Re: [Fedora-packaging] [perl-Coro] Work-aroung missing libecb package on build-triggering host
On 10/22/2012 03:47 PM, Petr Pisar wrote:
commit e00f8293097f8331883f1df35f74be70fbb290b9 Author: Petr Písař ppisar@redhat.com Date: Mon Oct 22 15:46:27 2012 +0200
Work-aroung missing libecb package on build-triggering hostperl-Coro.spec | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/perl-Coro.spec b/perl-Coro.spec index 50a855d..31589a5 100644 --- a/perl-Coro.spec +++ b/perl-Coro.spec @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ Requires: perl(EV) >= 3 Requires: perl(Event) >= 1.08 Requires: perl(Guard) >= 0.5 Requires: perl(Storable) >= 2.15 -Provides: bundled(libecb) = %(rpm -q libecb --qf '%{VERSION}') +Provides: bundled(libecb)%(rpm -q libecb --qf ' = %{VERSION}' 2>/dev/null)
I could be wrong, but IIRC, calling rpm inside of rpm specs is not allowed in Fedora.
Apart of this, what you are doing is rendering your built non-deterministic - Another "strictly forbidden" item.
Ralf
On 10/22/2012 10:06 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 10/22/2012 03:47 PM, Petr Pisar wrote:
commit e00f8293097f8331883f1df35f74be70fbb290b9 Author: Petr Písař ppisar@redhat.com Date: Mon Oct 22 15:46:27 2012 +0200
Work-aroung missing libecb package on build-triggering hostperl-Coro.spec | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/perl-Coro.spec b/perl-Coro.spec index 50a855d..31589a5 100644 --- a/perl-Coro.spec +++ b/perl-Coro.spec @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ Requires: perl(EV) >= 3 Requires: perl(Event) >= 1.08 Requires: perl(Guard) >= 0.5 Requires: perl(Storable) >= 2.15 -Provides: bundled(libecb) = %(rpm -q libecb --qf '%{VERSION}') +Provides: bundled(libecb)%(rpm -q libecb --qf ' = %{VERSION}' 2>/dev/null)
I could be wrong, but IIRC, calling rpm inside of rpm specs is not allowed in Fedora.
Apart of this, what you are doing is rendering your built non-deterministic - Another "strictly forbidden" item.
Agreed. What you're trying to say essentially is that the bundled libecb version matches the system/non-bundled version, which really doesn't make any sense. I'd suggest you simply remove the versioning (or list the real bundled version some other way).
-- rex
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 10:14:25AM -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
On 10/22/2012 10:06 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 10/22/2012 03:47 PM, Petr Pisar wrote:
commit e00f8293097f8331883f1df35f74be70fbb290b9 Author: Petr Písař ppisar@redhat.com Date: Mon Oct 22 15:46:27 2012 +0200
Work-aroung missing libecb package on build-triggering hostperl-Coro.spec | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/perl-Coro.spec b/perl-Coro.spec index 50a855d..31589a5 100644 --- a/perl-Coro.spec +++ b/perl-Coro.spec @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ Requires: perl(EV) >= 3 Requires: perl(Event) >= 1.08 Requires: perl(Guard) >= 0.5 Requires: perl(Storable) >= 2.15 -Provides: bundled(libecb) = %(rpm -q libecb --qf '%{VERSION}') +Provides: bundled(libecb)%(rpm -q libecb --qf ' = %{VERSION}' 2>/dev/null)
I could be wrong, but IIRC, calling rpm inside of rpm specs is not allowed in Fedora.
Apart of this, what you are doing is rendering your built non-deterministic - Another "strictly forbidden" item.
Agreed. What you're trying to say essentially is that the bundled libecb version matches the system/non-bundled version, which really doesn't make any sense. I'd suggest you simply remove the versioning (or list the real bundled version some other way).
Also -- did you get a bundling exception for this? I don't see it listed on the No Bundled Library page:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:No_Bundled_Libraries#Packages_grant...
-Toshio
packaging@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
Ralf Corsepius -
Rex Dieter -
Toshio Kuratomi