env-and-stacks February 2015

env-and-stacks@lists.fedoraproject.org

7 participants
11 discussions

Start a nNew thread

Agenda for Env-and-Stacks WG meeting (2015-02-26)
by Honza Horak 28 Feb '15

28 Feb '15

3 5

Re: Recommended practices for creating docker files
by Petr Hracek 20 Feb '15

20 Feb '15

Hi Marek, thanks for the updates. I am going to briefly check you guidelines if they can be used for writing a wiki about dockerfiles and other stuff. Greetings. Petr On 02/20/2015 10:34 AM, Marek Goldmann wrote: > Hi Petr, > > Please note that the mentioned document will be removed. We're currently restructurizing the guidelines, since most of this is also covered in OpenShift guidelines available here: http://docs.openshift.org/latest/image_writers_guide/guidelines.html. I'm unsure if a wiki page that duplicates this is a good idea (since this will be another place to keep up to date). Instead a wiki page that links to relevant resources and adds there what's missing is a better idea I think. > > I'm CC'ing Jonathan, who's currently working on merging the guidelines. > > --Marek > > ----- Original Message ----- >> Hi Marek, >> >> I have read your >> http://file.rdu.redhat.com/~mgoldman/jboss-docker-docs/best-practice.html >> and I would like to create (or with you) a wiki page where could be >> described steps how to create a docker files. >> >> Also some docker_lint program would be fine for users, but I know only: >> https://github.com/tubesandlube/dockerlint >> https://github.com/redhataccess/dockerfile_lint >> >> My question is if you already have a some notes for this issue. >> >> Could you please help us with creating a wiki page? >> >> Greetings >> Petr >> >> -- Petr Hracek Software Engineer Developer Experience Red Hat, Inc Mob: +420777056169 email: phracek(a)redhat.com

1 0

Agenda for Env-and-Stacks WG meeting (2015-02-19)
by Honza Horak 20 Feb '15

20 Feb '15

HEADS UP -- new time and place; since we would have a collision in #fedora-meeting and it seems to be better to have meetings on the same channel every week, let's meet at #fedora-meeting-1. WG meeting will be at 18:00 UTC (13:00 EST, 19:00 Brno, 13:00 Boston, 3:00+1d Tokyo, 4:00+1d Brisbane) in #fedora-meeting-1 on Freenode. = Topics = * Follow-ups -- any changes from last week? * Dockerfiles recommended tips [1] * Some info about beaker @ fedoraproject and potential Env&Stack use cases * Open Floor [1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Hhorak/Draft/task-dockerfile-rules [2] http://beaker.fedoraproject.org/

3 5

Governance charter revisiting -- no changes needed?
by Honza Horak 19 Feb '15

19 Feb '15

The Changing These Rules chapter in [1] says the Governance charter will be re-evaluated after Fedora 21 is released. So far I got no input what should be changed, so if nobody proposes anything else, I'll just move the "Changing These Rules" section to 22. Based on lazy consensus habit, I'm giving one week timeout to stop me, starting now :) [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Env_and_Stacks/Governance_Charter Honza

1 0

Meeting minutes for Env-and-Stacks WG meeting (2015-02-12)
by Colin Walters 12 Feb '15

12 Feb '15

============================================== #fedora-meeting-2: Env and Stacks (2015-02-12) ============================================== Meeting started by hhorak at 13:08:40 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-2/2015-02-12/env-and-stacks… . Meeting summary --------------- * Env&Stacks Governance Charter Review as per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Env_and_Stacks/Governance_Charter#Changing_T… (hhorak, 13:10:10) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Env_and_Stacks/Governance_Charter#Changing_T… (hhorak, 13:10:15) * AGREED: (phracek, 13:12:15) * ACTION: all to read Governance charter and if there are any issues that should be revisited, let's bring them on ML or add them to agenda for some of the next weeks (hhorak, 13:12:29) * Follow-ups -- what has changed since last meeting (hhorak, 13:12:55) * update about devpi - upstream wanted us to create a formal proposal for the feature we need. I passed the work on to Matej Stuchlik and we now have the proposal for upstream https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/devpi-dev/py-B9kwaK5Y and are waiting for comments (hhorak, 13:13:32) * the devpi feature seems to be the only blocker. once it's done, we can go on and deploy devpi testing instance (hhorak, 13:16:17) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Env_and_Stacks/Projects/LanguageSpecificRepo… (hhorak, 13:16:25) * LINK: http://pulp-python.readthedocs.org/en/latest/ (ncoghlan, 13:16:47) * the plan is the package would get into fedora, then its upstream would be mirrored, at least for the time being (hhorak, 13:22:38) * longer term, the upstream packaging may be mirrored first and a potentially non-policy compliant RPM got into COPR (hhorak, 13:22:38) * PEP 426 should allow autopackage stuff from devpi instance to rpm (hhorak, 13:26:16) * LINK: https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0426/ (hhorak, 13:26:16) * LINK: https://github.com/pypa/interoperability-peps if you spot any major issues (ncoghlan, 13:31:31) * LINK: https://people.gnome.org/~walters/docs/build-api.txt (hhorak, 13:34:16) * it would be nice to have a tool independent "How do we build this?" description format (ncoghlan, 13:34:33) * LINK: https://github.com/jpakkane/meson/wiki/IDE-integration (ncoghlan, 13:34:41) * DevConf legacy -- something interesting from DevConf we should mention here? (hhorak, 13:40:37) * it makes things simple and more clear to have scls in current dist-git in special branches.. it will be easier to implement in rcm and pkgdb. (hhorak, 14:00:26) * First, we need to have the guidelines if this way is fine, some agreement for branches naming, etc.. (hhorak, 14:00:26) * Open Floor (hhorak, 14:04:48) Meeting ended at 14:15:08 UTC. Action Items ------------ * all to read Governance charter and if there are any issues that should be revisited, let's bring them on ML or add them to agenda for some of the next weeks Action Items, by person ----------------------- * **UNASSIGNED** * all to read Governance charter and if there are any issues that should be revisited, let's bring them on ML or add them to agenda for some of the next weeks People Present (lines said) --------------------------- * ncoghlan (53) * hhorak (37) * walters (27) * bkabrda (18) * phracek (9) * vpavlin (4) * zodbot (4) * ttomecek (2) * langdon (1) * sicampbell (0) * juhp (0) Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4 .. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot

1 0

Agenda for Env-and-Stacks WG meeting (2015-02-12)
by Honza Horak 11 Feb '15

11 Feb '15

HEADS UP -- new time and place; since we would have a collision in #fedora-meeting and it seems to be better to have meetings on the same channel every week, let's meet at #fedora-meeting-1. WG meeting will be at 13:00 UTC (08:00 EST, 14:00 Brno, 8:00 Boston, 22:00 Tokyo, 23:00 Brisbane) in #fedora-meeting-1 on Freenode. I might be online, depending on internet connection on the conference, but Vasek seemed fine with chairing the meeting. Thanks Vasek! = Topics = * Follow-ups -- what has changed since last meeting * DevConf legacy -- something interesting from DevConf? * Env&Stacks Governance Charter Review as per [1] * Open Floor [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Env_and_Stacks/Governance_Charter#Changing_T…

1 0

ACTION REQUIRED: Seeking for Env & Stacks WG meeting time + meeting this week?
by Honza Horak 05 Feb '15

05 Feb '15

Hi guys, specially new members (CC'd just in case you don't follow this ML yet), there almost were elections and there have also been some complaints about the meeting time when we meet on IRC every week, let me start picking up a new time for the meeting. Since we have quite big timezone difference even between voting members and there are other guys in the world who would like to join discussions, let's do what we used to do already in the beginning, let's pick up two times and alternate on odd/even weeks. So, voting members of Env and Stacks WG and also others who would like to attend the IRC meeting, please, fill in your availability here until 1st Feb 23:59: http://whenisgood.net/2h8sceq (voting members will be obviously preferred if no perfect time for all is found) Another thing is that I'll be not available this week for the meeting. But in case somebody volunteers to hold one, I'm sure we'll have still a lot to say about the rings and the feedback given on the devel ML. Honza

2 2

No Env-and-Stacks WG meeting (2015-02-05)
by Honza Horak 04 Feb '15

04 Feb '15

WG meeting should be newly on Thu at 13:00 UTC on odd weeks and at 18:00 UTC on even weeks (this week is even). But since nobody volunteered to hold one, let's meet the next week, Thu 13:00 UTC. Honza

1 0

Let's meet at DevConf
by Honza Horak 04 Feb '15

04 Feb '15

As we have a new time for the meeting (see mail sent few minutes before), the meeting should be on Thursday at 6pm this week (even week). Unfortunately, I'm not available at that time, so I cannot organize the meeting. But if anybody wants to hold the meeting, please do so and send the invitation. Then I'd like to remind you that there are two special events related to Env & Stacks group at DevConf [3], which takes place this weekend in Brno. First, there is a session on Sunday 12:30 - 13:10 (Discuss Environment and Stacks in Fedora). I plan to show some slides there that will probably be based on Flock session last year in Prague. I'll share some slides here on the ML later today. I would like to ask you to adjust the slides and also come to the session with me, since I wish most the time it will be discussion and ideas sharing session. Second, this was already mentioned before -- meet-up of Env&Stacks folks (members and friends) who come to Brno for DevConf this weekend. So, let's meet on Saturday, around 7pm directly at the venue, where should be some "Open Buffet @ University!" [2]. We can talk there or continue to some pub later. Looking forward to seeing you guys! Honza [1] http://developerconference2015.sched.org/event/ee6a795b2f3562b4849ff02cd21f… [2] http://developerconference2015.sched.org/event/0fbe14c5390f7d9da0c929dbfb7c… [3] http://devconf.cz/

2 2

New Python -> OS package project: pyospkg
by Nick Coghlan 04 Feb '15

04 Feb '15

Marcus Smith (one of the core pip developers and lead author of packaging.python.org) has started exploring some ideas around a possible PyPI build service. pyospkg is one of the pieces of that: http://pyospkg.readthedocs.org/en/latest/overview.html As Marcus himself says, this is vapourware at the moment, but it encapsulates a range of ideas that I think are relevant to Environments & Stacks. In particular, the notion of building for a particular virtual env may help with tooling UX ideas around building for particular SCLs. Regards, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan(a)gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia

2 2

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

env-and-stacks February 2015