env-and-stacks April 2014

env-and-stacks@lists.fedoraproject.org

17 participants
16 discussions

Agenda for Env-and-Stacks WG meeting (2014-04-29)
by Marcela Mašláňová 29 Apr '14

29 Apr '14

WG meeting will be at 12:00 UTC. == Topic == * Copr and Playground plugin part of dnf-plugins-core Votes on mailing list were fifty fifty, so we should probably decided what's the best approach. * Allow to delete builds/coprs from playground? * feature request - dnf plugin should be able to block view of some copr repositories in Playground?

1 1

Fwd: Copr and Playground plugin part of dnf-plugins-core?
by Miroslav Suchý 28 Apr '14

28 Apr '14

Dear working group, since various devels have various opinions. I would like to ask you to discuss this on your next meeting. For reasoning and pros and cons see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1090516 Please put your conclusion in this BZ. Mirek Suchy -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Copr and Playground plugin part of dnf-plugins-core? Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 11:29:15 +0200 From: Miroslav Suchý <msuchy(a)redhat.com> Reply-To: Development discussions related to Fedora <devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org> Organization: Red Hat, Registered Address: Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkynova 99/71, 612 45 Brno, Czech Republic, Registered in Brno under identification number CZ27690016 To: Development discussions related to Fedora <devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org> In https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1090516 Jiri asked for removing Copr (and Playground) DNF plugin out of dnf-plugins-core. Since this is not technical but merely political question I would like to ask wider audience: Put your voice here please: http://www.easypolls.net/poll.html?p=5358d77de4b06a67c5b08e05 If there will be significant votes for one option, I would do what most of you wish. Otherwise I will forward it to Fesco for decision. -- Miroslav Suchy, RHCE, RHCDS Red Hat, Senior Software Engineer, #brno, #devexp, #fedora-buildsys -- devel mailing list devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

1 0

Playground DNF plugin
by Miroslav Suchý 24 Apr '14

24 Apr '14

Hi, I created first prototype of Playground repo (you know - release early...). The playground repo is just set of Copr repositories. I.e. some Copr projects can have attribute "playground" set to true (currently no interface, only directly in DB). I choosed randomly several projects and set the flag to true. There is an API call to get list of those projects: http://copr.fedoraproject.org/api/playground/list/ (currently undocumented, because I plan to make some changes). I wrote DNF plugin (based on Copr DNF plugin). You can test it by: curl https://raw.githubusercontent.com/akozumpl/dnf-plugins-core/master/plugins/… > /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/dnf-plugins/copr.py and you can do: dnf playground enable which will enable all Copr project, which are marked as part of Playground and store them in /etc/yum.repos.d/_playground_<owner>_<projectname>.repo and: dnf playground upgrade which will fetch new repos (by removing all old repos and fetch all playground repos). and: dnf playground disable which will delete all /etc/yum.repos.d/_playground_*.repo As I said, this is first prototype (although functional) and it have some glitches. But you can get the idea. Is this the path we want to follow? Questions? Comments? Mirek Suchy

7 12

Deliverables and release engineering changes for Fedora.Next
by Jaroslav Reznik 23 Apr '14

23 Apr '14

Hi! As it seems, Fedora.Next and product planning leads also to changes how Fedora is produced and how it's going to be distributed to our users. For this, we need to collect product deliverables, so needed changes for release engineering can be planned (and implemented) and as I was talking to Dennis, we're are currently blocked on it. I created rel-eng ticket - WGs, please, try to sum up required changes there (in consumable way), so we have it in one place (for possible overlaps in requirements etc). https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5891 Currently, Alpha Change Deadline is planned for no earlier than 2014-07-22, it's not as far as it sounds, especially if changes in releng are needed. So let's try to work this out as soon as possible. I suppose, in the end, FESCo should approve requested changes in product deliverables. So once requirements are collected, I'll create (yet another) ticket for FESCo. Or even better - as Cloud did - Change proposal would be the best solution, even after the submission deadline. (Sorry for cross-posting;-). Thanks Jaroslav

1 0

Agenda for Env-and-Stacks WG meeting (2014-04-22)
by Marcela Mašláňová 22 Apr '14

22 Apr '14

WG meeting will be at 16:00 UTC, 17:00 Central Europe, 12:00 (noon) Boston, 9:00 San Francisco, 1:00 Tokyo in #fedora-meeting on Freenode. == Topic == Comments to topics from lists: * Allow to delete builds/coprs from playground? https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/env-and-stacks/2014-April/000381.… * Playground dnf plugin - prototype and signing of packages https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/env-and-stacks/2014-April/000376.… * open floor See you, Marcela

1 1

Agenda for Env-and-Stacks WG meeting (2014-04-15)
by Marcela Mašláňová 16 Apr '14

16 Apr '14

WG meeting will be at 12:00 UTC, 14:00 Central Europe, 8:00 Boston, 5:00 San Francisco, 21:00 Tokyo in #fedora-meeting on Freenode. == Topic == * really finish Open Questions https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Env_and_Stacks/Playground_repository_%28draf… * plan tasks to split among developers Marcela

5 8

Question for enabling playground repository
by Miroslav Suchý 09 Apr '14

09 Apr '14

I am creating prototype of playground repository and have one question. When user will be going to enable Playground repository, he should get some question with some warning. When enabling Copr repository you will get: >You are going to enable Copr repository. Please note that this repository is not >part of Fedora distribution and may have various quality. Fedora distribution >have no power over this repository and can not enforce some quality or security >level. >Please do not file bug reports about this packages in Fedora Bugzilla. >In case of problems you should contact owner of this repository. > >Do you want to continue? [y/N]: Can somebody with better literacy proficiency than me suggest some similar paragraph for enabling Playground repository? Thanks in advance -- Miroslav Suchy, RHCE, RHCDS Red Hat, Senior Software Engineer, #brno, #devexp, #fedora-buildsys

3 3

Agenda for Env-and-Stacks WG meeting (2014-04-08)
by Marcela Mašláňová 08 Apr '14

08 Apr '14

WG meeting will be at 16:00 UTC, 17:00 Central Europe, 12:00 (noon) Boston, 9:00 San Francisco, 1:00 Tokyo in #fedora-meeting on Freenode. == Topic == I sent three Change proposals. If you have any comments, please share them. * https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SCL * https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Playground_repository * https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Ruby193_in_SCL * continue in Open Questions about Playground * https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Env_and_Stacks/Playground_repository_%28draf… * see dnf plugin http://mmaslano.livejournal.com/10322.html See you, Marcela

1 1

Open Questions - Playground: Signing
by Marcela Mašláňová 07 Apr '14

07 Apr '14

Proposal: I propose using obs-signd for Copr packages hosted in Playground repo. The obs-signd won't be much work. I'd like to volunteer Josef, who is working on his thesis OBS in Fedora, to work on it sooner than on other packages. Let's use the same system, which we used for approval of Playground repo: mirroring. No disapproval on mailing list means approval on next meeting. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Env_and_Stacks/Playground_repository_%28draf…

3 2

Change proposal: SCL
by Marcela Mašláňová 03 Apr '14

03 Apr '14

I prepared first draft of Change proposal for SCL. What do you think? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Env_and_Stacks/Changes_Drafts/SCL Marcela

2 2

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

env-and-stacks April 2014