На 27.02.2014 21:31, Aleksandar Kurtakov написа:
I have similar feelings as ajax. It's not whether it's useless of treasure. If someone says "give me commit rights as I want to make tests build|fix url|fix formatting|improve BRs|etc. in package A you're maintainer" I would be more than happy to welcome him/her as co-maintainer but just showing me such things as something to be improved is not something that I would hurry to even look at as I'm aware of way more problems that affect even runtime behaviour of the package and until these more important things get fixed the rest is smth that the one identifing should come with a fix otherwise it will stay for the bright future when we have endless time and resources.
So you mean somewhere around Fedora 100 when we enter the Singularity :).
On 27.02.2014 17:24, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Thu, 2014-02-27 at 16:03 +0200, Alexander Todorov wrote:
...
Btw the URL field in the spec file should be updated to http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/lib/libpciaccess/
Oh yes, another useless rpm feature, I'll be sure to make that my top priority.
Indeed I run a small test and from 2574 RPMs on the source DVD there is around 40% of "something different than HTTP 200 OK".
The majority (30%) are responses in the 3XX range and only less than 10% are actual errors (4XX, 5XX, missing URLs or connection errors).
I'm not sure what purpose does the URL field serve nowadays but it looks like it can be removed from the spec file (and RPM for that matter)!
-- Alex
----- Original Message -----
From: "Alexander Todorov" atodorov@redhat.com To: "For testing and quality assurance of Fedora releases" test@lists.fedoraproject.org Cc: "Alexander Kurtakov" akurtakov@redhat.com, "Discussion of RPM packaging standards and practices for Fedora" packaging@lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Friday, February 28, 2014 3:56:43 PM Subject: Re: How to calculate priority for missing tests or %check
На 27.02.2014 21:31, Aleksandar Kurtakov написа:
I have similar feelings as ajax. It's not whether it's useless of treasure. If someone says "give me commit rights as I want to make tests build|fix url|fix formatting|improve BRs|etc. in package A you're maintainer" I would be more than happy to welcome him/her as co-maintainer but just showing me such things as something to be improved is not something that I would hurry to even look at as I'm aware of way more problems that affect even runtime behaviour of the package and until these more important things get fixed the rest is smth that the one identifing should come with a fix otherwise it will stay for the bright future when we have endless time and resources.
So you mean somewhere around Fedora 100 when we enter the Singularity :).
Or even 1000 :). Whenever people start fixing the problems is the right answer.
"Talk is cheap, show me the code." The time spent on these discussions could have ended in 10+ fixed packages if summed.
Alexander Kurtakov Red Hat Eclipse team
On 27.02.2014 17:24, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Thu, 2014-02-27 at 16:03 +0200, Alexander Todorov wrote:
...
> Btw the URL field in the spec file should be updated to > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/lib/libpciaccess/
Oh yes, another useless rpm feature, I'll be sure to make that my top priority.
Indeed I run a small test and from 2574 RPMs on the source DVD there is around 40% of "something different than HTTP 200 OK".
The majority (30%) are responses in the 3XX range and only less than 10% are actual errors (4XX, 5XX, missing URLs or connection errors).
I'm not sure what purpose does the URL field serve nowadays but it looks like it can be removed from the spec file (and RPM for that matter)!
-- Alex
-- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
packaging@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
Aleksandar Kurtakov -
Alexander Todorov