Hi,
I was wondering about the use of cluttered email addresses in changelogs. The first example of the guideline at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Changelogs uses an address of the type <joe at gmail.com>.
However, right after that it is said that one of the ensuing formats must be used, and they all contain the explicit email address.
How should this guideline be interpreted?
On 08/02/2011 01:23 PM, Jussi Lehtola wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering about the use of cluttered email addresses in changelogs. The first example of the guideline at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Changelogs uses an address of the type<joe at gmail.com>.
However, right after that it is said that one of the ensuing formats must be used, and they all contain the explicit email address.
How should this guideline be interpreted?
That format is fine. If you think it needs to be explicitly stated, we can do so.
~tom
== Fedora Project
On Tue, 02 Aug 2011 14:55:57 -0400 Tom Callaway tcallawa@redhat.com wrote:
On 08/02/2011 01:23 PM, Jussi Lehtola wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering about the use of cluttered email addresses in changelogs. The first example of the guideline at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Changelogs uses an address of the type<joe at gmail.com>.
However, right after that it is said that one of the ensuing formats must be used, and they all contain the explicit email address.
How should this guideline be interpreted?
That format is fine. If you think it needs to be explicitly stated, we can do so.
Yes, I think that it should be stated explicitly in the guideline that scrambling is OK.
packaging@lists.fedoraproject.org