Hi,
after renaming a package, proper provides and obsoletes should be added to provide a clear upgrade path.
However, the debuginfo packages are autogenerated. How should one proceed there?
Related bug report: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1475537
Thanks,
"MH" == Miro Hrončok mhroncok@redhat.com writes:
MH> However, the debuginfo packages are autogenerated. How should one MH> proceed there?
Standard practice is not to worry about it. The debuginfo packages don't get updated along with the regular packages, and they carry no dependencies on them. While it's technically possible to have things added to the template that the macros spit out (which is virtually a part of your specfile even though you never see it), to my knowledge this has never been done to facilitate a package rename.
- J<
packaging@lists.fedoraproject.org