23.06.19 um 21:22 schrieb Jan Kratochvil:
On Sun, 23 Jun 2019 12:32:14 +0200, Peter Robinson wrote:
There's a few Fedora patches but nothing specific to mmc or the RPi mmc/sdhci modules.
kernel-5.0. 0-300.fc30.aarch64 PASS kernel-5.0. 0-300.vanilla.fc30.aarch64 PASS https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=35752827 kernel-5.0.17-300.vanilla.fc30.aarch64 PASS https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=35752457 kernel-5.0.17-300.fc30.aarch64 FAIL
So it looks as a Fedora-specific regression somewhere in the 5.0.x series.
Please wait, i see that fc30 still uses this experimental cpufreq patch, which is very dangerous.
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/kernel/blob/f30/f/bcm2835-cpufreq-add-CPU...
Please try to remove this patch at first
That hasn't changed in some kernels, we've had that there for some time, in F-29 too
But it is still dangerous and has negative side effects on sdhost interface. At least we should test if this has influence on the issue.
I can continue bisecting but a hint is welcome to reduce the number of steps.
Maybe Stefan Wahren is not interested if it is a Fedora specific regression?
(Then sure my testing may have fuzzy results etc. but I haven't noticed anything like that yet.)
Jan
The vanilla kernels I have built with: https://people.redhat.com/jkratoch/aarch64-vanilla.patch As the official --with vanilla kernel.spec flag is buggy now: Error: rpmbuild -bs --with vanilla kernel.spec https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1547553 _______________________________________________ arm mailing list -- arm@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to arm-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/arm@lists.fedoraproject.org