ruby-sig August 2013

ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org

8 participants
9 discussions

BASH completion for Ruby
by Vít Ondruch 25 May '16

25 May '16

Hi guys, Anybody have any experience with some scripts for bash completion? Have you tried any? Should we integrate any? Just a quick googling gave me two results: https://github.com/mernen/completion-ruby https://github.com/pdkl95/rubygems-completion And there are probably others. I did not tried them yet. Have you? Do you have other/better tips? Thank you Vit

2 3

Bringing GitLab in Fedora
by Axilleas Pipinellis 09 Sep '13

09 Sep '13

Hello dear list! I am applying for this year's GSOC [0] and I would like to contribute by bringing GitLab [1][2] in Fedora. For those that don't already know GitLab, it is a Self hosted Git management software written on Ruby on Rails, pretty much like github's interface (you can try a demo here [3]). It is a ruby app with lots of dependencies and I think this is a great opportunity to extend the list of packaged gems supported by Fedora. Let alone the fact that with the momentum GitLab has gained (it is in the top 50 most popular open source projects on github) it would be an asset if Fedora had this packaged. Also, the core developer was more than willing to help with the process [4]. I could use any help needed on packaging. I have already exchanged a couple of mails with Vit Ondruch and he pointed me to a direction. In fact I am in the middle of reading all the related stuff from the wiki. So what are your thoughts? Any guidance, ideas or insights are very much appreciated! Regards, Axilleas PS. There is also the thought of deploying GitLab to git repositories on fedorahosted.org, but that's irrelevant to this list. [0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/GSOC_2013 [1] http://gitlab.org [2] https://github.com/gitlabhq/gitlabhq [3] http://demo.gitlabhq.com/ [4] https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!topic/gitlabhq/SQMDi-yyXmU

7 18

Proposal - location of LICENSE and README files
by Miroslav Suchý 29 Aug '13

29 Aug '13

Hi, all rubygems put their README and LICENSE files in %{gem_instdir}. This is opposed to all other packages, which put such files into %{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}. And all users and developers expect those files in this directory. Of course but ruby developers who expect them in %{gem_instdir}. Therefore I propose to put into Ruby guidelines this scriplet to unify this behavior: ``` %install mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_pkgdocdir} for docfile in README; do mv %{buildroot}%{gem_instdir}/$docfile %{buildroot}%{_pkgdocdir} ln -s %{_pkgdocdir}/$docfile %{buildroot}%{gem_instdir} done %files %doc %{gem_instdir}/README %doc %{_pkgdocdir}/README ``` and put this text into ruby guidelines: ``` All documentation files, which resides in %{gem_instdir}, should be moved to %{_pkgdocdir}. Symbolic link from %{gem_instdir}/<moved file> to %{_pkgdocdir}/<moved file> should be created. This especially apply on README and LICENSE files. ``` Obviously the choice is to have symlink from %{gem_instdir} to %{_pkgdocdir}. Or from %{_pkgdocdir} to %{gem_instdir}. I choosed the first option as those doc files are not needed for runtime and IMO should not be located in %{gem_instdir} and it should be located under /usr/share/doc as all other packages do. Opinions? -- Miroslav Suchy, RHCE, RHCDS Red Hat, Software Engineer, #brno, #devexp, #fedora-buildsys

3 2

Using Fedora Ruby
by Sayth Renshaw 27 Aug '13

27 Aug '13

I am learning Rails. Fedora has the best up to date Ruby and Rails packages. When establishing a development environment should I be using Rbenv or Rvm on Fedora of neither ? Is there any good advice you could give would you use Postgres or Maria etc. Thank You Sayth

2 1

Package reviews
by Miroslav Suchý 23 Aug '13

23 Aug '13

Hi, I have some Package Review of rubygems in queue: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996618 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=998459 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=998469 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=998915 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000334 I would be glad if somebody can do the review. Swaps are welcome as well. Thanks in advance. -- Miroslav Suchy, Red Hat, Software Engineer, #brno, #devexp, #fedora-buildsys

1 0

Rails 4 update and dependent packages (aoelus, mongoid, openshift)
by Josef Stribny 19 Aug '13

19 Aug '13

Hi all, I hope I finished listing all dependencies on Rails 4.0 in our feature page[1]. If you spot something missing, please let me know. As you can see, some updates should be trivial, but some cannot be made at the moment: * There are several packages, which depends on Ruby on Rails framework. All need to be tested an updated. These needs to be surely updated: ** rubygem-cucumber-rails (loosen the dep should be enough) ** rubygem-haml-rails to 0.4 ** rubygem-simple_form to 3.0.0rc ** rubygem-delayed_job to 3.1.4 ** rubygem-rubigen might need update (stated deps are ok though) ** rubygem-paranoia might need update (stated deps are ok though) * Following gems don't support Rails 4.0 right now and would be broken by the update: ** openshift-origin-broker and any of rubygem-openshift-origin* gems might need to be updated and tested against Rails 4.0 ** rubygem-aeolus* packages *** upstream no longer maintains the project ** rubygem-audited-activerecord ** rubygem-mongoid (mongoid 4.0 is blocked by 10gen Ruby driver) *** https://github.com/mongoid/mongoid/issues/3128 As for the Rails' dependencies, we have them all covered by now. JBuilder and sdoc are waiting to be reviewed. So to say, we would have to wait quite some time for mongoid, aeolus is not going to be updated and OpenShift is slowly starting (hopefully) to support Rails 4.0. The question is: when should we do the update? I would like to see Rails 4.0 in F20, but I am not sure if all the deps can be there at the same time. Josef [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Ruby_on_Rails_4.0

3 4

rspec 2.14.x will hit rawhide
by Mamoru TASAKA 16 Aug '13

16 Aug '13

Hello, all: I pushed rspec suite 2.14.x into rawhide tree, which should hit rawhide buildroot within a few hours. Please try using new rspec. Regards, Mamoru

2 1

Removing vendor dirs from rubygems
by Troy Dawson 13 Aug '13

13 Aug '13

Hi, What is the best way to remove the vendor directories from rubygems? Is there a macro for it? The problem I keep having is that the vendor directory is in the gem. And this is what we need to have in the %prep section ----- %prep gem unpack %{SOURCE0} %setup -q -D -T -n %{gem_name}-%{version} gem spec %{SOURCE0} -l --ruby > %{gem_name}.gemspec %patch0 -p1 ----- The problem is that the gemspec get's built with the vendor directory. So, no matter where I put the "rm -rf vendor/" I have to have either a complicated sed on the gemspec, or a major patch, that has to be updated each time I update the version of the gem. Is there an easier way? Is there a macro I am missing? Is there a non-complicated sed command that works? Troy

2 1

Package reviews for Ruby on Rails 4.0 feature
by Josef Stribny 06 Aug '13

06 Aug '13

Hi all, I need 2 RubyGem srpms to be reviewed as soon as possible: thread_safe https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=961375 sprockets-rails https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=986991 Please take them for a review so we can continue with upgrading Rails. Regards Josef

4 8

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

ruby-sig August 2013