On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 4:07 AM, Donald T Gullett < webwillow@thewebwillow.com> wrote:
Niels de Vos <devos@...> writes:
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 11:37 PM, Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@...> wrote:
The glibc issue is interesting... it seems its a regression from F-13, we had to apply a patch for F-13 but even with all that in place I still get some failures. So it seems to be a regression (and we're seeing it on the F-15 glibc one as well. I'll do some more testing and follow up with the logs etc so that someone more smart than I am might be able to comment and assist
All help and feedback welcome :-D
I've managed to build the F14 glibc on F13:
All the core OS has been done. We're now looking at the rest of the OS. IE desktops (gnome/kde/xfce), dev environments (haskell/mono/java etc).
If someone finds some time to test, please leave a note in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708452 or on this list. If there are any issues, I'll try to have a look at them.
Cheers, Niels
I have noticed that forward movement for F14 and or F15 for the armv5tel hasnt had much attention and that the focus is moving torward the newer boards. I would like greatly to be able to provide some help in this area and if some one contacted me, I would love to ask many questions and provide hours of compile and research time to provide a footfs for F14 and or F15 :)
What Constitutes a F14-F15 build over F12? What Packages denotes a fedora build? What Design Denotes a fedora build?
Exactly the same as an upstream mainline F-14 release. At the moment we're concentrating on the gold release which packages tagged with dist-f14 as opposed to updates.
I have a few sheevaplugs and I am currently running F12 with kernel 2.6.39.1
Have you not tried the F-13 betas on any of them yet?
Peter