Does anyone else find this rpmlint warning annoying? Do we really care that much about how packagers make things line up, or whether they make things line up at all? I can see a problem with mixing tabs and spaces on a single line, but the warning triggers when it finds both three consecutive spaces and a single tab anywhere in the specfile.
- J<
On Thu, 2006-08-17 at 21:42 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
Does anyone else find this rpmlint warning annoying?
Some people sure do: http://rpmlint.zarb.org/cgi-bin/trac.cgi/ticket/19 http://rpmlint.zarb.org/cgi-bin/trac.cgi/ticket/37
Whether it gets filtered in the future or not, implementation improvements are welcome, preferably posted to the above upstream tracker.
On Friday 18 August 2006 06:25, Ville Skyttä wrote:
Whether it gets filtered in the future or not, implementation improvements are welcome, preferably posted to the above upstream tracker.
Hrm, I think I'll have to file a bug then, as the check is triggering on one of my specs and for the life of me I can't find out why. It would be supremely helpful of this warning would give you a line number where the problem is....
Hi, On 8/18/06, Jesse Keating jkeating@redhat.com wrote:
On Friday 18 August 2006 06:25, Ville Skyttä wrote:
Whether it gets filtered in the future or not, implementation improvements are welcome, preferably posted to the above upstream tracker.
Hrm, I think I'll have to file a bug then, as the check is triggering on one of my specs and for the life of me I can't find out why. It would be supremely helpful of this warning would give you a line number where the problem is....
Yeah that will be better if that warning will give you line number also. Regards, Parag.
On Fri, 2006-08-18 at 19:03 +0530, Parag N(पराग़) wrote:
Hi, On 8/18/06, Jesse Keating jkeating@redhat.com wrote:
On Friday 18 August 2006 06:25, Ville Skyttä wrote:
Whether it gets filtered in the future or not, implementation improvements are welcome, preferably posted to the above upstream tracker.
Hrm, I think I'll have to file a bug then, as the check is triggering on one of my specs and for the life of me I can't find out why. It would be supremely helpful of this warning would give you a line number where the problem is....
Yeah that will be better if that warning will give you line number also.
The next release will do that: http://rpmlint.zarb.org/cgi-bin/trac.cgi/ticket/28 http://rpmlint.zarb.org/cgi-bin/trac.cgi/changeset/1221
packaging@lists.fedoraproject.org