Furthermore, are there any guidelines for the creation of new groups?
Vasile Gaburici wrote:
Furthermore, are there any guidelines for the creation of new groups?
Pretty much no. We've settled on using comps for grouping of packages rather than the Group: tag. That said, it's probably best to use one of the existing groups (listed in /usr/share/doc/rpm-%{version}/GROUPS
-Toshio
Thanks for the info. I see it is possible to add a package to multiple comps.xml groups, which is more flexible that what "Group:" can express. Still, it would be nice if anaconda had a search box like PackageKit...
On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 9:34 PM, Toshio Kuratomi a.badger@gmail.com wrote:
Vasile Gaburici wrote:
Furthermore, are there any guidelines for the creation of new groups?
Pretty much no. We've settled on using comps for grouping of packages rather than the Group: tag. That said, it's probably best to use one of the existing groups (listed in /usr/share/doc/rpm-%{version}/GROUPS
-Toshio
On Fri, Aug 08, 2008 at 11:34:39AM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
Vasile Gaburici wrote:
Furthermore, are there any guidelines for the creation of new groups?
Pretty much no. We've settled on using comps for grouping of packages rather than the Group: tag. That said, it's probably best to use one of the existing groups (listed in /usr/share/doc/rpm-%{version}/GROUPS
I have added something along your words here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Packaging_Tricks#Recommend...
Please have a look to see if it is right.
-- Pat
packaging@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
Patrice Dumas -
Toshio Kuratomi -
Vasile Gaburici