Hi,
Thanks for providing the 4.10.90 and now 4.10.95 packages for F19 x86_64, the usual smooth update and all seems to be working well so far on my main box here.
I have found a couple of very minor of issues with no sound affects in Kwin and kdeadmin, kde-l10n packages are still 4.10.5
Time permitting I'll go check kde.bugs regarding the lack of system sounds in Kwin, minimise, desktop switching etc.
Thanks to all involved.
Colin
On Friday 26 Jul 2013 23:51:26 Colin J Thomson wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for providing the 4.10.90 and now 4.10.95 packages for F19 x86_64, the usual smooth update and all seems to be working well so far on my main box here.
I have found a couple of very minor of issues with no sound affects in Kwin and kdeadmin, kde-l10n packages are still 4.10.5
Time permitting I'll go check kde.bugs regarding the lack of system sounds in Kwin, minimise, desktop switching etc.
Thanks to all involved.
Colin
Hmm, when were did you get this from?? and when will it come to my local mirror?? I'm on 4.10.5
Martin
On Sat 27 July 2013 11:14:09 Martin Airs wrote:
On Friday 26 Jul 2013 23:51:26 Colin J Thomson wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for providing the 4.10.90 and now 4.10.95 packages for F19 x86_64, the usual smooth update and all seems to be working well so far on my main box here.
I have found a couple of very minor of issues with no sound affects in Kwin and kdeadmin, kde-l10n packages are still 4.10.5
Time permitting I'll go check kde.bugs regarding the lack of system sounds in Kwin, minimise, desktop switching etc.
Thanks to all involved.
Colin
Hmm, when were did you get this from??
It is available in kde-unstable.
and when will it come to my local mirror?? I'm on 4.10.5
I guess when the mirrors sync, I have:
mirrorlist=http://apt.kde-redhat.org/apt/kde-redhat/fedora/mirrors-unstable
in my kde.repo so I guess it is just a matter of time for them to sync.
Colin
On Saturday 27 Jul 2013 11:36:19 Colin J Thomson wrote:
It is available in kde-unstable.
and when will it come to my local mirror?? I'm on 4.10.5
I guess when the mirrors sync, I have:
mirrorlist=http://apt.kde-redhat.org/apt/kde-redhat/fedora/mirrors-unstable
in my kde.repo so I guess it is just a matter of time for them to sync.
Colin
Hmm ok, how bizarre dont know when i did that exactly, but I had kde-unstable disabled, and only kde and kde-testing enabled. oh well
anyway not synced yet, but thanks :)
Martin
On Saturday 27 July 2013 11:36:19 Colin J Thomson wrote:
I guess when the mirrors sync, I have:
mirrorlist=http://apt.kde-redhat.org/apt/kde-redhat/fedora/mirrors-unstable
in my kde.repo so I guess it is just a matter of time for them to sync.
Colin
There seems to be some problem in this regard because last Thursday I got one machine updated but I have not yet got that for all the others, more than 36 hours late. Usually I expect the syncing between mirrors to be more frequent.
In any case I have been busy with other issues that I have not search this longer... :-)
On Saturday 27 Jul 2013 14:34:07 José Matos wrote:
On Saturday 27 July 2013 11:36:19 Colin J Thomson wrote:
I guess when the mirrors sync, I have:
mirrorlist=http://apt.kde-redhat.org/apt/kde-redhat/fedora/mirrors-unstabl e
in my kde.repo so I guess it is just a matter of time for them to sync.
Colin
There seems to be some problem in this regard because last Thursday I got one machine updated but I have not yet got that for all the others, more than 36 hours late. Usually I expect the syncing between mirrors to be more frequent.
In any case I have been busy with other issues that I have not search this longer... :-)
hmm i agree, my mirror seems to be ftp.heanet.ie, and I still dont have the update
Martin
On Fri 26 July 2013 23:51:26 Colin J Thomson wrote:
<snip>
I have found a couple of very minor of issues with no sound affects in Kwin
For those interested I found the reason for the missing Kwin sounds, not that I miss them:
http://blog.martin-graesslin.com/blog/2013/04/good-bye-notifications/
Colin
On Friday 26 July 2013 23.51.26 Colin J Thomson wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for providing the 4.10.90 and now 4.10.95 packages for F19 x86_64, the usual smooth update and all seems to be working well so far on my main box here.
I have found a couple of very minor of issues
I've been trying it out for a few days now and one pretty irritting bug is that Amarok crashes on startup. I've been "forced" to use Banshee, but I think Amarok is nicer.
Apparently it has to do with kdelibs of the wrong version, but I fail to understand how to reinstall kdelibs properly. When I try following instructions on the net I get a lot of broken dependencies from other installed packages wanting the older version (10.5.x) of kdelibs. I am guess 10.95 really is compatible but how do I persuade the packages to accept the later kdelibs?
I am guessing the problem will resolve it self "soon" as I am seeing posts about the release of KDE 4.11 in the near future - but still. Any suggestions?
/Martin S
On Wed 31 July 2013 05:50:42 Martin Skjöldebrand wrote:
On Friday 26 July 2013 23.51.26 Colin J Thomson wrote:
Thanks for providing the 4.10.90 and now 4.10.95 packages for F19 x86_64, the usual smooth update and all seems to be working well so far on my main box here.
I have found a couple of very minor of issues
I've been trying it out for a few days now and one pretty irritting bug is that Amarok crashes on startup. I've been "forced" to use Banshee, but I think Amarok is nicer.
Sorry Martin I cannot help, I do not use Amarok or have it installed. Maybe someone else in the group can help you.
Colin
On Wednesday 31 July 2013 05:50:42 Martin Skjöldebrand wrote:
I've been trying it out for a few days now and one pretty irritting bug is that Amarok crashes on startup. I've been "forced" to use Banshee, but I think Amarok is nicer.
Apparently it has to do with kdelibs of the wrong version, but I fail to understand how to reinstall kdelibs properly. When I try following instructions on the net I get a lot of broken dependencies from other installed packages wanting the older version (10.5.x) of kdelibs. I am guess 10.95 really is compatible but how do I persuade the packages to accept the later kdelibs?
I am guessing the problem will resolve it self "soon" as I am seeing posts about the release of KDE 4.11 in the near future - but still. Any suggestions?
/Martin S
I can reproduce the problem.
Looking into my system I see that:
# yum info amarok ... Repo : installed
From repo : updates-testing
...
so I think that the easiest solution is Rex to rebuild amarok using the new libs. Or FWIW Rex's gnomes (like Santa Claus). :-D
This can be done locally but for the moment I don't have either the time to do it myself or to describe how to do it.
Sorry. :-(
Regards,
On Wednesday 31 July 2013 23.07.19 José Matos wrote:
On Wednesday 31 July 2013 05:50:42 Martin Skjöldebrand wrote:
I've been trying it out for a few days now and one pretty irritting bug is that Amarok crashes on startup. I've been "forced" to use Banshee, but I think Amarok is nicer.
Apparently it has to do with kdelibs of the wrong version, but I fail to understand how to reinstall kdelibs properly. When I try following instructions on the net I get a lot of broken dependencies from other installed packages wanting the older version (10.5.x) of kdelibs. I am guess 10.95 really is compatible but how do I persuade the packages to accept the later kdelibs?
I am guessing the problem will resolve it self "soon" as I am seeing posts about the release of KDE 4.11 in the near future - but still. Any suggestions?
/Martin S
I can reproduce the problem.
Looking into my system I see that:
# yum info amarok ... Repo : installed From repo : updates-testing ...
so I think that the easiest solution is Rex to rebuild amarok using the new libs. Or FWIW Rex's gnomes (like Santa Claus). :-D
What or who is Rex? If it's a what I can look into it =) (Otherwise it's not nearly as easy)
/Martin S
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 1:07 AM, José Matos jamatos@fc.up.pt wrote:
On Wednesday 31 July 2013 05:50:42 Martin Skjöldebrand wrote:
I've been trying it out for a few days now and one pretty irritting bug is that Amarok crashes on startup. I've been "forced" to use Banshee, but I think Amarok is nicer.
Apparently it has to do with kdelibs of the wrong version, but I fail to understand how to reinstall kdelibs properly. When I try following instructions on the net I get a lot of broken dependencies from other installed packages wanting the older version (10.5.x) of kdelibs. I am guess 10.95 really is compatible but how do I persuade the packages to accept the later kdelibs?
I am guessing the problem will resolve it self "soon" as I am seeing posts about the release of KDE 4.11 in the near future - but still. Any suggestions?
/Martin S
I can reproduce the problem.
Looking into my system I see that:
# yum info amarok ... Repo : installed From repo : updates-testing ...
so I think that the easiest solution is Rex to rebuild amarok using the new libs. Or FWIW Rex's gnomes (like Santa Claus). :-D
This can be done locally but for the moment I don't have either the time to do it myself or to describe how to do it.
I've built amarok with the work-around suggested in bug #320855 [1] and it seems to work just fine. If anyone needs the patch / updated spec file, please let me know.
- Gilboa [1] https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=320855
-
Colin J Thomson -
Gilboa Davara -
José Abílio Matos -
Kevin Kofler -
Martin Airs -
Martin S