Hallo,
I have create a draft for a guildlines, which described under which condiition a so-called filsystem subpackages has to been created.
The draft you may find at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/CreatingFilesystemSubpackages
Best Regards:
Jochen Schmitt
Le dimanche 28 juin 2009 à 20:19 +0200, Jochen Schmitt a écrit :
Hallo,
I have create a draft for a guildlines, which described under which condiition a so-called filsystem subpackages has to been created.
The draft you may find at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/CreatingFilesystemSubpackages
While the overall idea is fine, I don't think anything that ships files in addition to a directory structure should be called "filesystem"
On Sun, 2009-06-28 at 20:19 +0200, Jochen Schmitt wrote:
Hallo,
I have create a draft for a guildlines, which described under which condiition a so-called filsystem subpackages has to been created.
Methinks that this breaches a bit the current standard. When many subpackages need common files, the common files are usually shipped as a -common subpackage.
There are a few -filesystem packages too, but I agree with Nicolas that they should only include the directory structure (and any essential config files).
packaging@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
Jochen Schmitt -
Nicolas Mailhot -
Susi Lehtola