packaging November 2015

packaging@lists.fedoraproject.org

25 participants
16 discussions

Summary/Minutes from today's FPC Meeting (2015-11-12 17:00 - 18:05 UTC)
by James Antill 12 Nov '15

12 Nov '15

====================== #fedora-meeting-1: fpc ====================== Meeting started by geppetto at 17:00:33 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2015-11-12/fpc.2015-11-12… . Meeting summary --------------- * Roll Call (geppetto, 17:00:34) * Schedule (geppetto, 17:09:14) * LINK: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/packaging/2015-November/011086.ht… (geppetto, 17:09:19) * #540 Define gcc and gcc-c++ as providing minimal C and C++ (geppetto, 17:09:38) * LINK: https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/540 (geppetto, 17:09:40) * #540 Define gcc and gcc-c++ as providing minimal C and C++ compilation environments. (geppetto, 17:09:56) * LINK: https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/540 (geppetto, 17:10:09) * ACTION: (geppetto, 17:23:46) * ACTION: Promote C and C++ page and link to it from main guidelines (+1:6, 0:0, -1:0) (geppetto, 17:24:18) * Open Floor (geppetto, 17:36:05) Meeting ended at 18:05:16 UTC. Action Items ------------ * * Promote C and C++ page and link to it from main guidelines (+1:6, 0:0, -1:0) Action Items, by person ----------------------- * **UNASSIGNED** * * Promote C and C++ page and link to it from main guidelines (+1:6, 0:0, -1:0) People Present (lines said) --------------------------- * geppetto (73) * tibbs|w (65) * nirik (13) * zodbot (11) * racor (8) * Rathann (8) * tomspur (7) * mbooth (5) * orionp (5) * gbcox (1) * tibbs (0) Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4 .. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot

1 0

Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2015-11-11 17:00 UTC)
by James Antill 11 Nov '15

11 Nov '15

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC meeting Thursday at 2015-11-11 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on irc.freenode.net. Local time information (via. rktime): 2015-11-11 09:00 Wed US/Pacific PST 2015-11-11 12:00 Wed US/Eastern EST 2015-11-11 17:00 Wed UTC <- 2015-11-11 17:00 Wed Europe/London <- 2015-11-11 18:00 Wed Europe/Paris CET 2015-11-11 18:00 Wed Europe/Berlin CET 2015-11-11 22:30 Wed Asia/Calcutta IST ------------------new day---------------------- 2015-11-12 01:00 Thu Asia/Singapore SGT 2015-11-12 01:00 Thu Asia/Hong_Kong HKT 2015-11-12 02:00 Thu Asia/Tokyo JST 2015-11-12 03:00 Thu Australia/Brisbane EST Links to all tickets below can be found at: https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/report/13 = Followups = #topic #540 Define gcc and gcc-c++ as providing minimal C and C++ compilation environments. .fpc 540 https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/540 #topic #558 Application/Library distinction and package splitting .fpc 558 https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/558 #topic #566 RPM file triggers .fpc 566 https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/566 #topic #567 Packaging Python 3 applications and modules for EPEL 7+ .fpc 567 https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/567 = Open Floor = For more complete details, please visit each individual ticket. The report of the agenda items can be found at: https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/report/13 If you would like to add something to this agenda, you can reply to this e-mail, file a new ticket at https://fedorahosted.org/fpc, e-mail me directly, or bring it up at the end of the meeting, during the open floor topic. Note that added topics may be deferred until the following meeting.

1 0

Force fedora-review to redownload repo metadata
by Julien Enselme 10 Nov '15

10 Nov '15

Hi, I am trying to do a review of a package which requires dependencies that landed in rawhide yesterday. My local fedora-review/mock doesn't know about it yet and so it fails to setup the environment: No matching package to install: 'python2-h5io' No matching package to install: 'python2-jdcal' No matching package to install: 'python3-h5io' No matching package to install: 'python3-jdcal' To get rid off the cache manually, I tried: - rm -rf /var/cache/yum/* - rm -rf /var/cache/dnf/* - dnf update --refresh - rm -rf /var/cache/mock/* - rm -rf /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64 - mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64 --init To make fedora-review to it, I tried: - fedora-review -m fedora-rawhide-x86_64 -b 1276880 --mock-options '--clean --scrub=all ' fedora-review -m fedora-rawhide-x86_64 -b 1276880 --mock-options '--scrub=all ' Is there anyway do to it? It is getting very frustrating. Regards, -- Julien Enselme aka Jujens http://www.jujens.eu/

4 6

review swap
by Antonio Trande 10 Nov '15

10 Nov '15

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Hi all, i have a couple of review requests in waiting: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215354 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1267189 I'm willing to exchange them for two other. Thanks. - -- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject 'dot' org http://fedoraos.wordpress.com/ https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter GPG Key: 0x565E653C Check on https://keys.fedoraproject.org/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWQefRAAoJEF5tK7VWXmU80kAH/AkPOhcK/NTp1D5uVaSeA1/4 tfrDAnjfBOj3YIyNyLlU1NU8PmRs48wqjdC0CBsiiyHIYyJ3rbpQS2xlgRdjAory DP5llmefFRw8VqHJo4WP9TRSH3I21NjOAfV1X5U6pvGhSiI2QSK+LazhiSZjEg92 RrdqucJAZtoDgoIZeXhGrGItlF0pTr58om7MzaSm0wMXAkqvYRxSKnKd9BgpokCW SodGWARvD5CQe3SsHA58boPCdiGadfCMBX7Js+Viti+GtxLcizt/FLMFKp5ZUPy1 VWEPIpcteJqRUUwLnjBNZC0zt8WDOynowasdEXU2efrHI0ulAH+8tQ3vLN30USA= =UT0W -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

1 0

SELinux packing page example results in fedora-review error
by myk 07 Nov '15

07 Nov '15

Hi, According to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SELinux_Policy_Modules_Packaging _Draft in the "Building the Policy Modules" section the example approach to build a SELinux policy is: %build ... cd SELinux for selinuxvariant in %{selinux_variants} do make NAME=${selinuxvariant} -f /usr/share/selinux/devel/Makefile mv mymodule.pp mymodule.pp.${selinuxvariant} make NAME=${selinuxvariant} -f /usr/share/selinux/devel/Makefile clean done So for https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1209166, in palo.spec in the %build section, I now looking to use: #Use cmake to build %cmake ../%{name}-%{version}/ make %{?_smp_mflags} cd - #Build the SELinux policy cd SELinux for selinuxvariant in %{selinux_variants} do make NAME=${selinuxvariant} -f /usr/share/selinux/devel/Makefile mv %{name}.pp %{name}.pp.${selinuxvariant} make NAME=${selinuxvariant} -f /usr/share/selinux/devel/Makefile clean done But, when running fedora-review, I get the error message: [!]: Uses parallel make %{?_smp_mflags} macro. I tried to include %{?_smp_mflags} in the SELinux's Makefile make call, but this always resulted in an error during rpmbuild. Since the %{?_smp_mflags} is useful, either 'make' needs to accept -j against the SELinux Makefile (and the SELinux Packaging page updated), or fedora-review needs to exclude SELinux Makefile lines when testing for the %{?_smp_mflags}. As I don't know what would involved in either approach, would like some guidance on whether filing a bug report against fedora-review is the most appropriate next step. Kind regards, Michael

2 1

FPC meeting for 2015-11-05 canceled
by Jason L Tibbitts III 04 Nov '15

04 Nov '15

Many folks on the committee will be unavailable tomorrow and there's only one item of business which needs consideration: https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/540 Define gcc and gcc-c++ as providing minimal C and C++ compilation environments Since our chances of reaching quorum are low, I'll go ahead and cancel the meeting. I would urge FPC folks to comment on that ticket if you have anything to add so they're not waiting too long for input. - J<

1 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

packaging November 2015