The Fedora Packaging Committee voted to approve a revised version of the Font Naming draft that was originally proposed in our last meeting, then revised by Nicolas Mailhot based on suggestions from the FPC.
The draft is available here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_% 282009-01-13%29
It has been sent to FESCo for ratification: https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/18
Thanks,
~spot, Fedora Packaging Committee Chair
Le Mer 14 janvier 2009 16:32, Tom "spot" Callaway a écrit :
BTW for the already approved by FPC draft on splitting:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_(...)
The following exception can probably be removed, as the packagers of all the critical font packages that could exercise it (dejavu, dejavu lgc, vera, liberation) already decided independently to split like everyone else in rawhide (gnu free font could still use it, but do we want an exception for a single non-default package?)
« historic Latin fonts which share a common designer, and are intended to be used together, as evidenced by their name (for example Liberation Sans, Liberation Serif and Liberation Mono). In that case splitting them in different subpackages or not is left to the packager discretion. »
packaging@lists.fedoraproject.org