I found the draft page for packaging JS libraries here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/JavaScript_libraries_packaging_guideline_draft
Even if it is not yet ratified, do I need to take them into account for a package in review that needs and/or ships a JS library?
"gc" == giallu@gmail com giallu@gmail.com writes:
gc> Even if it is not yet ratified, do I need to take them into account gc> for a package in review that needs and/or ships a JS library?
It is not ratified; it is not a guideline; it has no influence at all. We can't even say if it's a collection of best practices; what's in there might be a terrible idea.
- J<
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 8:11 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III tibbs@math.uh.edu wrote:
It is not ratified; it is not a guideline; it has no influence at all. We can't even say if it's a collection of best practices; what's in there might be a terrible idea.
Noted. Thank you
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 01:06:45PM +0100, giallu@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 8:11 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III tibbs@math.uh.edu wrote:
It is not ratified; it is not a guideline; it has no influence at all. We can't even say if it's a collection of best practices; what's in there might be a terrible idea.
Noted. Thank you
Someone wanting to work on the packaging guidelines would be highly appreciated though :-)
-Toshio
packaging@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
Gianluca Sforna -
Jason L Tibbitts III -
Toshio Kuratomi