ruby-sig January 2022

ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org

7 participants
8 discussions

Ruby 3.1 - Mass rebuild
by Vít Ondruch 07 Feb '22

07 Feb '22

Hi, It is time of the year when new version of Ruby was released upstream and we should land it in Fedora. Unfortunately, the change proposal was approved just last Thursday and on top of that, rebase of libffi broke Ruby (I am going to disable the failing test cases for the moment and hope for the best). So this brings us into situation, where won't have enough time prior Fedora Mass rebuild. I have discussed this a bit with relengs and one of the options would be to build Ruby early during the mass rebuild and fix the outfall later. I shared the proposal in the Fedora Mass rebuild ticket [2]. One downside would be that in case of problems, we could not trigger our contingency plan, which is "drop our side tag". But I hope we won't need that. Any thoughts? My fist concern is that maybe we should build more then just Ruby. rubygem-json comes to my mind and possibly rubygem-nokogiri? Vít [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2040380 [2] https://pagure.io/releng/issue/10538#comment-775197

3 40

Question about redmine
by Peter Boy 01 Feb '22

01 Feb '22

Hi, we are using redmine as our project management tool and installation and maintenance is a bit cumbersome. Having a Fedora package would make it a lot easier. Has someone already tried to create a Fedora package of Redmine? Or are there specific issues that make it difficult to create a rpm? I'm wondering that no rpm distribution includes a Redmine package. There is a third party package, but it is non-functional. Thanks Peter

4 9

rubygem(rake) runtime dependency removed from rubygem-rspec-core
by Mamoru TASAKA 01 Feb '22

01 Feb '22

Hello, ruby-sig folks: With PR: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rubygem-rspec-core/pull-request/4 I removed rubygem(rake) Requires (when using on koji buildroot) on: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rubygem-rspec-core/c/15e3de8d5ccf32c7199… Note that some of rubygems related packages becan to fail to rebuild due to this change, especially on %check stage, e.g. * rubygem-rspec-{core,expectations,mocks} * rubygem-cucumber I am going to add "BR: rubygem(rake)" for those packages when I notice such issues, but if you find it, just add "BR: rubygem(rake)" to satisfy dependency. Regards, Mamoru

2 1

orphan rubygem-ruby-ntlm
by Mamoru TASAKA 30 Jan '22

30 Jan '22

Hello, ruby-sig folks: I've orphaned rubygem-ruby-ntlm . Currently repoquery shows no package uses this package uses this packages either on BuildRequires or Requires. On rawhide, this package FTBFS because this package uses OpenSSL::Digest::MD4 and OpenSSL::Cipher::DES , which does not seem to be supported on Fedora openssl-3. Regards, Mamoru

1 0

Ruby 2.2
by Vít Ondruch 25 Jan '22

25 Jan '22

Hi everybody, Since Ruby 2.2 is going to be released during Christmas and -preview1 release is imminent (this Wednesday?), it is probably time to start looking into its packaging. So here is the updated .spec file [1] and scratch build [2], which can be finally build on all platforms. Sorry, no Copr for you, since Ruby's build fails there due to old RHEL kernel :/. What has changed from packaging point of view? Luckily, not much, but here are a few bullets which comes to my mind: * RPM 4.12 introduces new %load function, which is used to load RPM macros during RPM build. This allowed to drop my custom RPM macro [3]. On the other hand, you'll be able to build the Ruby only on F21+ (luckily, you should be able to build SRPM everywhere). * The RubyGems filesystem was not explicit enough, so there might be something accidentally packages. This is now more explicit, so we should be safer. * Ruby now ships with MiniTest and Test::Unit. The very good news is that they are installed so far as a regular gems. This means that you have to always specify them in your Gemfile, if you are using Bundler, but this is generally step in good direction. I hope that upstream will not change their mind :) Due to this change, we have new subpackages rubygem-test-unit (and rubygem-power_assert, which is now Test::Unit's dependency). No more %{_bindir}/testrb (but nobody is using it these days anyway, right? ;) * Some prevailing test failures were resolved, some others introduced, but hopefully they'll get resolved prior stable release. Generally, I'd say that not much has changed since 2.1, which is good news. Please test the packaging if you can and let me know about any issues you encountered. Also, if you have any other suggestions about Ruby packaging in general, what we could improve etc, this is probably good time to share. It seems that OpenSUSE guys are improving their packaging, so you might want to get some inspiration there [4, 5, 6] ;) Vít [1] http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/ruby.git/log/?h=private-ruby-2.2 [2] http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7578843 [3] http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/ruby.git/commit/?h=private-ruby-2.2&id=8… [4] https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/home:darix:ruby/ruby-common [5] https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/home:darix:ruby/ruby2.2 [6] https://github.com/openSUSE/gem2rpm/commits/master

4 18

Mass rebuild failure on rubygems related packages
by Mamoru TASAKA 25 Jan '22

25 Jan '22

Hello, ruby-sig folks: So looks like there is really a lot of rebuild failure on rubygems related packages - and many of them contains: Executing(%build): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.gjYYrb + umask 022 + cd /builddir/build/BUILD /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.gjYYrb: line 31: syntax error near unexpected token `;' RPM build errors: I just noticed this, I will perhaps investigate what has happened, but if someone can take a look at this beforehand, I really appreciate it. Maybe... (just a guess) this is related with https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SetBuildFlagsBuildCheck , but I may be wrong. Regards, Mamoru

2 3

Status update: updating rubygem-cucumber
by Jarek Prokop 17 Jan '22

17 Jan '22

Hi all, Pavel and I have been working bringing the new rubygem-cucumber 7.1.0 into Fedora. We have working updates available in a copr repo [0] that you can try out (as to "how", see the proposal [1]). There are some new dependencies (and renames) that need a review done in order to get the packages into Fedora: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2010235 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2010263 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2010313 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2010350 Also feel free to take a look at the PRs: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rubygem-cucumber-wire/pull-request/2 https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rubygem-cucumber/pull-request/4 https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rubygem-cucumber-core/pull-request/4 https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rubygem-childprocess/pull-request/2 https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rubygem-aruba/pull-request/2 Once we have all the required packages updated we will start rebuilding them in a side-tag. Regards, Jarek [0] https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/pvalena/rubygems/ [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/rubygem-cucumber_7.1.0#How_To_Test

4 9

Re: Ruby SIG at Fedora Council Video Meeting
by Vít Ondruch 07 Jan '22

07 Jan '22

Hi Tom, Dne 06. 01. 22 v 22:11 Tom Callaway napsal(a): > Hi! If you're getting this email, it is because you're listed as SIG > members on the Fedora Wiki. > > (In looking at the Ruby SIG page, it was not clear who might be the > right people to poke, so I sent this to you. Please forward as needed) Of course ruby-sig ML would be the right audience, therefore I am adding it on CC. > > The Fedora Council would like to invite your SIG to present at an > upcoming Fedora Council video meeting. If you're interested, what we'd > be looking for from you is: > > * Someone to present (on camera in a virtual meeting room) a 10-15 > minute presentation (with slides) on the state of your SIG (past, > present, future) along with any calls to action that you might have. > * Stick around for 15+ minutes for Q&A discussion > Yeah, I can do that unless somebody else wants to beat me. So any other volunteer? Vít > These meetings are recorded and then shared on > youtube:https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCnIfca4LPFVn8-FjpPVc1ow > > A small FAQ: > > Q. When are these meetings held? > A. The video meetings are held monthly, on a Thursday, between 1800 - > 1900 UTC. > > Q. Do we have to do this? > A. No. It is an opportunity we're making available to you, but if you > don't want to (or cannot), feel free to decline (or ignore this email). > > Q. Would the meeting be all about our SIG? > A. We also use some time to discuss council business, but you'd be the > guest(s) of honor. > > Q. Okay, we're in. How do I sign-up? > A. You reply to this email and say "Our SIG would love to do this!" > and I'll get you scheduled. > > Q. I have other questions, who can I ask? > A. You can ask me! You now have my email, or you can find me any of > the other obvious places I have presence on the internet and ask me there. > > Thanks, > Tom "spot" Callaway, on behalf of the Fedora Council

2 1

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

ruby-sig January 2022